Sen Vance had a good argument yesterday (T mentioned it also at the end of his debate). Dems present very very appealing ideas – but why didn’t you implement them in the last 3.5 years?
This is the core issue – all progressive ideas sound very appealing: why not “give” everyone $50,000 to have a house, to go to college, to have a child, to have a new kiddush cup. Not all of these ideas are bad, some are good. It sometimes takes years to see what works and what does not. The only serious counter-argument is to consider reality and experience. This election is very special – we have two candidates who were either Pres or VP. They have track record. Consider that before engaging in all your hypotheticals. This is what we are told how we verify whether someone is a true navi or sheker – make them do predictions and see if they happen. Maybe if we introduce capital punishment for politicians and economists shekarim, elections will be easier to bear.