Why not, I’ll go through them.
First and foremost, why didn’t Heidi (heidihud123) use this version on her attempt to defend herself on YouTube?
I haven’t seen her defense.
Why didn’t the couple say this story when the judge demanded an explanation as well as the reporter in the hallway, as many others do?
It didn’t seem like they were given a chance to respond, but they should have been indignant in the courtroom and in the hall.
Why would they use she is in France if they have a better defense?
Well, in france is good defense, but should have been indignant.
And to those claiming that you’re not allowed to question the judge on the program: Accusing the judge for being a liar, is permitted?
Why, when asked, didn’t Heidi say that the wig she was wearing was a replacement (as every innocent, Masiach Lefi Tumo, would say)?
Was she asked afterward if the wig she was wearing was the bought one from the receipt?
If the judge used the receipt to call the company, why and how did she call the other company? And what company has no one in the office (with a computer and data) during business hours? Forwarded to a cellphone? Stinks!
You tell me about the shaitel business. I don’t know.
If she did indeed have all information (presumably in her cellphone) why didn’t she have info on the other wig while having info on a prior purchase of $3,000 (and details such as the wig length)?
Makes you wonder.
Why did they claim that the girl only spoke Spanish (why should a cleaners be hysterical when calling a customer)?
That is not the part of the story in question. You make it sound as if the entire thing was an elaborate hoax, from the beginning. As if they were going to trap the cleaners into paying them money and therefore sent in the wig. I find that absurd.
Also, I thought her English was bad enough.
Why did their story about running down to the store contradict (and who doesn’t run down instantly when 3K is at stake)?
You only run down if you think they have it. And they thought they told them not to wash it- if they have it.
Why did Heidi try to indicate that the wig on her head (long one) is 5K while the damaged one was three?
You mean if she bought this one for 1500. Maybe that is the real value.
Why didn’t they provide a second receipt that proves a purchase of a replacement wig (because that’s what you do at a lawsuit)?
You don’t need to show the replacement. They were suing for the old one, not the new one.
Sent all her wigs to Israel, yeah right. Where’s her ‘special occasion’ wig?
Give me a break.
Last but not least, if their loss was only $1,500, why were they suing for 3K?
You are entitled to the amount the first one was worth, not the amount you replaced it for. If you break my car, and I get a new one for free, the benefit accrues to me, not to you.