He lied about many things and we can see and we will still see. In addition we are learning more things than was released earlier. WE have no way of knowing what he has done before and cannot be sure about whether or NOT he molested the child. So that is still a question up in the air that remains unanswered and we can’t assume one way or the other, it is an unanswered question because he is lying and there are things that are not being shared. Just this weekend the Daily News revealed something about the “butchering” that we did not know before. I am not going to go into that details, if you don’t know all the better for you. And I am positive that that was only part of it, as I have heard more. So there are things that will still come out about him.
The real question as to why in the world he would pick him up to begin with is still a mystery. Why would he take him to Monsey is still a mystery. At first we were told that he was left in the car and there was no sign of the boy on the wedding or surveillance video at the Hall. Now he claims that he took him in to the dinner. He claimed that he was surprised that the boy was still there waiting for him when he got home from work, but the ME said he was tied and drugged. YOU are choosing to believe the child was NOT molested or he never molested any children because HE said so, or because there was no evidence on the body? As if he couldn’t have washed the evidence off the child?