Hi Sam2.
It is nice to took a wild guess at thinking what I said is not true, especially since you have no direct or indirect evidence to support your guess. BUT, you have your right to flip a coin on what you “want” to think, and to post what you like, and that is a wonderful thing.
Please explain the circular reasoning behind my stated experience. I dont see it.
Can you break down the syllogism of what I stated to support your rebuttal as being circular reasoning? And is circular reasoning necessarily, and I am not agreeing with you on your point, but is circular reasoning enough to make ones statement fallacious?
Speaking of logic, are you introducing an assumption that I am prone to bubba meisa and lies?
I dont know Sam2. Sounds like you have an emotional investment in your rebuttal to me and not one based on fact, or my facts.
: )