Reply To: Giyoress or Not?

Mr. Doniel -“There’s a difference between a ger who states ab initio, they are converting al tenai that they’re not going to keep a particular mitzvah, and one who falls into nonobservance of mitzvot over time, according to the Achiezer I cited above.”

Falling into Nonobservance over time is Not the same thing as never planning to keep some Chiyuv like covering your hair, even if she thinks that it’s Not a Chiyuv.

“But who says kissui harosh for a woman fulfills any mitzvah? Ii think the case for non-covering has been thoroughly explained, as there are those who rightfully believe that a married woman’s uncovered hair is not erva.”

I just posted this and I’ll repeat it for you -“You’re right it’s Not a Mitzva, it’s a Chiyuv. All the Shittos (which are actually very few, nowhere near a Rov) that I heard or learned about that were saying that going without hair being covered being Ok was only as a Limud Zecus, not that they held Mutter.”