Reply To: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial?

Home Forums Controversial Topics The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? Reply To: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial?

#955609
HaKatan
Participant

Avi K:

1. Popa already answered you earlier. Again, he used the oaths as the basis for a recorded psak. And other poskim did bring them. And Zionist Rabbis still struggle (unsuccessfully) to explain them away. They are halacha, despite Zionists wishing they weren’t.

2. There only took that risk for political reasons. It was totally unnecessary, except that to Zionists any benefit to the State is more important than pikuach nefesh.

3. Health dealt with this.

4. You opt to remain ignorant, and this does not change history.

5. Rabbi Teichtal was not a Zionist. His hakdama says so. This is all nonsense.

6. Who said it is? Zionists, who have no problem with shmad of Jews, and who make nationalism a religious obligation greater than pikuach nefesh?

7. Your fantasies have been disproven, and I have tried to bring that for you.

You remain deluded by this egel. Rav Elchnon, the Brisker Rov and many others condemned nationalism and Zionism in the harshest terms. You rely on sevaras which anyways aren’t sevaras to go against them. Good luck.