sam2 wrote:
“nitpicker: I sort of hear that. But I always assume that people in the cr are looking for discussion, not P’sak. Just like you wouldn’t Pasken based on a conversation with your Chavrusa in the Beis Medrash, so too no one Paskens here, but the discussion is the same type of discussion.
“
that is plainly ridiculous and circular reasoning. with that logic, there need not be any rule like that all, for one can assume that no one would ask halacha l’maasa here or answer.
Nonsense that is exacly what is happening here all the time.
And even if OP or posters didn’t meant that, lurkers will clearly take it that way for sure.
it is also not the “same type of discussion” because
YOU ARE NOT IN THE BAIS MEDRASH TALKING WITH YOUR CHAVRUSA!
to daas yochid
I am shocked! I believe it is the other way around. Not rav Moshe was a daas yochid in this matter but rav blumenkrantz was the daas yochid in interpreting what rav moshe wrote. That is why poskim call it chillul Shabbos, not because they disagree with rav moshe.
I didn’t want to mention individuals by name but since you did, I had no choice but to follow up. another bad thing about the CR.
I know am on shaky ground here because someone may know more than is in the original tshuva, but until demonstrated otherwise this is how I think it is.
It is also strange to say that Rav Blumenkrantz did not mean for everyone,
where is the evidence of that?
and now I am done with this thread.