(just a restatement of what I said before)
daasyochid
so you maintain that other poskim agree with rav blumenkrantz that rav moshe would have permitted this makeup, but they themselves disagree with this heter of rav Moshe’s.
while I maintain that other poskim disagree with rav blumenkrantz in inferring such a heter in rav moshe’s tshuva.
perhaps I am wrong but I have seen nothing to make me change this opinion.
but wait, you also said that no makeup conforms to “rav Moshe’s heter” which would mean you yourself disagree with rav blumenkrantz! I can’t figure out what you hold at all.
and now having just restated what I said earlier (well a little more) there is not much point in my commenting further.