popa- we quite obviously disagree on many fronts. First, what do you consider “apikorsus”? Pray, tell me, what part of Torah that is obligatory, do I deny? If I disagree with any saying of a Rov ,does that make me “apikorus”?
As far as the “shulchan aruch”, for the umpteenth time, I said that what is in the shulchan aruch is obligatory,.Nothing else. And your remark about shemita is false. The “Aruch Hashulchan” has a whole chelek on “mitvos hatluyos bo-oretz”. R” Yossef Karo did not address it because it was not relevant at the time. The Rambam, by contrast, writes about every halocho (including korbonos,btw) even it is not applicable today. Please tell me what ,in the examples I gave, is obligatory?