Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Tension based on spouse's change in tznius › Reply To: Tension based on spouse's change in tznius
September 17, 2013 8:03 pm at 8:03 pm
#975477
mdd
Member
PBA, wrong — there are vetos al pi Halochah. This time you are off again, but to the left.
Unexpectedly, I and RebDoniel agree.
Truthsharer, I did not get your question.
Sam2, that’s R. Moshe’s shittah. Chacham Ovadia disagrees and holds that if he means le’shem Shamaim( for example, he became a bal teshuvah), he is allowed to compel her to keep the Halochah or else (I know, I know -it is not very American thing to do).