Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Are yissurim from negligence a kappara chet
- This topic has 42 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by newbee.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 5, 2015 8:08 pm at 8:08 pm #615796newbeeMember
For instance, if you get a bad cold for walking out without a jacket, can this be a kappara for loosing your temper the previous day or being rude to a fellow YWN poster?
June 5, 2015 8:27 pm at 8:27 pm #1090708👑RebYidd23ParticipantNo. It simply means you have entered an alternate universe where one can catch cold from walking out without a jacket.
June 5, 2015 8:47 pm at 8:47 pm #1090709WolfishMusingsParticipantA rebbe of mine way back when told a story of a person who used to bang his head against the wall constantly. When he had head pains, he would complain and say “what was my sin that I have these terrible head pains?”
The answer, of course, is that he was hitting his head against the wall. If you do silly things (including dressing inappropriately for the weather) then the punishment for that is you have to suffer the consequences for those silly things.
The Wolf
The Wolf
June 7, 2015 3:33 pm at 3:33 pm #1090710newbeeMemberIts not so pashut that suicide cant be a kappara for chet, and suicide is the ultimate intentional harm. Not to say we paskin this way.
But I am mostly questioning that what we typically call negligence might not be so. If someone got addicted to smoking from a very young age and later died of lung cancer, I would say this is a kappara- not negligence. If someone was so busy or anxious they suddenly ran out of the house without a jacket- I would say this is a kappara- not negligence since it is very possible they had no bechira to do anything differently.
Are we saying if you run out of the house without a jacket without thinking about it for an emergency and get a cold- thats kapara. But if you ran out of the house without a jacket without thinking about it for a non-emergency- thats not a kapara and just negligence? Its a fine line to draw.
June 7, 2015 5:22 pm at 5:22 pm #1090711Sam2Participantnewbee: Yes it is so Pashut. The Makor for such a Shittah was a “Sefer” written with the intention of destroying the Halachic process and has no Halachic weight whatosever.
June 7, 2015 5:47 pm at 5:47 pm #1090712👑RebYidd23ParticipantIt’s neither. Running out without a jacket causes discomfort, not sickness, except in extreme cold where it causes hypothermia and frostbite.
June 7, 2015 8:26 pm at 8:26 pm #1090713newbeeMemberSince its not so pashut that even suicide wont be a kapara for someone for a chet see (shevus yaakov 2:111) and is mutar for other fears as well (see ritva avoda zara 18a), perhaps negligence can also be a kappara. (Not that we paskin this way.)
Its a fine line saying that these yisurim come to be a kapara for someone for a chet they did, and these yisurim come to someone from negligence.
Negligence requires bechira, and very often bechira might not exists where we think it does.
June 8, 2015 1:01 am at 1:01 am #1090714☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHundreds of years ago, people tortured themselves as part of their teshuvah. Obviously, we don’t do this, and it would be counterproductive for us and an aveirah, but I don’t think it’s so pashut to dismiss the idea that yissurim can be mechaper simply because they’re self inflicted.
June 8, 2015 4:55 am at 4:55 am #1090715Sam2ParticipantDY: The Poskim came out very strongly against those who tortured themselves.
Anyone who “Mattired” suicide as a form of Teshuvah did so out of the mistaken assumption that the Rosh said it first. The Rosh never said that.
June 8, 2015 5:36 am at 5:36 am #1090716🍫Syag LchochmaParticipantWhen i leave the house ten minutes late and then go nuts because i am catching every red light, i don’t think it is correct to blame my suffering (catching every red light, coming in late to work) on Gd.
June 8, 2015 6:15 am at 6:15 am #1090717newbeeMembersyag: no can ever blame anything on the rinbono shel olam has veshalom. Gd is perfect- tzur tamim.
The question is can your suffering for being ten min late and all the frustration that goes along with it be a kpara for a sin that you did and needed to atone for. And is this different if you 1) were “lazy” and left 10 min late 2) left 10 min late beyond your control (i.e. you child needed you) 3) you were intentionally 10 min in order to afflict yourself.
I think everyone is maskim when its an ohnes as in case #2 that it counts as kapara. The question is if 1 and 3 also count. For #1, “lazy” and “negligent” are very subjective- and we can never know when one truly exercises their bechira to be lazy- perkey avos aside.
June 8, 2015 6:18 am at 6:18 am #1090718🍫Syag LchochmaParticipantit’s irrelevant whether or not you can know if one is exercising their bechira to be lazy. You can decide whether or not negligence still ‘counts’, and let Hashem decide when it applies.
June 8, 2015 1:12 pm at 1:12 pm #1090719☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSam, suicide has no place, even in theory. Sigufim do; there were very big people who did it. It’s certainly not for us.
My point is not to advocate for sigufim, but that if self inflicted suffering is mechaper, suffering through negligence might be as well.
June 8, 2015 3:15 pm at 3:15 pm #1090720Sam2ParticipantDY: newbee was.
And self-inflicted suffering isn’t Mechaper. It’s Mechayev. You don’t atone for Issurim by doing additional Issurim.
June 8, 2015 7:48 pm at 7:48 pm #1090721newbeeMemberI was what?
Whats the issur of self-inflicted suffering such as fasting?
The real question is- can we ever really know when suffering comes about through negligence vs ohnes? I would say we cant. Life is too complicated.
Please post sources for anything you say. Thanks
June 8, 2015 11:04 pm at 11:04 pm #1090722☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSource? No problem, ???? ????? ?????.
June 9, 2015 12:37 am at 12:37 am #1090723newbeeMemberDY, I was referring to sam
June 9, 2015 12:40 am at 12:40 am #1090724☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI know. 😉
June 9, 2015 4:20 am at 4:20 am #1090725Sam2Participantnewbee: My source is that there is no source. That’s kinda the whole point. We all know the source is fake.
June 9, 2015 12:20 pm at 12:20 pm #1090726☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSam, never heard of ????? ??????
June 9, 2015 12:29 pm at 12:29 pm #1090727ED IT ORParticipantthe gemorah says that HAKOL BIDEI SHOMAYIM CHUTZ MI YIRAS SHOMAYIM AND SONOS PACHUM, hence your cold could be negligent but anything else ie driving into a brick wall would be bidei shomayim..
June 9, 2015 2:40 pm at 2:40 pm #1090728newbeeMember“We all know the source is fake.”
What source do you have for this?
June 9, 2015 3:36 pm at 3:36 pm #1090729newbeeMembersam2: “And self-inflicted suffering isn’t Mechaper. It’s Mechayev. You don’t atone for Issurim by doing additional Issurim.”
And also, you never answered my question. How is self-inflicted suffering such as fasting an issur?
June 9, 2015 4:17 pm at 4:17 pm #1090730oomisParticipantPerhaps some yissurim are a kapara for that individual person. But I do not believe that every single time someone gets sick, has an accident,loses a job or all his money, or R”L dies, that it was because of davka something that specific person did. Maybe sometimes it is, but not always, as plenty of wonderful people who are YAREI ELOKIM have miserable lives. We believe that even cutting one’s finger is a siman from Shamayim. But perhaps it is because of someone ELSE’S misdeeds, that such actions bring about the presence of evil in the world, and some of us are collateral damage when onesh is being meted out.
June 9, 2015 6:33 pm at 6:33 pm #1090732Sam2Participantnewbee: By self-inflicted suffering I meant physical suffering, such as those who used to flagellate themselves. And the Gemara does call one who fasts a Chotei.
DY: What’s this Tshuvas HaMishkal?
June 9, 2015 6:38 pm at 6:38 pm #1090733☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt’s a concept found in Rishonim and even Geonim whereby one undergoes physical suffering equivalent to the hana’ah one received from a chet, in order to get a kaparah. I’m not recommending it l’maaseh; in fact, the Ramchal was against it. It is a real concept in Yiddishkeit, though.
June 10, 2015 6:09 am at 6:09 am #1090734Sam2ParticipantDY: It’s a real concept for when it happens to someone, not doing it to themselves. Sure, you might dig that up in some Rishonim. But there are tons of completely rejected Shittos in Yiddishkeit that we assume have no validity. This is one of them.
June 10, 2015 6:22 am at 6:22 am #1090735☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWrong. It is rejected l’maaseh, not conceptually. In fact, to some degree we practice it l’maaseh when we fast on a taanis, and even until recently, probably even today, there are people who fast more than just on taanis tzibur.
Something isn’t rejected from Yiddishkeit simply because you don’t practice it.
The reason we don’t practice it is because yotzo schoro b’hefseido, since it will hinder our davening, learning, and other avodah, not because we reject the idea.
June 10, 2015 11:22 am at 11:22 am #1090736newbeeMember“And the Gemara does call one who fasts a Chotei.”
This is very vague and not sourced. The gem says you can be mechaper for a fast on shabbos by fasting on a weekday, so how can you say the gem says one who fasts is a chotei?
“We all know the source is fake.”
What source do you have for this?
June 10, 2015 12:30 pm at 12:30 pm #1090737☕️coffee addictParticipantwe have a klal
hakol bidei shamayim chutz m’tzinim u’pachim (hot and cold)
something that is in your control is not bidei shamayim
June 10, 2015 11:08 pm at 11:08 pm #1090738Sam2ParticipantDY: Fasting is something separate from physically hurting oneself. We completely reject self-damaging just as we completely reject those Rishonim who were corporealists. We minimize fasting because of your Sevara. That’s not why we don’t beat ourselves.
newbee: It’s a “Tshuvah” in the Besamim Rosh. It’s a Gemara at the beginning of Nazir. It calls unnecessary fasting a Chotei. Fasting to fix a bad dream is not unnecessary. It’s the only way to fix that bad dream. And then, as a Middah K’negged Middah Kaparah, you need to fast again.
June 11, 2015 5:50 pm at 5:50 pm #1090739newbeeMember“It calls unnecessary fasting a Chotei.”
I would hardly call fasting to be mechaper not necessary. Why would anyone fast if they thought it was not helping them? It must be how you define necessary.
What daf in nazir.
June 11, 2015 9:48 pm at 9:48 pm #1090740Sam2Participantnewbee: Try 19a, I think.
Do you at least admit that the suicide thing is from a non-source?
June 11, 2015 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm #1090741KingShloimeMemberThis thread is over the top. Walking outside with no jacket causes sickness now? I personally wear a jacket to davening but not any other time, and I’m used to getting grief over that, but this is a whole new level.
June 11, 2015 11:46 pm at 11:46 pm #1090742☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSam, we reject doing it, but we don’t reject the notion that pain or suffering doesn’t have the ability to be mechaper if it’s the person’s fault or even doing. Please bear in mind the context in which I brought the idea. I’m not saying we should be rolling in the snow or allowing ourselves to be bitten by bees; I’m simply saying that there could be a kaparah from suffering due to negligence, and I’m bringing a raya from the rishonim who did believe in those things. The reason we “reject” it is not because self inflicted suffering inherently can’t be mechaper.
June 12, 2015 4:39 am at 4:39 am #1090743newbeeMembersam: ill look into 19a, thanks
Suicide from fear of torture and pain and the like certainly has sources. Regarding suicide to be mechaper, did you see see the shevus yaakov 2:111? I also recall the story of the roman who jumped into the fire and committed suicide who “earned his olam haba in one moment”.
DY- Basically, if self-inflicted suffering worked for the rishonim, kal vechomer negligent suffering can work for us- because it inherently can be mechaper. Not to say we should roll in the snow, but if we walked on the snow with shoes instead of boots, and ended up falling and rolling in the snow- that could be mechaper. Perhaps you must daven to Hashem for this- to have this count as a kapara.
June 12, 2015 4:54 am at 4:54 am #1090744🍫Syag LchochmaParticipanti wear backless shoes all year and get snow in them all winter. sometimes my socks get wet and it makes me uncomfortable. I don’t think it’s a kappara, i chalk it up to stupidity on my part.
June 12, 2015 5:17 am at 5:17 am #1090745Sam2Participantnewbee: The Rishonim talk about why those few cases in the Gemara weren’t suicide. Well, sort of. There are a few Rishonim that comment though most don’t.
I don’t have a chance to look at the Shvus Yaakov here, but if I recall correctly he’s one of the ones who quotes the Besamim Rosh, no?
July 6, 2015 7:59 pm at 7:59 pm #1090746newbeeMemberSam, as usual you post no sources.
No the shvus yaakov actually quotes those cases as his proof and not the rosh.
Im sorry you dont have the time to look at the shvus yaakov, but in the future you should probably find the time before responding that “we all know the source is fake.”
July 6, 2015 9:36 pm at 9:36 pm #1090747WolfishMusingsParticipantSuicide from fear of torture and pain and the like certainly has sources. Regarding suicide to be mechaper, did you see see the shevus yaakov 2:111? I also recall the story of the roman who jumped into the fire and committed suicide who “earned his olam haba in one moment”.
R. Ya’akov Emden was also of the opinion that suicide can atone for a sin for which one incurs the death penalty.
The Wolf
July 6, 2015 9:42 pm at 9:42 pm #1090748Sam2Participantnewbee: Interesting. I have to wonder if he’s inspired by the Besamim Rosh but he doesn’t seem to quote it. Either way, I’ll tell you Shkoiyach, you found a Da’as Yachid. Don’t pretend like it’s anything anywhere near normative to Pasken like this. Any Posek will tell you it’s suicide. If you want to pretend that extreme, Deios Yachid can be treated as Halachah, go learn with Popa’s friends at YCT.
July 7, 2015 2:11 am at 2:11 am #1090749pcozMemberThere was someone in the gemara who gave himself arba misos beis din and the tanna he had been arguing with said that he beat him to gan eden.
July 8, 2015 12:17 am at 12:17 am #1090750newbeeMembersam: “Don’t pretend like it’s anything anywhere near normative to Pasken like this.”
Ummm, I never did. In fact, when I first said it in this thread, I clearly said we dont paskin this way.
EARLIER IN THIS THREAD
newbee: “Its not so pashut that suicide cant be a kappara for chet, and suicide is the ultimate intentional harm. Not to say we paskin this way.”
“Either way, I’ll tell you Shkoiyach”
A compliment, Thanks!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.