July 16, 2013 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm #610091
DY- rashi in RH i think on yud ches amud beis towards the bottom says that because klal yisroel was noheg chanuka for a long time and everyone was noheg to treat it as a quasi-y’t therefore it is kitorah. but the end of rashi says ulichain eino nachon livatlo, which would be mashma that this concept isnt mamash mamash. im remembering, not quoting.July 16, 2013 9:06 pm at 9:06 pm #965746
I can’t look yet.
Were we discussing this?July 17, 2013 3:32 am at 3:32 am #965747
you wanted a makkor for minhag yisroel torah hu.July 17, 2013 3:35 am at 3:35 am #965748
Oh, right. Thanks!July 17, 2013 3:38 am at 3:38 am #965749Sam2Participant
Toi: Look at the Taz (quoted in the Beur Halachah) that says that Pirsumei Nisa is D’oraisa (I think it’s towards the beginning of Hilchos Channukah but I’m not positive). I think it explains the Rashi better. There’s a Rashi somewhere in Shas on the phrase Hanach Lahem… B’nei N’vi’im Heim that I think explains Minhag Yisrael Torah well (I’m either remembering a Rashi or a P’nei Moshe in Peah on the line about if you’re not positive about the Halachah then check out the Minhag).July 17, 2013 3:45 am at 3:45 am #965750yetelsMember
Mod- can u change the title to: Minhag Yisroel Torah Hu so e/one can know what the discussion is about?
Toi- please use descriptive titles for new threads in the future.July 17, 2013 4:11 am at 4:11 am #965751
no way jose.
that was funny.July 17, 2013 4:18 am at 4:18 am #965752
Yetels, please use one sn in the future so that everyone knows who’s posting.July 17, 2013 4:43 am at 4:43 am #965753sleteyMember
DaasYochid, I’d love to accommodate that request if afforded that opportunity.July 17, 2013 5:00 am at 5:00 am #965754
Stick with “Joseph”.July 17, 2013 5:17 am at 5:17 am #965755YW Moderator-73Moderator
I’ve been told you’ve already been afforded the opportunity. So no more opportunities.July 17, 2013 5:20 am at 5:20 am #965756telsyeMember
I disagree with how its been told to you. It isn’t as cut and dried. But if you could accommodate a fresh name with a fresh start that will be the only one thereafter used, I’d be happy to comply with that.July 17, 2013 5:25 am at 5:25 am #965757
DY- cmon, no props on my joke?July 17, 2013 5:35 am at 5:35 am #965758YW Moderator-73Moderator
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.