Controversial opinion (T)

Home Coffeeroom Decaffeinated Coffee Controversial Topics Controversial opinion (T)

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1615616

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    People shld b allowed to sell their babies on the open market to the highest bidder, its their property and no 1 shld interfere w/ the free market. I bet s/1 gonna say it’s unethical, but you’re wrong and just being PC, and because I predicted your opinion it is no longer valid sorry.

    #1615810

    laskern
    Participant

    The government does not consider a child a property to sell. You yourself are forbidden to commit suicide according the Torah. Slavery and human traficking is forbidden and we say on this דיני דמלכותא דיני.

    #1615819

    ndslgm
    Participant

    rebyidd,somethings is definitely wrong with you

    #1615826

    StuartW
    Participant

    Oy gevalt this is the second dangerous post i see in 3 minutes.

    Your child is not your property. Are you you out of your mind? I sincerely hope you don’t have children if this us your real belief.

    If you are joking, not funny. Don’t make jokes that could be taken as serious by impressionable people

    #1615827

    1
    Participant

    There’s no דיני דמלכותא דינה when the government abandons good values.

    #1615843

    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    I’m coming to defend rebyidd,

    If the government gives you the ability to “abandon” your child at (a fire station) a place then it has to be yours because if it wasn’t yours to sell for sure you couldn’t abandon it

    #1615847

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant
    #1616242

    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    13 Amendment to the US Constitution made sale of humans illegal. It was called slavery

    #1616406

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    Its difrent. The difrence=the difrence btween selling stolen goods and you’re own product.

    #1616749

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    parents=manufacturers

    #1616802

    Doing my best
    Participant

    Maybe you and your spouse should be able to sell children which you yourself gave birth to, but only for adoption, not slavery. and the child should not be able to get resold.

    #1616821

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    4 whatevr u wld use it 4.

    #1616922

    MRS PLONY
    Participant

    Um, what point are you trying to make?

    #1616933

    Avi K
    Participant

    1, who decides? Anyway, Rav Ovadia says that there is (Yechavei Daat 4:65 and 5:64).

    CTL,
    a. Rav Moshe says that if he was sold in order to free him there is no problem. This is his solution to adopting a non-Jewish child who might do miun when he grows up IM, YD 1:162.
    b. The 13th Amendment only says that slavery shall not exist and that Congress may enforce it by appropriate legislation. Is there a law that bars buying someone in order to free him? What if he was bought in a country that allows slavery?

    #1617415

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Now THIS is what the CR should be like!

    #1617433

    knaidlach
    Participant

    could anyone explain to me why are we even discussing this????????????

    #1617608

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    knaidlach, you pc liberals always trying to push the truth under the rug and inhibit freemarket trade but acusing otehr side of same. gues waht not e/1 consnts to be silenced

    #1617692

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    stuwart id have children if u sold me some

    #1617894

    MRS PLONY
    Participant

    Okay, this is obviously an analogy for SOMETHING, but I can’t figure out what.

    You can’t sell babies for the same reason that you can’t sell adults: They’re people. You can ‘abandon’ a baby at a safe haven, meaning that you can absolve yourself of the responsibility for the baby, not that you ‘owned’ the baby. (More like he or she owned you.)

    Maybe I’m supposed to know this already, but does the “T” in the thread title stand for ‘trigger warning’? ‘Cause this is a really triggering topic.

    (‘T’roll thread)

    #1617955

    MRS PLONY
    Participant

    Troll. Uh-huh. Who put that there, in the title? The Original Poster? Or the Moderators?

    #1617912

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    true that trigers are same 4 all people bcuz it doesn’t depend on individual ptsd case, not true that free market=trigger.

    #1617976

    MMYHS
    Participant

    did it ever cross your mind that some people post just to get a reaction?

    #1618412

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    yes. the people disagreeing with me ar trying to provocke me

    #1618476

    MRS PLONY
    Participant

    RebYidd, what’s gotten into you? You used to post in full sentences and spelled out your words. Now U R doing s/t different.

    #1618508

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    mods didn’t alow my relevant explanet tory screenshot

    #1618526

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    also mrs ploney ur argument is falashius.

    #1618549

    MRS PLONY
    Participant

    And you misspelled ‘Plony’. You ADDED a letter. I mean, abbreviating is one thing, spelling ‘fallacious’ wrong is one thing, but making a word LONGER? Are you feeling okay? I’m not being flippant; I’m honestly concerned.

    #1618565

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    (T)

    #1624761

    “Triggering” refers to a previous trauma experienced by the person. Unless
    someone has been involved in the slave trade, there shouldn’t be an issue.

    (Also, people who took RebYidd at face value – really?)

    #1625090

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    trigers and ptsd affect everyone but not for baby selling cuz there’s no/t wrong with it

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Trending