Home › Forums › Bais Medrash › Disproving the Famous Story
- This topic has 33 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 7 months ago by HaLeiVi.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 4, 2015 3:37 am at 3:37 am #615625Patur Aval AssurParticipant
So there’s this story that I once heard. If I recall correctly, it was about either the Chofetz Chaim or R’ Chaim Brisker. (My memory leans more towards the Chofetz Chaim but the content leans more towards R’ Chaim.) Anyway, our protagonist – whoever it was – once woke up late. His father rebuked him, to which he responded that it’s not his fault since the Yetzer Hara kept him asleep. The father rejected this excuse, claiming that if the Yetzer Hara was able to wake up on time (to do his job of trying to mess over our protagonist) then the young boy should be able to wake up on time as well. Our protagonist responded that that’s not a fair comparison because he has a Yetzer Hara trying to prevent him from waking up whereas the Yetzer Hara does not have a Yetzer Hara trying to prevent him from doing his job.
Many commentators (e.g. the Seforno) claim that the primordial serpent, the ??? in the Garden of Eden was none other than the Yetzer Hara.
The Midrash in Bereishis Rabba 18:6 tells us:
???? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ??
Clearly, then, the Yetzer Hara has a Yetzer Hara.
May 4, 2015 3:40 am at 3:40 am #1076190JosephParticipantIn Yeshiva we called this a kasha oif ah maaisa.
May 4, 2015 4:23 am at 4:23 am #1076191–ParticipantThe Chofetz Chaim was orphaned before his Bar Mitzvah. And before Bar Mitzvah he could have simply quoted the Alshich.
Or is that a reason to say it’s more likely to have happened before Bar Mitzvah?
May 4, 2015 10:36 am at 10:36 am #1076192☕️coffee addictParticipantMany commentators (e.g. the Seforno) claim that the primordial serpent, the ??? in the Garden of Eden was none other than the Yetzer Hara.
i thought that was going after sm (name of the malach) went into the nachash
basically before he had sm he was a normal snake with tayvas but when he let it consume him he allowed sm to enter him whereby he became part and parcel of the yetzer hara
(if something isn’t clear please ask, im on my phone)
May 4, 2015 11:47 am at 11:47 am #1076193The little I knowParticipantIt is common to replace the names in stories. This is sometimes due to inaccurate memories. It also happens sometimes when a chassidishe maaseh is being used by the yeshivishe oilem, and choose to use a character from the non-chassidishe communities. This story is told as occurring by Reb Laizer Dzikover, son of Reb Naftoli of Ropschitz. Minor details are different.
May 4, 2015 1:06 pm at 1:06 pm #1076194Patur Aval AssurParticipantcoffee addict:
Something isn’t clear.
May 4, 2015 1:35 pm at 1:35 pm #1076195akupermaParticipant“Folk stories” have a life of their own, sometimes existing over many centuries. The names get filled in as relevant to each telling. They aren’t historic documents. I suspect on further research you’ll find versions of the story going very far back.
To use an American example, the folk story of George Washington and the cherry tree is clearly impossible, yet it is a valid folk story on the importance of honesty. That it is historically impossible doesn’t detract from it.
May 4, 2015 3:02 pm at 3:02 pm #1076196☕️coffee addictParticipantpaa,
care to elaborate
May 4, 2015 3:06 pm at 3:06 pm #1076197Patur Aval AssurParticipantI thought you’re supposed to be elaborating since I’m saying that your post wasn’t clear.
May 4, 2015 3:53 pm at 3:53 pm #1076198☕️coffee addictParticipantbut what part wasn’t clear so i could know what to elaborate?
was it my WHOLE post?
May 4, 2015 4:22 pm at 4:22 pm #1076199Patur Aval AssurParticipantI guess just restate your point and specifically note how you are addressing my proof.
May 4, 2015 4:23 pm at 4:23 pm #1076200Little FroggieParticipantPAA, Am I missing something here? (oh yeah, boy am I missing..)
Where did it state that the Yetzer Hara has a Yetzer Hara PREVENTING him from doing his job???
and akuperma – that story happens to be true. I heard a recording of the conversation between him and his father (him and Shnooky too)
May 4, 2015 4:44 pm at 4:44 pm #1076201DikDukDuckParticipantMaybe it’s a matter of *Names have been changed.
And maybe the Yetzer Hara has a Yetzer Hatov preventing him from doing his job.
May 4, 2015 4:53 pm at 4:53 pm #1076202Patur Aval AssurParticipantLittle Froggie:
The protagonist in the story wasn’t saying that the Yetzer Hara has a Yetzer Hara for some things but not for others. He was saying that the Yetzer Hara can wake up on time because he has no Yetzer Hara. I am merely proving that the Yetzer Hara does have a Yetzer Hara as evidenced from the fact that he desired Chava.
May 4, 2015 5:00 pm at 5:00 pm #1076203apushatayidParticipantthe way I heard the story is that the chofetz chaim himself had a hergesh to stay in bed one day for after all, he was an old man and could use his sleep and he replied to the yetzer hara, you are way older than me and up bright and early doing your job, so is no excuse for me. either way, nice story. nice lesson. doesnt change the 1st line in shulchan aruch or how to apply it to ones every day life.
May 4, 2015 6:35 pm at 6:35 pm #1076204☕️coffee addictParticipantpaa,
you stated “Many commentators (e.g. the Seforno) claim that the primordial serpent, the ??? in the Garden of Eden was none other than the Yetzer Hara.”
that only happened after “The Midrash in Bereishis Rabba 18:6 tells us:
“???? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ??
because he let it consume him
there is a midrash that says that sm was riding on the nachash’s back
clearer now?
May 4, 2015 8:54 pm at 8:54 pm #1076205HaLeiViParticipantThe protagonist in the story wasn’t saying that the Yetzer Hara has a Yetzer Hara for some things but not for others.
That’s silly. A Yetzer Hara is what prevents one from doing his job. When he got his Taava, that was his job.
May 4, 2015 9:03 pm at 9:03 pm #1076206popa_bar_abbaParticipantNone of the famous stories are true. What do you think the popa’s of the chofetz chaim’s generation used to do for kicks?
May 4, 2015 9:07 pm at 9:07 pm #1076207☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantTroll through the mail? (Kinda difficult to post that way.)
May 5, 2015 6:48 pm at 6:48 pm #1076208Patur Aval AssurParticipantcoffee:
Still not clear. The other Midrash which you refer to is the Pirkei D’Rabbi Eliezer Perek 12, which in fact the Seforno references after saying his pshat. His pshat is clearly different from the Pirkei’s pshat.
Here is the Seforno’s pshat:
??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ? ????? ??????? ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???’ ??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?? ???? ??????
Here is the Pirkei:
???? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?? ????? ???? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ??”? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??’ ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????? ?? ????
The Seforno seems to be saying that the Torah referred to the Yetzer Hara by using the term “???” whereas the Pirkei seems to be saying that the Yetzer Hara possessed the ???.
By the way, this thread is not entirely serious, because one can simply say that the Seforno, et al weren’t working with the Midrash in Bereishis Rabba.
Haleivi:
I’m not sure how you are addressing what I said.
May 5, 2015 7:42 pm at 7:42 pm #1076209☕️coffee addictParticipantpaa,
i don’t get what the seforno is saying so much, ill have to look it up myself
where is it?
May 5, 2015 8:35 pm at 8:35 pm #1076210Patur Aval AssurParticipantDefinitely look it up; I did not quote it in its entirety. And he says several different things. It’s on Bereishis 3:1. There are three pieces on it.
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=40007&st=&pgnum=14
(bottom of left column)
May 6, 2015 12:45 am at 12:45 am #1076211☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant“I am merely proving that the Yetzer Hara does have a Yetzer Hara as evidenced from the fact that he desired Chava.”
Adam (presumably) desired Chava,
and he did not have a yetzer hara.
Animals desire other animals,
and they (I assume) don’t have a yetzer hara.
That drive is often referred to as “the yetzer,” as in the
phrase “m’gareh hayetzer,” but does that make it synonymous
with “the yetzer hara?”
(How does that Gemara about the destruction of the desire
for avoda zara go? Are there multiple “yetzer hara”s?)
May 6, 2015 1:10 am at 1:10 am #1076212☕️coffee addictParticipantcomlink-x
min b’eino mino isn’t normal therefore it has to be the yetzer hara
May 6, 2015 1:48 am at 1:48 am #1076213Patur Aval AssurParticipantThe Gemara in Yoma 69b implies that when they subdued the yetzer hara for arayos it affected the animals as well. I also recall that I had a raya from somewhere in Bava Kama that animals have a yetzer hara, though I can’t remember it off the top of my head. Hopefully I’ll check through my files and find it.
May 6, 2015 2:37 am at 2:37 am #1076214HealthParticipantPAA – the yetzer hara doesn’t have a yetzer hara! You’re mistaken.
May 6, 2015 4:41 am at 4:41 am #1076215HaLeiViParticipantThough mean the one about ??? ???? ??? ??????
By the way, Sefer Chasidim says openly that animals have a Yetzer Hara.
Comlink, before the Yetzer Hara became internalized, his desire was like that off Yakov Avinu.
May 7, 2015 10:51 pm at 10:51 pm #1076216☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhich is what?
May 8, 2015 1:00 am at 1:00 am #1076217☕️coffee addictParticipantAnimals desire other animals,
and they (I assume) don’t have a yetzer hara.
didnt chava give the fruit to the animals too?
additionally, why would the animals get destroyed during the mabul?
May 8, 2015 1:09 am at 1:09 am #1076218👑RebYidd23ParticipantBecause they were dinosaurs.
May 8, 2015 1:25 am at 1:25 am #1076219☕️coffee addictParticipantsorry rebyidd,
there were sets from each animal on the teivah, and the rest from that species died (ie 2 tigers while the rest died)
May 8, 2015 2:48 am at 2:48 am #1076220👑RebYidd23ParticipantThey were dinosaurs at heart.
May 8, 2015 4:09 am at 4:09 am #1076221HaLeiViParticipantThey were messed up through the sins of man. They have a Yetzer Hara in terms of desires but not in terms of Bechira. Their Yetzer is not checked by mind but rather through outside circumstance.
May 8, 2015 4:12 am at 4:12 am #1076222HaLeiViParticipantComlink, like Rashi describes it, in Vayetzei.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.