- This topic has 56 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 3 hours, 13 minutes ago by .
-
Posts
-
So much of this debate, both in the U.S. and EY, is framed as a binary choice where the only two options are the far-left, woke liberals who embrace every extreme toevah and the so-called “torah-true” yidden who reject any compromise on matters of hashkafah and reject the YU/REITS/MO etc. segments of the tzibur.
That is not, and never has been, the reality of Jewish observance in the current generation, going back to yiddeshkeit in the Alte Heim, or even generations earlier. There can be coexistence without compromising individual values and hashkafah.
Gadolhadorah – “So much of this debate, both in the U.S. and EY, is framed as a binary choice where the only two options are the far-left, woke liberals who embrace every extreme toevah and the so-called “torah-true” yidden who reject any compromise on matters of hashkafah and reject the YU/REITS/MO etc. segments of the tzibur.”
I don’t know if you are referring to my posts, but if you are, my point was not to judge the MO/YU etc. My point was, that sooner or later, the MO world who want to be honest with themselves and with the Ribbono Shel Olam (I believe most are, certainly within the RIETS orbit), will THEMSELVES have to make a ‘binary choice’ between a goyish velt that increasingly brooks no compromise on THEIR ‘hashkafah’, and some sort of real Torah hashkafah. Stretching that term as wide as possible still can’t accommodate LGBTQXYZ_who_knows_what_next+++, and not accommodating the flavor-of-the-month will get you ‘cancelled’ professionally and academically. They will not be able to have their ‘modern’ cake and eat it.
There can be coexistence without compromising individual values and hashkafah.
Sure there can be. IMHO, the reason there is less than there could be is simply because in big cities each individual community is big enough to do their own thing with little interaction with others. That also affords the luxury of circling the wagons and criticizing others… In out-of-town settings you do see much more cooperation.
YYA > How would one do that?
From your description, I think you are doing your part, this is great. I don’t think you should feel that existence of anti-religious extremists is a sign that you are not doing the right thing, the question is how “average” people see it. And, as Gadol mentions, it should work both ways: your depiction of “modern” institutions is also in the extreme. I am sure all problems you describe exist and people who choose jobs should look carefully what they are selecting. I, for example, deal mostly with technology and the end result of the technology aligns well with what I think Torah wants from us and 23 genders are not relevant. I also run my own business so I don’t have to depend on someone else’s value judgment (idea picked up from one of my Teachers from Baltimore who publicly said that he does not want to join his mossad with a bigger one – whose rep was sitting right nearby). But if we are talking of the essence – using chochma, I don’t think academic craziness should be of concern – as long as you know how to filter information out (or someone can do it for you). Try mussar & mikvah from Steipler’s advise. Rambam used Muslim philosophy and science – but he also ran away from Spain when crazy Muslim were in charge.
YaakovYosef: ““Yes, we believe in God Almighty the Creator who created only two genders,”
I suppose you are referring to זכר ונקבה ברא אותם. What about טומטום ואנדרוגנוס which are discussed in Shulchan Aruch?the sugya of tinok shenishba should never dull our rejection of kefira.
I personally know a number of seemingly sincere and otherwise very frum students of R”Z, from students of Kook shr”y (Merkaz Harav [sic]) to hilltop settlers. And none of their external sincerity takes away from the reality that their rebellion against Heaven is a greater danger to Yidden much muchmore than anything a decrepit rusheh like Rabin or Netanyahu shr”y could do.
Uncle Ben – אין הכי נמי, for the one-in-many-thousands of people born with PHYSICALLY ambiguous features there are Halachic guidelines what to do… That is not the same as MENTALLY disturbed people making up their gender as they go along, and imposing on the rest of the world to go along with them…
AAQ – “But if we are talking of the essence – using chochma, I don’t think academic craziness should be of concern – as long as you know how to filter information out (or someone can do it for you)”
I think we agree in practice, but we define the term ‘Modern’ somewhat differently. “Using chochma” per se does not make one ‘modern’. There are plenty of professionals etc. who fully identify as Chareidi. What makes one ‘Modern’ (at least YU style) is seeing secular knowledge as an IDEAL – לשמה. This also extends to secular knowledge which isn’t simply dry technical know-how, i.e. literature, philosophy, ‘humanities’, etc. which contain VALUES. There is a world of difference between the two approaches. Most important, those who see secular knowledge and philosophy etc. as an ideal also tend to seek approval from (and ape) the secular world that they admire… How many MO do you know study (for example) Hindu literature and try to ‘reconcile’ Torah with that? So why is Western philosophy inherently any better? At least the Hindus believe SOMETHING created the Universe…
My point was, Western philosophy and ‘hashkafah’ is deteriorating at a pace that IMHO will soon leave no room for a sincere Yid of any flavor to IDENTIFY WITH AND ADMIRE it, or even BE ACCEPTED by it in anything more than a basic business-like fashion. In other words, MO who are ehrlich בין אדם למקום will eventually find themselves sort of Chareidim by default…
YYA > to make a ‘binary choice’ between a goyish velt that increasingly brooks no compromise on THEIR ‘hashkafah’, and some sort of real Torah hashkafah. Stretching that term as wide as possible still can’t accommodate LGBTQXYZ_who_knows_what_next+++, and not accommodating the flavor-of-the-month will get you ‘cancelled’ professionally and academically.
This is again picturing the other side as the extreme, something you reasonably complained about when others look at you. Just nudge your community to accept modernity to the extent R Twersky did – and respect others that do – and let’s talk then.
There can be coexistence without compromising individual values and hashkafah.
Sure there can be. IMHO, the reason there is less than there could be is simply because in big cities each individual community is big enough to do their own thing with little interaction with others. That also affords the luxury of circling the wagons and criticizing others… In out-of-town settings you do see much more cooperation.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.