Just testing the various “allowed markup”s β˜‘οΈβŽπŸ†™

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Just testing the various “allowed markup”s β˜‘οΈβŽπŸ†™

Viewing 49 posts - 151 through 199 (of 199 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1241654

    Did @meno do anything?

    #1241661

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Is everyone else now seeing all the posts in this thread the way I am?

    How can I get it to stop? It is annoying!

    #1241684

    Meno
    Participant

    Did @meno do anything?

    It just makes a link to my profile page. There’s really no point

    #1241689

    Meno
    Participant

    Is everyone else now seeing all the posts in this thread the way I am?

    Sometimes I wonder if other people see things the same way I do.

    Then my brain starts to hurt so I stop thinking about it

    #1243628

    SayIDidItβ„’
    Participant

    This is not the first time this thread got messed up. Seems like when too much code is used, things start to get weird (hence one of the purposes of this thread.)

    SiDi™

    #1243803

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    You mean it’s weird for you too and it’s NOT just me??!! I’m so happy to hear that! After Meno’s post, I thought it was just me and that I was the weird one!

    #1244223

    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Does ending the list help?

    #1244225

    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    You mean it’s weird for you too and it’s NOT just me??!! I’m so happy to hear that! After Meno’s post, I thought it was just me and that I was the weird one!

    It’s actually your post that did it. You created a list item but didn’t end it. This system has all the posts listed and styled a certain way. Because you didn’t end your list item, and since this system doesn’t check for that, you ruined the list hierarchy that the style page depends on.

    #1244229

    YW Moderator-25
    Moderator

    HaLeivi,

    On behalf of everyone here, Thank you

    #1244234

    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    What’s the word again, when you feel so proud and glad that you’re finally noticed? Oh, I got it: I’m humbled!

    #1244362

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “It’s actually your post that did it.”

    I knew that my post did it (by accident) – I just wasn’t sure if it did it for just me or for everyone.

    I also had tried fixing it, but I guess I didn’t know how. Thank you very much for fixing it!!!

    #1267471

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant
    #1267477

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Yeah! Thanks so much, Mod 25!!! πŸ™‚

    #1268771

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant
    #1268773

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    #1268774

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant
    #1269489

    Thinking allowed
    Participant

    Testing links:
    how do you do this?

    #1269515

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I don’t remember

    #1269528

    Thinking allowed
    Participant

    Testing again, are quotes necessary inside <a href= >

    (Does color really work if done this way?)

    #1269545

    What if I put a second (blank) post instead?

    PSA: How to post links without blocking the post below yours πŸ“’

    #1269547

    Testing

    #1269554

    Does that work?

    #1269560

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Apparently not!

    #1269566

    What’s wrong?

    #1269576

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    What do you mean? You blocked two posts. Oh – was that your point? Did you mean “what if I put TWO blank posts instead?”

    I thought your second one wasn’t blank (sometimes they show up for a second, and I thought that one did, and that it wasn’t blank).

    #1269583

    I blocked one post, which only said “testing”.

    #1269587

    I think this is an eitzah, without needing to be a computer programmer.

    Put the link after whatever you want to say in the post, then send a blank (or meaningless) post to be blocked. The following post should be visible.

    I wish they would just fix this mishugas, but meanwhile, I think this works without any fancy tags.

    #1269593

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I think it’s a great idea! But I think we need two blank posts, and posters should write in the original post that the next two are blank, so the readers don’t get frustrated and think that there really are blocked posts.

    Shkoyach!

    #1269592

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    DY – I see 3 posts in a row from you. The first is the one with the link, and the second TWO are blocked by the link. You don’t see that? The linked one is listed as: 7:34, and the blocked ones are: 7:34 and 7:35.

    #1269598

    When you wrote “Apparently not”, what were you responding to?

    #1269602

    .

    #1269600
    #1269608

    Yes, when editing, it gave me the option to log the edit, and give the reason.

    I had written s instead of a.

    #1269624

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Now your blank post was moderated before the link, so it didn’t help. Also, the link covers two posts, and you only put one blank post.

    I know that because I saw your post (the first one under the link) for a milli-second since it was the last post moderated. But it really is blocked.

    The one under it (second one under the link) hasn’t been moderated yet, but it is also blocked.

    #1269623

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I mean, “not the last post”

    #1269621

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    and by the way, now it is completely blocked and I can’t even see if for a milli-second since it’s the last post.

    #1269620

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I was responding to your third post. There was a question there that I saw for a second before it got blocked.
    I think if the blocked post is the last post that was moderated, when you click on the time of the last post on the main page, you see if for a milli-second before it gets blocked.

    (afterwards when you wrote that nothing was blocked, I thought that maybe I was remembering wrong and I hadn’t seen anything. But I must have seen something, because I remember now that “apparently not” was in response to something. I think you wrote, “does that work?”. But I guess you didn’t realize it was blocked since I responded to it.).

    #1269619

    Lol. The mod(s) approved my post in the wrong order, so it didn’t work this time.

    I had written, “Yes, when editing, it gave me the option to log the edit, and give the reason.

    I had written s instead of a.”

    #1269636

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    look – can’t you see now how two posts are blocked (actually one and a half, but that’s just because mine is long)?
    And they did backwards order again, so it’s my post that is blocked even though it should have been yours πŸ™

    #1269662

    Now your blank post was moderated before the link, so it didn’t help. Also, the link covers two posts, and you only put one blank post.

    I know that because I saw your post (the first one under the link) for a milli-second since it was the last post moderated. But it really is blocked.

    The one under it (second one under the link) hasn’t been moderated yet, but it is also blocked.

    That entire post is visible to me.

    I guess it depends on the browser, so two posts it is.

    #1269954

    Meno
    Participant

    In all the time it took to figure this out, you probably could’ve become a computer programmer.

    Also, what will happen when/if they fix the issue with links blocking posts below them? We’ll be left with a whole bunch of empty posts.

    I have an idea. Maybe they should make it so when you post a link it blocks the post ABOVE yours.

    #1270110

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “entire post is visible to me.
    I guess it depends on the browser, so two posts it is.”

    That’s interesting – I didn’t realize that different people can be seeing different things. I couldn’t understand why you didn’t realize that 2 posts were blocked.

    We still are left with the problem that posts often go up in backwards order. I think this is more likely to happen when the second post is smaller and needs less moderation (which is usually the case with a blank post).

    The only way to avoid that is to keep checking to see when your post went up, and as soon as it goes up, make sure to quickly post two blank posts. But then, you still have a problem because another poster might post meanwhile, so that won’t help.

    #1270111

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “I have an idea. Maybe they should make it so when you post a link it blocks the post ABOVE yours.”
    That would solve the problem of posts going up in backwards order. But, if the posts are posted in the correct order and someone hadn’t yet read the post above yours and wants to read it, you still have a problem.

    Possible solutions:
    1. Whenever you post a link, first repost the post above yours.
    2. Post the blank post first and assume that it will go up first since it’s blank and doesn’t need too much moderation.

    I know that neither of these solutions would solve your problem Meno, but personally, I don’t think that’s such a bigger problem. The other problem is certainly bigger.

    #1271828

    Meno
    Participant

    The benefit of being able to block the post above yours is that it’s fun

    #1271882

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    only if you think it’s fun to be mean.

    I know your name is “Meno”, but I never thought of you as the mean type. : )

    In fact I only just realized that your name is a homonym for meano.

    #1273136

    πŸ‘‘RebYidd23
    Participant

    #1303962

    ubiquitin
    Participant
    #1303971

    Yes, I like it.

    #1470505

    (Test post)

Viewing 49 posts - 151 through 199 (of 199 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Trending