- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 17 hours, 3 minutes ago by .
-
Posts
-
As wrong as it may seem, purely from a emotion, political free perspective, did Mamdani have a point in his PC speech about the islamist terror attack outside his own place?
Meaning, yes one may argue that anti islamist takeover is very far from “abhorrent” as he stated, it IS a REAL issue (unlike he thinks maybe because he’s one himself), it is a very big problem.
However, he made a point of free speech, and to be fair, he has a point, and, there are pluses and minuses to that.
The pluses are well, as you can see, some people were able to hold their anti islamist takeover protest, and the minuses are that people like Mamdani are allowed to as well. No…?
To say some of the stuff he has said in the past may not fall under that category, being that incitement cannot be included in free speech, however, as ludicrous as it may be for him to say so, all he said was he abhorred it, but upheld its rights, as it is free speech…
What do you guys think?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.