Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha
- This topic has 56 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 6 hours, 8 minutes ago by Yaakov Yosef A.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 9, 2026 10:24 am at 10:24 am #2496932RightJewParticipant
This is not about “Zionism”, no one can hide behind fake “anti-Zionism” to oppose halachically mandated Jewish self-defense.
The halacha requires military self-defense, even on Shabbat, regardless if certain Satmar/Neturei Karta decide to Reform the Torah.
Hareidim, even if they are truly learning Torah all day, should be required to undergo a short basic training period so they can defend their own communities if necessary.
Post-Oct. 7 Security Strategy Advances as Arad Rifles Reach Local Defense Teams
“עכו”ם שצרו על עיירות ישראל אם באו על עסק ממון אין מחללין עליהם את השבת באו על עסק נפשות ואפי’ סתם יוצאים עליהם בכלי זיין ומחללים עליהם את השבת ובעיר הסמוכה לספר אפילו לא באו אלא על עסקי תבן וקש מחללין עליהם את השבת: הגה ואפילו לא באו עדיין אלא רוצים לבא [א”ז]:
”
(Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 329:6)January 11, 2026 4:27 pm at 4:27 pm #2496950akupermaParticipantNot if you are the aggressor which is the position of the non-Zionist Hareidim. The Palestinians had no issues with Jews have a self-governing autonomous community, but did object when the Zionists demanded that they have political control and that the Palestinians would be ruled by Jews. Note that when Palestinians discuss the status quo ante they want restored, it is to 1914 not 1947. Note the discussion of the “three oaths” by the original Satmar Rebbe. The solution that might work would to allow the anti-zionist Hareidim the same status under Israeli law as Palestinians (limited civil rights in return from an exemption from military service), Also consider that persecution of Jews who have a halachic objection to the establishment of a secular medinah and who are refusing to fight for it, are “conscientious objectors” under international law and that persecuting them would be a public relations disaster for the zionists since what little support the medinah has among the goyim is largely religious in nature and will not look favorably on persecuting Jews for being too religious.
January 11, 2026 4:27 pm at 4:27 pm #2496951somejewiknowParticipantWhile you are correct that the halacha would indeed mandate that Jews rise up and violently fight the Zionists (like any other masis umadiach, kofer, michalel shabos, etc), we have unfortunately lost the masora of how to be “moredim”, as our Gedolim have taught us that we must wait for Moshiach to fight these wars against Hashem when the zionists and their supporters will be destroyed.
The only remaining Jewish “self defense” is to continue being mocheh these zionist rashoyim and strengthen the religious Jewish community to uproot all of their propaganda and heresy from our midst.
January 11, 2026 4:28 pm at 4:28 pm #2496975israeli docParticipantYou are living in a dream if you think those folks will be swayed by halachah. “The Gedolim Say” is all they have to respond. “Das Torah” trumps halachah when it comes to preserving the chareidi lifestyle and power structure. Any halachic authority (regardless of his gadlus in Torah) who paskens otherwise is not a “gadol”, because his hashkafa is “wrong”, his mesora is “wrong”, and in their eyes is likely an apikorus or oved avoda zara. Although HKBH lives within the dalet amos of halacha, the chareidi world lives within the dalet amos of hashkafah.
January 11, 2026 4:28 pm at 4:28 pm #2497164HaKatanParticipant@RightJew (WrongZionist?):
It is the Zionists that discarded the Torah.The gedolim surely know that halacha in Shulchan Aruch at least as well as you do, and that has nothing to do with either group you mentioned (which you mentioned just because you presumably wanted to wrongly trash them anyways).
If you have ideas about the S”A or whatever else, you could start by consulting your LOR.
January 11, 2026 4:28 pm at 4:28 pm #2496977yuda the maccabiParticipantgood point, you should ask your ques. to Gedolei Yisroel who paskened not to enlist, I’m sure they have good answers. Meanwhile presenting questions as if Gedolei Yisroel never learned Gmarra or Hilchos shabbos is kind of foolish
January 11, 2026 4:28 pm at 4:28 pm #2497173SQUARE_ROOTParticipantQUESTION:
“Why are the 20% of the population who are Arabs NOT being drafted?”
===========================
MY RESPONSE:Thank you for your comment. Please allow me to explain:
In Israel, Arabs are NOT DRAFTED INTO THE ARMY,
because the Arabs are THE ENEMY that
the Israel Army is working to defend against.In Israel, Arabs are NOT DRAFTED INTO THE ARMY,
because the Arabs CANNOT BE TRUSTED
with guns or with anything.Have a nice day!
January 11, 2026 4:28 pm at 4:28 pm #2497174SQUARE_ROOTParticipantRabbi Yisroel Meir Lau (Chief Ashkenazic Rabbi
of Israel from 1993 CE to 2003 CE) said this:“Over the years I have had the very special opportunity
to pray near some of the greatest rabbis
on the holiest night of the year, Yom Kippur.
I have prayed near Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and Rabbi Leizer Shach.
I saw and heard them cry, shedding copious tears
as they recited the Ashamnu and Al Cheit prayers.And I saw them cry when they heard that our soldiers had been killed.”
SOURCE: At the Maggid’s Seder (commentary on
“this is the bread of affliction”, page 92) by Rabbi Paysach J. Krohn,
year 2020 CE, ArtScroll Mesorah Publications,
ISBN-10: 1422625753 ISBN-13: 978-1422625750
_________________________________________________
PERSONAL COMMENT 1:Most of those soldiers who died were NEVER religious and NEVER Shomer Shabbat.
Yet Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and Rabbi Leizer Shach
CRIED when they heard that “OUR soldiers” had been killed.Notice that Rabbi Paysach J. Krohn refers to them as
“OUR soldiers”, even though
they were never religious, and even though
they were never Shomer Shabbat, and even though
they took orders from Secular commanders of a Secular Jewish State.Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and Rabbi Leizer Shach
CRIED when they heard that “OUR soldiers” had been killed.Why do the Chareidi anti-Zionists not cry when
they hear that “OUR soldiers” have been killed?
_________________________________________________
PERSONAL COMMENT 2:FACT: If Israel were not a Jewish state, then NOBODY
would care at all about the so-called “Palestinians” (phoney-stinians).The proof is that NOBODY protests when Muslims kill Muslims.
The proof is that NOBODY complains when Arabs murder Arabs.January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497175SQUARE_ROOTParticipantJanuary 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497176SQUARE_ROOTParticipantIf you truly believe that the merit of Torah Study [Limmud HaTorah]
is the ONLY thing that we Jews need to protect us
from genocidal Muslim terrorists, then you should PROVE IT
by establishing a yeshivah in Lebanon and another yeshivah in Damascus [Syria].Both Lebanon and Damascus are Halachically part of Eretz Yisrael.
You will NEVER do this, because you know that
without the protection of THE ISRAELI ARMY,
both yeshivahs would soon be: killed, murdered, massacred, destroyed,
annihilated and exterminated, and not even one Jew would remain alive.Pesachim 64B clearly teaches that “it is forbidden to rely on miracles”:
תלמוד בבלי מסכת פסחים דף סד/ב
תנן: ולא סמכינן אניסאIf a yeshivah were established in Lebanon or Damascus, where
The Israeli Army cannot protect them, then those yeshivahs
would violate the prohibition against relying on miracles.In year 1929 of Common Era, 67 righteous students of
the Chevron Yeshivah (HYD ZTL ZYA) were brutally murdered
by wicked bloodthirsty Muslims. Those righteous students
(HYD ZTL ZYA) had the merit of Torah Study, but without
the Israeli Army to protect them, they were all brutally murdered.May G*D avenge every one of them at least 50,000 times.
January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497177SQUARE_ROOTParticipantHousing Minister and UTJ chairman Yitzchak Goldknopf said:
“We owe hakaras hatov to IDF soldiers,
who put their lives on the line to protect
Klal Yisrael and Eretz Yisrael.”SOURCE: article titled: “Goldknopf Condemns Chareidim
Cursing At Soldiers In Bnei Brak” 2025 April 1 CE,
Yeshiva World News, www (dot) TheYeshivaWorld (dot) com__________________________________________
“Yitzchak Goldknopf, born in Jerusalem to a well-connected
Gur Hasidic family, is a prominent figure in the Israeli ultra-Orthodox
(Haredi) community and the United Torah Judaism (UTJ) party leader.”SOURCE: www (dot) JewishVirtualLibrary (dot) org
January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497191guteyidParticipantIf you are trying to insinuate that theres an obligation to join the Israeli army based on this, sorry, its a nice try but not gonna work.
Set up a independent self-defense course and you’ll have many (C)hareidim join.
January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497211anIsraeliYidParticipant@RightJew – good luck with that approach. Those who refuse to help in the defense of Jewish lives will darshen away about how that doesn’t apply to these specific circumstances for one reason or another – ignoring the plain language of the Shulchan Aruch. They’ll also call you an Apikores for not blindly trusting the “Gedolei haDor” who say that this does not apply without even the fig leaf of explaining WHY it does not apply.
an Israeli Yid
January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497259DrYiddParticipantnot just self-defense but protection from an enemy attack.
January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497284XPRESSParticipantJoining a mixed gender, left wing liberal, anti Torah army is not a mitzvah, it is an aveira.
January 11, 2026 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #2497374Just VisitingParticipantAccording to that logic, everyone would be obligated to become a doctor in order to save lives. Rav Moshe Feinstein zt”l famously rules that no such obligation exists. The chiyuv to save a life applies only if one already possesses the necessary knowledge; there is no obligation to learn how to do it in the first place. (Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah II:151)
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497673☕️coffee addictParticipant“Hareidim, even if they are truly learning Torah all day, should be required to undergo a short basic training period so they can defend their own communities if necessary.”
100% and they don’t have to go to the army app they need is a firearm course
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497680Just VisitingParticipantDear editor, I don’t know how you allowed israeli doc’s comment to be published! His comment is total slander against chareidim and total ignorance! If you indeed ask a Rav about what should and should not be published on your site, I ask you please inquire about this comment immediately!
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497726Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantguteyid> Set up a independent self-defense course and you’ll have many (C)hareidim join.
a gut point! Not sure why you expect someone else to set it up – the charedi community should do it on their own. Can start by policing people who attack buses and army events. Then, extend to protecting their communities.
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497727Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantJust> Everyone would be obligated to become a doctor in order to save lives. Rav Moshe Feinstein zt”l famously rules that no such obligation exists.
Self-protection from attackers is different from being a doctor, and obligation would be different. And even when one is not obligated, we have a lot of people who are trying to be super-frum in mitzvos. Maseches Taanis describes a doctor who was visited by yeshiva shel maaleh more often than Abaye and Rava (despite his bloodletting methods were not the most effective ones – surely a fact known b’shmayim!). I would presume many would like to follow in his steps.
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497732RightJewParticipant@akuperma – “when Palestinians discuss the status quo ante they want restored, it is to 1914 not 1947”
There was never in history a so-called “Palestinian” state, the notion of “Palestine” was a fake invention by Roman Jew hating colonialists.
Prior to 1917, the Ottoman Empire controlled the Land of Israel, not the Arabs and not any Fakestine state.
The British General Allenby conquered the Land of Israel in 1917, and the British were given a Mandate to create a “national home for the Jewish people”. The US Congress endorsed the Mandate.
In the Jewish Torah, in the first Rashi, Hashem gave the Land of Israel to the Jews, not to the Ishmaelim.
If the Jewish Torah disturbs you and your sympathies lie with the “rights” of Ishmaelim to Eretz Yisrael, then perhaps you should find a friendly mosque and submit to “allah” and his (false) prophet Mohamed Y”S.
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497755ZSKParticipant“While you are correct that the halacha would indeed mandate that Jews rise up and violently fight the Zionists (like any other masis umadiach, kofer, michalel shabos, etc), we have unfortunately lost the masora of how to be “moredim”, as our Gedolim have taught us that we must wait for Moshiach to fight these wars against Hashem when the zionists and their supporters will be destroyed.
1) I thought it was “maysis imaydiach”?
2) Violently fight would only apply to an Ir Ha-Nidachas. The three you listed would be executed, assuming the criteria were fulfilled. Learn Halacha.
3) Zionism – yeah, we know, you wish we would all die CV”H, because you’re a Sonei Yisrael par excellence.Most importantly:
4) You’re waiting for Moshaich to fight against Hashem, after the Zionists are destroyed? That is very interesting.January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497812akupermaParticipantSQUARE_ROOT: Without the Zionists to start the war with the Muslims, there would have been no pogrom in 1929. While the status of a “dhimmi” under the pre-1914 “Millet” system was very similar to the status of American Blacks under Jim Crow, it did not include a fear of pogroms. And, it can also be argued that the British, who wanted a Jewish-Arab conflict under their “divide and conquer” strategy, and the Zionists who wanted to purge the strongest anti-zionist faction, were quite happy with the massacre of hareidim and made a point of not interfering even though there is strong evidence that both had prior knowledge.
January 12, 2026 10:54 am at 10:54 am #2497821akupermaParticipantRe: “In Israel, Arabs are NOT DRAFTED INTO THE ARMY, because the Arabs CANNOT BE TRUSTED with guns or with anything.”
Actually many Arabs serve in the IDF, including some as senior officers (ranks that would be translated as “generals”). Those who do not serve in the IDF have reduced civil rights, but still more rights than Arab Muslims have in most Arab countries (which is why apparently half of Palestinians hold Israeli citizenship vote for Zionist parties).
An argument can be made that a Melekh Yisrael (which by definition is a usurper, since he isn’t from Beis David) who goes against Torah, can and should be overthrown. By drafting, and arming, Hareidim who see the zionist state as lacking legitimacy, you are giving weapons to those who will turn on the medinah. Do you really what Peleg to have automatic weapons??????
January 12, 2026 5:49 pm at 5:49 pm #2498281Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantakuperma> An argument can be made that a Melekh Yisrael (which by definition is a usurper, since he isn’t from Beis David) who goes against Torah, can and should be overthrown
Not so fast. See discussion between Herod and Bava Ben Zuta in the beginning of Bava Basra – rabonim were very reluctant to talk against the government even when it was extremely bad.
January 12, 2026 5:49 pm at 5:49 pm #2498286Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantakuperma> By drafting, and arming, Hareidim who see the zionist state as lacking legitimacy, you are giving weapons to those who will turn on the medinah.
Do peleg really represent ajority of charedi public? Probably, a majority of them will quickly learn how to live with the Army without comproming their principles – as long as the leadership let them do it.
January 13, 2026 10:30 am at 10:30 am #2498311akupermaParticipantAlways_Ask_Questions: There appears to be significant minority of hareidim who regard the zionists as being enemies of Torah. There is certainly reason to see the destruction of Torah education and vilification of a Mitsvos-oriented lifestyle as matters of life and death (and if you compare the percentage of Jews who were Shomer Shabbos and Shomer Kasrus before Zionism, it certainly doesn’t make the Zionists look “frum”). So perhaps there is reason they see the zionists as being similar to Kapos, many of whom were executed by Jews when the opportunity arose. So perhaps one should note that the revolt against the Romans (with the Herodian family being Kapos-in Chief) was also against a lawfully constituted government, that many rabbanim worked with, and was supported by many Jews – and in Eretz Yisrael the Jews who killed the anti-Torah but established government are hailed as heroes. Also remember that any Hareidi who insists on doing mitsvos in a manner objected to by the secular leadership of the army may not be anti-zionist when he goes, but will be anti-zionist when he goes out. And I’m not even discussing the “Three Oaths” or whether it is allowed to kill unarmed enemy civilians without approval from a Sanhedrin, a Navi and/or a Kohen Gadol who checks the Urim v’Tumim, or during a war of conquest that lacks proper Torah authorization if it is permitted to kill enemy soldiers when you have the opportunity to safely stand down.
And think giving guns to the anti-zionist hareidim is a clever idea? “Clever by half” as the goyim say. Smarter to exempt any Hareidi as a conscientious objector, and give them the same rights and benefits as are given the Palestinians holding Israeli passports who choose not to serve in the IDF- and rely on incentives to encourage Hareidim (and others – actually many non-Hareidim also refuse to serve in the IDF).
January 13, 2026 10:30 am at 10:30 am #2498312yankel berelParticipantJanuary 13, 2026 12:03 pm at 12:03 pm #2498595israeli docParticipantAAK – ” as long as the leadership let them do it” strikes the nail on the head. It will never happen b/c the idea of a chareidi following orders / instruction from anyone other than a Torah authority is an anathema. It destroys the power dynamic inherent in chareidi hashkafah.
January 13, 2026 12:03 pm at 12:03 pm #2498594israeli docParticipantAAK – ” as long as the leadership let them do it” strikes the nail on the head. It will never happen b/c the idea of a chareidi following orders / instruction from anyone other than a Torah authority is an anathema. It destroys the power dynamic inherent in chareidi hashkafah.
January 13, 2026 8:19 pm at 8:19 pm #2498730Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantisraelidoc> It will never happen b/c the idea of a chareidi following orders / instruction from anyone other than a Torah authority is an anathema.
yes and no. There is a video on front page with R Landau saying that bochurim should not be at the demonstration and that situation is not simple and leadership is “doing the best they can”. So, who are all these people demonstrating while ignoring/or being ignorant of the instructions?
My theory is that this is a history-driven sociological trap: leadership established separate communities (Rambam’s deserts in the words of Chazon Ish), had to use separatist ideology to protect them (and this worked well both in Israel and US), and now these ideologies took over the crowds beyond the temporary measures they were, and leadership is unable to change them, in part because the protection is based on “we are right, and they are always evil”, but also because they can’t go against the load crowds. Emes is the biggest loss of this complex process.
January 16, 2026 9:45 am at 9:45 am #2499638RightJewParticipant“עוֹבְדֵי כּוֹכָבִים וּמַזָּלוֹת שֶׁצָּרוּ עַל עֲיָרוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אִם בָּאוּ עַל עִסְקֵי מָמוֹן אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת וְאֵין עוֹשִׂין עִמָּהֶן מִלְחָמָה. וּבְעִיר הַסְּמוּכָה לַסְּפָר אֲפִלּוּ לֹא בָּאוּ אֶלָּא עַל עִסְקֵי תֶּבֶן וְקַשׁ יוֹצְאִין עֲלֵיהֶן בִּכְלֵי זַיִן וּמְחַלְּלִין עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. וּבְכָל מָקוֹם אִם בָּאוּ עַל עִסְקֵי נְפָשׁוֹת אוֹ שֶׁעָרְכוּ מִלְחָמָה אוֹ שֶׁצָּרוּ סְתָם יוֹצְאִין עֲלֵיהֶן בִּכְלֵי זַיִן וּמְחַלְּלִין עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. וּמִצְוָה עַל כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁיְּכוֹלִין לָבוֹא וְלָצֵאת וְלַעֲזֹר לְאַחֵיהֶם שֶׁבַּמָּצוֹר וּלְהַצִּילָם מִיַּד הָעוֹבְדֵי כּוֹכָבִים וּמַזָּלוֹת בְּשַׁבָּת. וְאָסוּר לָהֶן לְהִתְמַהֲמֵהַּ לְמוֹצָאֵי שַׁבָּת. וּכְשֶׁיַּצִּילוּ אֶת אֲחֵיהֶן מֻתָּר לָהֶן לַחֲזֹר בִּכְלֵי זַיִן שֶׁלָּהֶן לִמְקוֹמָם בְּשַׁבָּת כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא לְהַכְשִׁילָן לֶעָתִיד לָבוֹא:
‘
(Rambam, Hilchot Shabbat 2:23)
@HaKatan – “The gedolim surely know that halacha in Shulchan Aruch at least as well as you do”
I don’t know which fantasy “gedolim” you follow, but I could not find any commentaries in Shulchan Aruch that opposed that halacha which originates in the Talmud Eruvin 45.Neither the Rambam nor the other great poskim believed in fantasy halacha that relies on miracles.
The Rambam I cited above amplifies the halacha of self-defense by adding: “It is a mitzvah for every member of the Jewish people who can come [to their assistance] to go out and aid their brethren who are under siege and save them from the gentiles [although it is the] Sabbath.”
Nowhere does the Rambam state that Jews who learn Torah all day are exempted from the military defense of the Land of Israel when it is under attack by enemies.
As I have tried to explain, this issue is not about Zionism or anti-Zionism (despite the constant attempts to use “anti-Zionism” as a facade and diversion from real Torah and halacha).
Those who attempt to nullify this very important halacha, derived from the Talmud, are serving notice that they are Karaites and Tzaddukim who reject the Talmud.
January 16, 2026 9:45 am at 9:45 am #2499819RightJewParticipant@somejewiknow – “violently fight the Zionists”
@akuperma – “Not if you are the aggressor”There seems to be a problem here in your reading comprehension.
The halacha I quoted stated:
“עכו”ם שצרו על עיירות ישראל ”
“If non-Jews besiege a Jewish city…”The halacha cited above clearly refers to non-Jews who besiege a Jewish city, in which case halacha requires military self-defense against those non-Jews, even on Shabbat.
This halacha has zero to do with your anti-Zionist fantasies which form the basis of the fake anti-Torah religion you have invented.
January 16, 2026 2:58 pm at 2:58 pm #2499953HaKatanParticipantWrong Zionist:
It is you who seem to be using Zionism as a facade and diversion, as implied by your nasty comment against Satmar (and NK).
Nobody in Satmar or NK (those are very different), to anyone’s public knowledge, has forbidden following that halacha. For you to (falsely, in general) condemn them for doing so implies that you are doing exactly that: “using Zionism as a facade and diversion”.As posted, if you really feel that Chareidim need some sort of defense training and that doing so would be a fulfillment of that halacha then you could speak to an LOR to ask why the gedolim haven’t done so. As posted, they are obviously well aware of that halacha.
Your needless and false bashing of Satmar (and NK) is wrong, and makes it seem that Zionism is indeed the reason for your post.
January 18, 2026 3:33 pm at 3:33 pm #2500303Yaakov Yosef AParticipantAAQ said – Maseches Taanis describes a doctor who was visited by yeshiva shel maaleh more often than Abaye and Rava (despite his bloodletting methods were not the most effective ones – surely a fact known b’shmayim!). I would presume many would like to follow in his steps.
Nice. The Gemara there (24b) asks what was so special about Abba Umna, and one of the things listed is him going to great lengths to avoid any unnecessary exposure of female patients. So to your mind “following in his steps” would mean joining the IDF, because there they are very careful about tzniyus… Or becoming a modern doctor, most of whom are very machmir in tzniyus… He wasn’t a Tzaddik BECAUSE he was a doctor. DESPITE being a doctor, which exposes one to certain additional nisyonos, he STILL managed to be a Tzaddik. Like they say here יחי ההבדל הקטן…
January 18, 2026 3:33 pm at 3:33 pm #2500307Yaakov Yosef AParticipantBrilliant RightJew. Big chiddush.
News flash. Gedolei Yisroel also know how to read Shulchan Aruch. They also know some more things about the Torah and, lehavdil, about what goes on in the IDF.
The NYPD and US Army also protect many Jews. It seems your interest in the IDF is not purely from a practical standpoint.
January 19, 2026 10:48 am at 10:48 am #2500445Yaakov Yosef AParticipantRightJew said – The halacha cited above clearly refers to non-Jews who besiege a Jewish city, in which case halacha requires military self-defense against those non-Jews, even on Shabbat.
The Halacha in question is in Hilchos Shabbos. It PERMITS defensive combat on Shabbos on an ad-hoc basis under certain conditions. It says NOTHING about the necessity or even permissibility of establishing an organized army בזמן הזה. This is more relevant to Shomrim than to the IDF.
January 19, 2026 10:48 am at 10:48 am #2500446Yaakov Yosef AParticipantAAQ said – My theory is that this is a history-driven sociological trap: leadership established separate communities (Rambam’s deserts in the words of Chazon Ish), had to use separatist ideology to protect them (and this worked well both in Israel and US), and now these ideologies took over the crowds beyond the temporary measures they were, and leadership is unable to change them, in part because the protection is based on “we are right, and they are always evil”, but also because they can’t go against the load crowds. Emes is the biggest loss of this complex process.
עד כאן דבריו.You are rambling off too much nonsense to break down one by one. Let’s focus on the core issue. Secular Zionism was a highly organized and targeted campaign to destroy Judaism and replace it with a secular national identity. Period. Everything else, including the IDF, was a היכא תמצא to accomplish that. In other words, the State in general, and the IDF in particular, are one big social engineering project to create a new Jewish identity. This was never a secret. Not participating in that project is not some special “separatist ideology” or social phenomenon, it’s basic Judaism 101. That was even before ‘gender integration’ became ubiquitous in all parts of the IDF. Why in the world do you think the Rabbonim should “go against the crowds” and send the boys to Kefirah and Gilui Arayos galore in the name of – “Emes”?! (Did you mean to say ’emesis’?) What will be with the IDF and who will fight the Arabs is a red herring. The Chilonim don’t have a long term solution to Israel’s problems any more than the Chareidim do. Our job is to keep the Torah and Mitzvos. Sorry to disappoint you, but that does not include having an army during Galus. If truly Torah observant Jews end up becoming a majority in Israel, there will be many issues to deal with. When we get there, Gedolei Yisroel will deal with it. They aren’t afraid of “the crowds”. They are afraid of איסורי כרת וסקילה and more, which will have to be cleaned out of the IDF altogether. For now, it’s just regular Galus survival as usual under Jewish Paritzim.
January 19, 2026 10:48 am at 10:48 am #2500458Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantYYA> He wasn’t a Tzaddik BECAUSE he was a doctor. DESPITE being a doctor,
I will agree that he is not a tzadik “because he was a doctor” – it is clear that he is a special doctor, not like others. But “despite” is taking it too far – gemorah clearly values his services, otherwise who cares that he did not charge … he is special because he used his skills in the right way. It is not just tzniuyut – he does not charge fixed fee, respects dignity by not seeing who pays what, helps young T’Ch who do not have a job yet. judge pretend-swindlers l’tzad zechut, I probably skipped a couple of middos. Maybe I can accept “despite” as – a doctor has an opportunity to charge high fees and be dismissive of patients, he does not do that.
This easily transfers to our life: I asked a related shayla once – why are people visiting cholim are recognized as baaley chesed, while people doing heart operations are seen as “professionals”. The answer (from a yeshivishe rov): if a doctor’s priority is money, then he is a professional; if his priority is chesed, then he is baal chesed. Along the line of the gemorah. I am sure there are people in IDF who are there on a power trip, and there are those who are for the right reasons.
January 19, 2026 10:48 am at 10:48 am #2500459Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantA question on Taanis: so the good doctor gets 7x visits from yeshiva shel maaleh over Abaye.
First, why such unusual “yeshivish” distinction – not Eliyahu talking to him, or golden table in olam habo. I guess this also means that he is not an Am Haaertz DESPITE (tm YYA) being a doctor.
Why are they visiting? do they ask him questions? do they teach him? do they have a pleasere talking to a doctor with middos?And one more: surely in the shamaim they are aware that bloodletting is not as helpful as advertised, so they good doctor might have killed a number of patients – and they still respect him “for the effort”. Or maybe they were coming so often – to warn him not to do bad medicine and save his zechus from the gehinom that was awaiting other doctors!?
January 19, 2026 10:48 am at 10:48 am #2500499anIsraeliYidParticipant@Yaakov Yosef A – I agree with your comment that “Gedolei Yisroel also know how to read Shulchan Aruch”. What I have yet to see from them, though, is an explanation as to WHY, exactly, this particular Se’if in the Shulchan Aruch does not apply to the present situation. A clear, cogent, and logical explanation is called for here – the concept of “it’s so because I say so” is not accepted in Torah except from HKB”H.
an Israeli Yid
January 19, 2026 3:02 pm at 3:02 pm #2500733anIsraeliYidParticipant@YYA – in response to your comment about an ad-hoc group only being what’s allowed – the Rema’s haga’a that ואפילו לא באו עדיין אלא רוצים לבא clearly seems to contradict that, in that it contemplates there being an organized group that goes out on Shabbos so as to dissuade attacks. That definitely seems to imply some sort of organized defense force that can do so – not a bunch of Yeshiva guys with baseball bats.
As to your comment on what the “real goal” of “Secular Zionism” is – you are what the Chazon Ish ZT”L calls a “good Polish soldier”, still fighting yesterday’s battles. The classic secular Zionists are for the most part long gone – the percentage of Israelis who consider themselves Dati or Chareidi is upwards of 30%, with a significant further percentage considering themselves traditional (“Masorati” – not to be confused with the Conservative movement, which has tried to take this term for themselves). Even amongst those that are really secular, the vast majority have no interest in making the religious less Frum – they just want to be left alone to live their lives as they wish, with minimal “religious coercion”. Using an argument that may have been relevant 70+ years ago in today’s situation makes no sense – similar to the way using the Gemara’s description of blood letting as the treatment given by a good doctor to justify such treatment today would be ridiculous.
Bottom line – Zionist ideology is not the reason for Chareidim to serve. The reason, as posited by the original poster in this thread is the Halachic obligation to come to the defense of one’s fellow Jews. As noted above, I have yet to see a logical explanation that explains why this Halacha is not applicable today.
an Israeli Yid
January 19, 2026 3:02 pm at 3:02 pm #2500865Yaakov Yosef AParticipantAn Israeli Yid said – What I have yet to see from them, though, is an explanation as to WHY, exactly, this particular Se’if in the Shulchan Aruch does not apply to the present situation.
No mention is made in the סעיף in question of the necessity or even permissibility of forming a standing army בזמן הזה. The subject matter is הלכות שבת ONLY. If there is a real tactical need to go after hostile invaders on Shabbos, so it is מותר for the ad hoc vigilante committee to go get the pitchforks or the spears or the M-16s and chase after them. No one argues with that. Serving in the IDF involves multiple serious issues that the secular authorities have repeatedly refused to address, despite promising to do so, so the Gedolim called cut. They don’t need to explain it to you. Those who listen to them understand the core issues already, and they have privately explained many things off the record.
January 19, 2026 3:49 pm at 3:49 pm #2500919Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantYYA> Let’s focus on the core issue. Secular Zionism was a highly organized and targeted campaign to destroy Judaism and replace it with a secular national identity.
First, this does not contradict my ramblings. I am not fully condemning the separation that Chazon Ish created (nor I am saying it was the only way to go). It lead to a lot of successes in preserving and expanding observant community. I am just calling to understand what the negatives are. I am not sure Chazon Ish would disagree – he used the word “midbar”. He knew that wandering in midbar is not for your guf and neshomoh. He just did not see other choice. So, logically, by now, 80 years later – 2x more than Hashem’s measure – it is even less healthy. You don’t even have great-grandparents who remember life outside the desert. As an example, when Soviet Jews were coming in 1970s – they had no memory of Jewish life after 60 years of communist erasure, except Jews coming from Lithuania and such – who had “only” 30 years – and they still remembered.
So, I am calling for honest diagnosis of accumulated problems leading to treatment. That’s all.
January 19, 2026 3:49 pm at 3:49 pm #2500917RightJewParticipant@Yaakov Yosef A –
Your comments above smack of intellectual dishonesty, anti-halachic “Reformadoxy”, and delusional alternate reality thinking.
Not to speak of the possibility you are a paid Leftist, Qatari or Muslim troll.
It is utter nonsense to claim that halacha does not require that Israel maintain a powerful standing army to prevent genocide of the Jews.
The Rema’s statement about an enemy that intends to attack has been fully applicable for many years now:
ואפילו לא באו עדיין אלא רוצים לבאAny person with an ounce of brains is aware that the Muslim jihadists have committed themselves to extermination of the Jews in E.Y. for many years.
These are the same jihadists that Satmar and Neturei Kapo RODFIM regularly join in “protests” threatening Orthodox Jews in NYC.
Your real problem is with the Torah, your real problem is not your straw man of “Zionism”.
January 19, 2026 3:49 pm at 3:49 pm #2500914Yaakov Yosef AParticipantAn Israeli Yid
As another Eretz Yisroel Yid, I am well aware of the demographics and society of Israel, and that Zionism today isn’t what it used to be. Something I have stated here many times. However, the סעיף in Hilchos Shabbos is NOT about WHO has an obligation to “defend ones fellow Jews” (at any rate something the IDF sometimes does and sometimes doesn’t, depending on political considerations), nor about whether such an obligation, if it exists nowadays altogether, outweighs Gilui Arayos and GRATUITOUS Chilul Shabbos, among other issues.
January 19, 2026 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm #2500920Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipant> Let’s focus on the core issue. Secular Zionism was a highly organized and targeted campaign to destroy Judaism and replace it with a secular national identity.
2nd, I don’t agree with this. Surely, they were anti-religious and often militant, but was this the main focus? The main focus was to organize as many Jews as possible to support their case and join the movement. They had enough non-religious supporters to look for. Were Hashomer Hatzair recruited primarily from yeshivos? I presume mostly among already numerous non-religious and assimilated Jews, who would otherwise become anarchists or communists.
Do you mean already in Israel? Same – majority of population was not religious and Zionists saw religion as a dying entity.
January 19, 2026 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm #2500925Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantYYA> ad hoc vigilante committee to go get the pitchforks
what is the source of this, maybe I missed it above? Chacham einav b’rosho. We just saw tragically 2 years ago what happens if IDF slips in just one part of the border. Where will your vigilante get F-35s on a short notice – and pilots to fly them. This is actually what Zionists did early in flying european planes acquired any way they could.
January 19, 2026 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm #2500939Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantYYA> pitchforks …. Serving in the IDF involves multiple serious issues that the secular authorities have repeatedly refused to address,
this is what we discussed in another thread about chasing car thieves on bikes. If practicality requires a standing army and the only generals are the anti-religious ones, then you join them and deal with them.
Maybe we can take lessons from medicine: R Soloveitchik in an article explaining YU opening a medical school says that the frummest litvishe towns had two non-religious Jews – a doctor and a pharmacist. It was difficult to deal with them, but there was no other choice, there were no frum doctors. He even says it is harder to deal with non-religious doctors than with non-Jewish ones – the latter show some respect to religion if it is explained to them.
According to your theory, those Litvishe Yidden should have suffered with the doctors. Maybe check R Grozdinsky’s teshuvahs – did he pasken that way.
January 20, 2026 11:45 am at 11:45 am #2500981Yaakov Yosef AParticipantAAQ, RightJew, and friends –
There is an excellent book called “The Empty Wagon – Zionism’s journey from identity crisis to identity theft.” If you have the patience to go through 1390 pages and close to 3000 footnotes, with hundreds of citations from the writings of Zionist thinkers and leaders, you will get a much clearer picture of what secular Zionism was about then, what parts of it still exist today, how and why the RZ and Chareidim dealt with it the way they did, what the Zionists did and didn’t try to do, and to what extent they succeeded in their goals, among many other things that you are often confused about. It is very probable that you will interpret the facts differently than the author does, but you will at least know WHAT THE ZIONISTS SAID ABOUT THEMSELVES AND THEIR OWN GOALS IN THEIR OWN WORDS. All of the quotations include the name of the publication and the page number, if you want to fact check or context check. Reading this would probably change your perspective, if not your opinions themselves. I don’t have time to copy hundreds of pages and then debate the משמעות of each quote and each sugyah. If you are serious you can do the research.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.