Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Profile – 2009 BDS er: Neve Gordon,liar, fascist accused reviving old bloodlibel
Tagged: bds, fascism, Human shields, Neve Gordon, Nicola Perugini
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 4 months ago by RememberThat.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2021 12:09 am at 12:09 am #1994853Shalom-al-IsraelParticipant
HUGGING ARAFAT AS ISRAELIS’ BLOOD FLOWED AT 2002 INTIFADA & LYING ABOUT WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR BOMBINGS..
E. Weiss, Ynet, Feb. 3, 2002:
Niv [Neve] Gordon, in the photo with Arafat, tells Ynet: “I do not know who is responsible for the attacks…” Asked if he felt comfortable embracing the chairman of the Palestinian Authority, who is responsible for terrorism in Israel
SILENCING FREE SPEECH AT HIS CLASS, CASTIGATING STUDENT POINTING OUT HIS BLATANT LIE ABOUT SEPARATION, INCITEMENT
“Studying with Prof. Neve Gordon at the University of Michigan.” Jacob Shrybman, Israel Behind the News, August 25, 2009
In a lecture on November 5th, 2007 Gordon continuously used the term “Jewish roads” to refer to Israeli roads in the West Bank and formerly in the Gaza Strip from which Arabs are excluded. An Israeli student in the large class raised his hand and told Gordon that he was offended by his phraseology and said Gordon was bordering on anti-Semitism by deeming these roads “Jewish roads.” The student described for the class the complete freedom of movement of Israeli Arabs (Arabs with Israeli citizenship) on Israeli roads inside Israel and inside the West Bank. Therefore by calling the roads “Jewish” and not Israeli Gordon was being anti-Semitic. Gordon again simply disregarded the challenge to his biased teaching and appeared irritated.
The same Israeli student that challenged Gordon received a terse email after class that same day from Gordon requesting that the student come see him at his office at an appointment two days later. The student arrived at Gordon’s office and was surprised to see his Graduate Student Instructor (who directly grades the student) present as well. The student cordially greeted Gordon in Hebrew but did not receive the same warm greeting in return.
Gordon then proceeded to berate the student for publicly embarrassing and offending him during class. He belittled the student by telling him that he (Gordon) had been teaching for longer than the student20had been alive and that he had never been embarrassed and offended like that before. Behind closed doors, intimidated by his professor yelling at him, and in the presence of the person who decides his grade, the student quickly apologized and hoped the matter was put to rest. Much to the student’s dismay, in the next lecture Gordon attempted to clear his name and denounced the student’s challenging questions as unfair and unfounded, while publicly humiliating the student. Gordon’s Graduate Student Instructors further dissected the Israeli student’s challenge in the class discussion sections, and referred to the student by name without his consent.
Along with the history of scare-tactics used by Prof. Gordon in order to keep his classroom opposition quiet and disallowing any challenging of his anti-Israel positions, Gordon did not adhere to the tenet of an open environment within the structure of academic freedom. Before speaking in his class, Gordon directed students to state their name. In a large lecture hall this creates an uncomfortable environment for the students to express their own ideas. Gordon uses the students’ names in order to refute their statements or questions while referring back to each of their arguments. As a result, students were reluctant to speak up in the class.
Gordon did not attempt to hide his personal anti- Israel convictions in his teaching of the Arab-Israeli Conflict course. On December 5th Gordon discussed options for the future of the conflict. He referred to the conflict not as the Arab-Israeli Conflict but the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, disregarding the role of the region’s Arab states. When discussing the current political and strategic situation Gordon remarked, “Israel is the occupier, it is in Israel’s hands to change the status quo or not.” When discussing the outcome of changing the status quo Gordon said, “The other consequence is a continuing apartheid regime, leaving 4 million people without basic political rights.” One student challenged his use of the “apartheid” term in reference to Israel. Gordon again dismissed the question and refused to consider any opinion other than his own, bluntly saying “Those are the questions I am not going to answer.”
DENOUNCED BY UNIVERSITY AFTER HIS (2009) PIECE SUPPORRTING BDS
Ben-Gurion University condemns the lecturer: his words are destructive], Uri Binder, Maariv, Aug 23, 2009.</ref>
The university published a condemnation of Dr. Gordon’s article in the Los Angeles Times calling for a boycott of Israel. “Lecturers like him are welcome to look for another home.”HYPOCRISY & FASCISM
Hypocrites at their worst, Aaron Roll, Articles – A database of academic and professional articles, September 4, 2009.
The debates surrounding the wrongful act of a lecturer at Ben-Gurion University are not forgotten. Niv Gordon, a left-wing extremist from the fascist genre, infamous as the human shield of “The Man with the Hair on His Face” Yasser Arafat, in a Muqata in Ramallah during “Operation Defensive Shield”, did so again and published an article in the Los Angeles Times calling for a boycott.. This is not about academic freedom, as they call for a boycott of the State of Israel and the academic institutions in it, first and foremost, thus constraining the existence of the Israeli academy and the destruction of the academy and the freedom of speech in it as a result.
This action by Gordon joins the actions of (many) .. to exert dictatorial-fascist pressure on Israel because their arguments no longer stand up to public logic. For the past 20 years, hundreds and thousands of organizations have been working to fund anti-Semitic anti-Israelis overseas in order to bring the State of Israel to its knees and eliminate it as a sovereign, Jewish, independent entity.
ACCUSED OF REVIVING OLD BLOODLIBEL
Liran Levy, Channel 20, April 1, 2018:
Prof. Niv [Neve] Gordon of Ben-Gurion University, wrote an article for the Al Jazeera network …
The head of the policy department at the “Im Tirtzu [‘If You Will]” movement and a graduate of the Department of Politics and Government at Ben-Gurion University, Alon Schwartzer, responded to the publication, saying: “The use of the term ‘Passover massacre’ by Niv [Neve] Gordon is not accidental. Its purpose is to direct the world of connotations to the most horrific anti-Semitic blood libels against the Jews who have falsely held that Jews practice killing children on Passover to prepare matzah. “Thousands of Jews have been murdered for these lies over the generations and a professor belonging to the Israeli academy is now dancing for it. Gordon is also known for calling for a boycott of Israel. We call on outgoing university president Rebecca Carmi to make amends for her personal career There is only one thing worse than anti-Semitism and that is the Jews who feed it.”
July 28, 2021 10:10 am at 10:10 am #1995265RememberThatParticipantGordon was actually arrested in 2002 for interfering with IDF anti-terror when human-shielding butcher-Arafat.
July 29, 2021 12:31 am at 12:31 am #1995489Shalom-al-IsraelParticipantFASCIST NEVE GORDON – PART II
__
ACCUSED OF ‘RACIST JUDEOPHOBIC RHETORIC’
“The real racism: Expecting Jews to die meekly”, Martin Sherman, The Jerusalem Post, Oct 28, 2011:
Taken from an article by a senior Israeli academic, this excerpt typifies the racist Judeophobic rhetoric that has come to dominate the public discourse on the Israeli- Palestinian conflict.
_____
MORE ON DISTORTIONS OF THIS “PROFESSOR”
Shlomo Saran, “Our Inner Scourge: The Catastrophe of Israel Academics”, Ariel Center for Policy Research Policy Paper No, 171. (Sep-2007 – Tishrei-5768)
Student Complaint about Ben Gurion University’s Neve Gordon.
The lecture began smoothly, with Neve Gordon giving a theoretical explanation of human rights (including the fundamental human right of free speech). It soon, however, turned very political.
He presented a slideshow about the “Separation Wall” and the injustices it causes to the Palestinians. He made many mentions of land being “confiscated” by the Israelis and the “humiliation” caused to the Palestinians due to lack of movement throughout the territories.
On his PowerPoint presentation, he mentioned that parts of the fence were electrified. However, I then corrected him that they were just electric monitors. He conceded on this point.My fellow students and I challenged him on his accusations and he became frustrated and lashed back due to the questions. He said he was more Zionist then any of us on the basis that he lives in Israel (although some in the class, including myself, are currently making Aliya).
He condescendingly remarked that we were just full of American propaganda. He then requested that we stop asking questions and try to learn something.
I made a comment that Israel is in a war and fences and separation are necessary. He then made a comment about how during war millions of Jews were thrown in ovens. I asked him if he was comparing the situation in Israel to Nazi Germany and he did not answer. He then made another comparison of fenced in Palestinians and ghettos in Germany. He also claimed that when Jordan took control of the West Bank it was legal, but when the Israelis won the territory in war, it was illegal.
At the end, I was able to approach him. I asked how he could possibly justify standing in solidarity with Arafat after the Passover Seder massacre. He became agitated and admitted that the picture has caused him troubles.
I then asked how he could sue another professor (at the University of Haifa – SS) for exercising his right to freedom of speech. He responded that we as Americans don’t understand that in
Israel it is acceptable to sue in such a case for libel and that in Israel his case is reasonable…
He left in a huff, seeming very frustrated, annoyed, and agitated.___
WHEN AMNESTY HAD A RARE MONENT OF TRUTH –IN CONDEMNING HAMAS USE OF HUMAN SHIELDS– HE PROTESTED IT
STATE OF PALESTINE: UNLAWFUL AND DEADLY: ROCKET AND MORTAR ATTACKS BY PALESTINIAN ARMED GROUPS DURING THE 2014 GAZA/ISRAEL CONFLICT
26 March 2015, Index number: MDE 21/1178/2015
During the Gaza/Israel conflict in July and August 2014, Palestinian armed groups fired thousands of rockets and mortars at Israel, in many cases directed towards Israeli civilians and civilian objects, in violation of international law. The conduct of Palestinian armed groups, including firing from residential areas and using indiscriminate munitions that cannot be accurately directed at a military target, also endangered civilians in Gaza.
Gordon with his co-author a former al-Jazeera propagandist (Nicola Perugini) argument was based on that supid line of which side lost more, even if ‘Pallywood’ provided figures of so called “civilians” would be true, they do not blame the very inhumane anti-Israel genocidals.
So the duo radicals have worked on a “book” which was exposed:
<en>”How Neve Gordon Identifies with Hamas”. Academia Monitor, Nov 19, 2020.August 1, 2021 9:48 am at 9:48 am #1996178RememberThatParticipantHis co author, Nicola Perugini as al Jazeera employee also lied in 2013 about a supposed meeting at UN which never happened. So reported UNwatch at the time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.