Sonar Ruling Worries Whale Advocates

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Sonar Ruling Worries Whale Advocates

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #588622

    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/11/12/sonar-whales-court.html

    “Sonar Ruling Worries Whale Advocates

    AFP

    Nov. 12, 2008 — The Supreme Court Wednesday ruled the U.S. Navy can continue to use long-range sonar in exercises off the California coast, dismissing arguments that the practice was harmful to whales.

    “Even if the plaintiffs have shown irreparable injury from the navy’s training exercises, any such injury is outweighed by the public interest and the navy’s interest in effective, realistic training of its sailors,” the court said in a written opinion.

    It upheld the case brought by the government which argued President George W. Bush has the constitutional power to exempt the U.S. Navy from environmental laws curbing the use of long-range sonar in the North Pacific Ocean.

    The navy uses just such sonar off California to look for hostile submarines lurking beneath the Pacific, but has dueled with environmentalists for years in federal courts over its use.

    Environmentalists say sonar has potentially catastrophic consequences for marine life, arguing that it has disoriented animals and caused mass deaths in the Bahamas and Canary islands.

    In January, a court required the navy to take safety precautions in the California coast inhabited by five species of endangered whales.

    A few days later, Bush granted an exemption to the navy, arguing the use of sonar was vital for military preparedness exercises that were in the “paramount interest of the United States.”

    Environmentalists took their case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the lower court’s decision in February.

    But the government then petitioned the Supreme Court.”

    What do YOU think?

    #624796

    Another reason I want Bush out…

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.