Therapists”and Mesira

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Therapists”and Mesira

Viewing 45 posts - 1 through 45 (of 45 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1980871
    Nachshon1
    Participant

    More and more we fing stories of therapists who will contact the government without first consulting with dass Torah….
    Is there a site where this is discussed

    #1980909
    commonsaychel
    Participant

    site is called http://www.imatroll. com

    #1980914
    The little I know
    Participant

    Not another thread on this!

    This issue has been tortured in discussion for years. Therapists in the frum community have been thirsting for guidance from rabbonim and poskim for many years. And to everyone’s great fortune, the rabbonim and Gedolei Yisroel have been generous in lending their time to providing this guidance. There are several problems with the OP’s accusations.

    First, let it be known that all rabbonim recognize that the professional is obligated by law to make reports of danger to authorities. In that regard, there are some who direct referrals to “therapists” who have no such secular training, and are not required to maintain professional or ethical standards. However, this practice is frought with risk. These same unprofessional therapists have often had other compromises on their ethical standards, with some taking liberties with their clients that are totally criminal and worse than unethical. You might get interesting medical advice from friends and strangers, but I would rather go to someone with medical training.

    Reporting to authorities is not mesira, and no one gets arrested for raising questions to authorities. If there is evidence of a crime and there is credible suspicion that someone is the perpetrator that is responsible for it, there might be an arrest. Calling that mesira is plain old ignorance.

    Consulting with Daas Torah. Hmm… Anyone I know that consulted with Daas Torah was simply shown the green light. Some rabbonim even questioned why they were being asked. Most situations are that obvious that asking shailos is just a delay in the process. And when the question is more intricate, please tell us who you would consider the appropriate Daas Torah that has the competence to know the subject matter. Just having the expertise in halacha does not guarantee clarity of the subject.

    This OP question, often asked, is hardly intended to obtain an answer. Rather, it is a veiled attempt to throw a baseless accusation at the mental health field. We have read the stories. I have yet to hear one that should not have reported. The frum therapists are far more Torah oriented than is implied by the OP.

    #1980916
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    Who is “the government”?

    #1980956
    ujm
    Participant

    Indeed their is an obligation to ask a Posek a shaila before reporting to a government entity. And the OP is correct that it isn’t always done. But true frum therapists do ask first. And follow the Psak issued.

    But, of course, it is vital before choosing a therapist to research through rabbomim if said therapist being considered asks shailos first. If not, one needs to find another therapist.

    If the halacha is that it is forbidden to report a person, any Jewish therapist cannot report even if the secular law is otherwise, as halacha takes precedence when it is in conflict with non-Jewish laws. And in these matters it is certain there are times and cases where Jewish law and local non-Jewish laws disagree.

    #1980962
    The little I know
    Participant

    ujm:

    You are presenting a narrative,, and I believe that a good bit of it is untrue. Let’s take it apart.

    First – define mesira. This is about police reporting. It involves the alleged or suspected commission of a crime. This would involve arrest and potentially prosecution. And there are certainly times when this is the matter at hand. But there are numerous others. I suggest you seek some numbers for how many reports to State Central Registry are rejected, how many do not involve arrests, and what percentage do. Then tell me how many of these were in violation of a psak halacha (or would have been had a shailoh been asked). Not all government entities are subject to mesira.

    Next – research the therapists to see if they ask shailos. Enjoy your sleuthing. Every single frum therapist would respond in the affirmative to such inquiry. Whether they actually do is another thing. How about if they already know the answer? Many therapists actually do, having spent considerable time with noted poskim, reviewing the parameters, and are experienced in knowing when the answer is simple or complicated. These therapists then pose the challenging ones for psak halacha. I have yet to hear of a single instance where a frum therapist went against such a psak or acted without having learned from poskim how to conduct their work.

    I was not addressing instances where secular law conflicts with halacha. I will quote several poskim, notably Rav Dovid Cohen shlit”a of Flatbush, who paskened that a mandated reporter is obligated to follow secular law, and should report anything that the law of land requires. You may call Rav Dovid to verify this. He stated this publicly many times.

    Lastly, your narrative usually assumes that the average posek is qualified to respond to these shailos. Well, that is actually not true. Most are not, and will usually refrain from responding. Do bear in mind that the typical shailos you are implying are double edged swords. There is either an obligation to report or it is completely ossur. The determination of the fact pattern is not made by the posek, but rather by the professional.

    You should connect with some poskim who are versed in issues of mental health. They are typically connected to several professionals, and have amassed a great deal of experience in these matters. You can voice your concerns, and you will discover that the narrative has quite little merit.

    #1980966
    ujm
    Participant

    TLIK: Potential examples of mesora is reporting to, say, the police or to ACS (CPS). Lack of arrest does not make it not a mesora case, if the net result is the entity (police, CPS, etc.) will stick governmental power, even outside of detention or seizure of children, to make Jewish family lives miserable.

    Suspicion of a crime that lacks knowledge thereof, does not permit disregarding the halachos of mesira.

    At the very core, when the local non-Jewish laws mandate reporting (i.e. a mandated reporter) in insurances where the halachos of mesira are applicable and prohibit reporting, a Jew is bound by the halacha even though the secular law is otherwise.

    #1980988
    IYK
    Participant

    I have a lot to say on the subject, but for some reason, my post wasn’t posted.
    Mesira is being used as an excuse by abusers to get away with abusing their victims. I was a victim of abuse and take this subject quite personally, as I see how many years of therapy it took to overcome the childhood trauma caused to me. I was spanked at 3 years old. I hadn’t even gone to school, mimicking my own parents to learn and got spanked for learning to be like them. Makes absolutely no sense at all. I was taught to harm myself and commanded to do so by my own parents. A cycle of hatred that took over 10 years of therapy to break. It’s anti Torah as the foundation of Torah is to love oneself so that they can love others like they love themselves. There is no excuse for spanking, there is absolute necessity to do “Mesira” to prevent abuses from continuing.

    #1981172
    The little I know
    Participant

    ujm:

    Again, narrative. Have you studied the halachos? Your blanket statements are simply untrue and not in accordance with halacha. No one says that these authorities do not inflict misery on the families they deal with. In fact, they get things wrong a lot of the time, and people suffer in the interim. I agree that these agencies should probably be replaced. But the issues we are confronting here are pikuach nefesh, and the many poskim I’ve discussed things with have acknowledged this openly. The fear of involving the authorities is based more on the chilul Hashem factor if word leaks to the public that such crimes occur within the community, and even more if there was a yeshiva that was derelict in protecting their students. But the mesira issue has been addressed by the Gedolei Yisroel, and has been put to rest by halachic authorities far greater than you or me.

    Your last paragraph is totally inaccurate. Poskim have ruled clearly that mandated reporters must report.

    Lastly, you were referring to “mesira”, which you see as evil, not “mesora”.

    #1981224
    ujm
    Participant

    TLIK: The mesira issue is live and viable and has not been put to rest. It is a serious concern and consideration in all cases.

    And mandated reporters are forbidden to report if it is mesira. And in some real cases it applies.

    (“mesora” was a spell-checker [inaccurate] correction. It obviously should have read mesira. And it isn’t I who sees mesira as evil; the RBS”O declared so in His halachos.))

    What I stated here and above is halachicly accurate and applicable.

    #1981246
    IYK
    Participant

    Halacha is determined after true understanding of Torah. Just because someone decides abuse is allowed doesn’t mean that Hashem wants it to happen. In fact, ask yourself why the bais hamikdosh was not rebuilt in over 2000 years. If we were doing the right things, it would have been rebuilt already. Clearly, “Jewish” people are not wanting it back. If you want the temple restored, embrace the fact that you still don’t know right from wrong and be the change.

    #1981242
    IYK
    Participant

    You cannot possibly believe that the abuses are what the RBSO wants. There is a clear reason the beis hamikdosh has not been rebuilt. In over 2000 years, we as a people have learnt nothing. Using the name of hashem to protect abusers is very wrong.
    That being said, I plan to publish my story of abuse in anti Semitic newspaper if that’s what it takes to eradicate the evils that are being protected by this community. As by protecting the abusers, you have validated what they do, automatically taken a side. Their side is evil. Unfortunately, it seems that evil will have to combat evil. So sad that the point is lost.

    #1981316
    Avi K
    Participant

    Are you kidding? It is an explicit halacha that it is permitted to report someone who is endangering the community even if it is only economically (CM 388,12 with Rema). See also seif 3 regarding someone who is compelled by the authorities to do so. Rav Moshe even permits being a tax auditor and turning over Jewish cheats as that is the person’s job (IM CM 92).

    For a fuller discussion see “Gray Matter IV, Beit Din, The Mesirah Dilemma – Sefaria” online.

    #1981350
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    IYK- i am more than sorry for your unexcusable life experiences. The long effects of abuse is something people don’t understand. That being said, ujm/joe does not represent nor speak for “the jewish people”. Is there a reason that you decide to focus on his twisted posts instead of focusing on TLIK’s postings? Why accuse the community of being like minded with ujm?
    And to threaten us with going to anti semites with your story? How will that help stop abusers? How will you feel having the blood of any future victims of that group on your hands for fueling their fire?
    The community needs advocates. That’s how we make xhange. We need advocates to stop people like ujm from getting his kicks posting (and reposting) these things online. We need advocates to educate parents how to identify and assist the abused child, we need advocates to tell authorities how to stop sheltering abuse. We need advocates to protect abuse victims from being triggered by internet trolls. Do you really want to be part of change and out these people, stop them, make sure they lose access to kids, educate the communities and help victims? If you do, then call and volunteer. They need you.
    And if you are not yet healthy enough to help, then please, please call them anyways for support.

    #1981371
    The little I know
    Participant

    IYK:

    I want to support the comment to you by Syag. Your experiences were horrible, and everything that can eradicate such atrocities from our community is a chiyuv.

    Syag was also correct in noting that ujm speaks from a fanatic position that is inconsistent with the halacha as stated by the Gedolei Haposkim. It is to be noted that there is room for more progress. And I am correct in pointing to the narrative that gets believed by many who are otherwise ignorant. That is similar to the reams of nonsense that permeate the ugly world of politics and the wretched mainstream media.

    Allow me to pretend to be a therapist for a moment. This thought might actually help you. The abuse field contains activists. Some are fanatics, others are responsible individuals who contribute their time and effort toward resolving this serious issue. You have the experience of being victimized. There are two directions you can take from here. You can be a victim, or you can be a survivor. The former leaves you with a prevailing sense of rage, negativity about self, and the desire to exact revenge against perpetrators and anyone perceived to support or protect them. These are painful feelings, not bad ones. However, they anchor the victim into the mud, and push deeper until emerging from the “blotteh” is all but impossible (without help). The alternative is to be a survivor. This is the dimension that Syag suggested, to get involved in constructive activity to reduce the problem. You can define the niche in that realm that is most suited for you. And professional help is extremely helpful.

    It is not easy for an outsider to dictate to you how to get out of the mud, though professionals trained in trauma work tend to be adept at this. I won’t direct you where to place your energies and efforts. But the ditch of revenge is not a useful place to get stuck. The perps might get what they deserve, but that won’t get you unstuck. I have no problem seeing these murderers of young people’s innocence and stability locked up for life. Our community should be protected from them. But that will not contribute an iota to your happiness or diminishing the negative feelings. Activism does not mandate being a fanatic. Try becoming a survivor. You will recognize the uselessness of feeding garbage to the anti-Semitic media that will accomplish nothing. I, for one, would like to see your efforts be fruitful. Become a survivor.

    #1981405
    IYK
    Participant

    I believe that public speaking with question and answer session is the key to overcoming the problem. I’m more than prepared to get up and speak if there is a desire to hear my point of view. I just need guidance on where in the community to turn that will give me the right podium.

    #1981399
    IYK
    Participant

    I really want to help other victims escape abuse. Revenge solves nothing, as abusers only pass the revenge on to their victims. But how do I find leaders who stand up to denounce the horrors of abuse? I’m glad that some people took notice now that I didn’t see any other options than to take this to those who would act. I would back down and be helpful if guidance of who to go to can be posted. I struggle still financially and have little community support to change that. I no longer hate, but if there is no one to turn to, I must go to anti Semitic sources. I don’t want to, but being one voice, with no backup, is not possible to succeed. I want to share my story where it matters, if such a place exists. But I have yet to see it. Any guidance of where my voice will be heard within the community would be very appreciated.

    #1981517
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “I’m glad that some people took notice now that I didn’t see any other options than to take this to those who would act.”

    Nobody took notice because of your threats, we took notice because of your pain.

    “but if there is no one to turn to, I must go to anti Semitic sources. I don’t want to, but being one voice, with no backup, is not possible to succeed. ”

    Im sorry, i don’t appreciate your threats, and honestly i can’t even fathom your point in going to jew haters to fix an abuse problem. There are several advocates for abuse victims in the jewish community and I cannot make the shidduch for you because i don’t know you. I would recommend calling amudim and telling them what you need or want to do to help and ask them for direction.

    II sincerely wish you peace and healing.

    #1981563
    IYK
    Participant

    I wish to bring to light that the victims are being focused on when abuse cases are exposed. In reality, the victims may need therapy, but the abusers need even more therapy than the victims need. As a former victim, people think, 10 years may not sound like much. But that ten years consisted of well over one thousand sessions. It was actually closer to one thousand five hundred sessions. If you look into how much a therapist actually charges, you begin to know the extent of damage that one victim is caused by abuse. Most people don’t have one hundred grand to put down to pay for all that therapy. That’s just the therapy aspect. Forget the cost of being maxed out on some six different medications when the doctors finally told me that the only option left in the book was lifelong hospitalization. If I hadn’t begged a certain relative to advocate for me, I would not have a voice today and probably would be dead already. Medication alone matched the price of the therapy. Are the abusers paying $200,000 for damages? Nope. How about loss of financial opportunity? How many years of work was lost to go to that therapy? People have no clue yet and it is not public knowledge how much damage is caused in reality per person that is abused. Think it over. Does it makes sense at all? I think it doesn’t.

    #1981584
    IYK
    Participant

    During the time I was working, still dealing with abuse, I had been earning approximately 50 grand per year on my first job. My earnings potential would have been even more had I been raised properly. I’ve lost work potential of well over $500,000 plus let’s not forget the cost of over $130,000 for hospital visits during my experience. I mean this story has racked damages so far told of over $800,000. Needless to say, I have never been more harmed by any other senseless act than abuse has done to me. I can keep going, but I believe my point has been made. Abuses are not a sustainable way to continue in society.

    #1981618
    The little I know
    Participant

    IYK:

    Your math is ok, but you did not include some monetary value for the damage to your emotion and spirit. You are correct in noting that true compensation is impossible. It is not about punishing the abuser, as deserved as it may be.

    #1981620
    ujm
    Participant

    Let’s not conflate accusations or allegations of abuse with actual abuse. While at times they coincide, at other times they do not.

    #1981629
    IYK
    Participant

    To all the posters showing support and to YWN I appreciate what you are doing here.

    UJM:
    My abusers claimed to all that my accusations were false and made up. Others backed them and shunned me for speaking out. If I wouldn’t have the power of a mandated reporter to back me, the abuses would have gotten worse. If it’s only allegations, why would anyone be afraid of the police finding out the truth? It would expose the issues of the one making false accusations. But a mandated reporter has more training than you can possibly know of to tell when there is risk. By the trained therapist being a voice for those that can’t yet speak for themselves, it only has positive outcome. Both ways it’s a positive outcome. Have you thought that at one point because of all that was done to me, I did not see the beauty in living another day? Do you know how many times I went to sleep praying I should not wake up in the morning? Do you know that I attempted twice to end my life because people wouldn’t listen to me? I know that life is worth living because I see how much the world gives for us to live. But when faced with such challenges, it’s hard to see that the world only gives us food water wood for houses and the many other gifts including animals giving their entire bodies so we can eat the meat from that, because humans deserve more than we were told. I used to sleep on the floor because I thought I didn’t deserve better than to be treated as a dog, because that’s how people were treating me. We need to stand up for therapists and the abused, because if their job to report is infringed, it will lead to bad endings. I am thriving now that I love myself, but how can we go on ignoring over one million dollars in damages per victim? We need to be the change, or the very society that allows us to live freely will collapse under this strain alone.

    #1981633
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    I feel like a lot of people on this thread would call the investigation into the murder of Laibey Kletzky HY”D mesirah.

    #1981635
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Oh really? Alot of them. You are just beyond senseless. Did you bother reading the posts or do you just jump to frum conclusions?
    And yes, you owe most of us an apology.

    #1981637
    The little I know
    Participant

    I’ll make one more try at stating this simply.

    Mesirah is not a good thing. There is no debate on that. There are instances when it is mandatory – according to halacha. Yes, halacha mandates that we access the secular authorities. Contemporary Poskim have spoken about this openly, and their piskei halacha are available. So mesirah is a double edged sword. It is either ossur or it is a chiyuv.

    To the believers of the narrative that it is always ossur, you have a few problems. First, that halacha says differently. Secondly, as noted by the Gedolei Haposkim, we lack the competence to assess the credibility of an accusation. We cannot jump and accept it is certain guilt, nor may we dismiss it. We need to see to it that these is an evaluation to determine the veracity of the report. I have yet to encounter a single Rav anywhere that has the training to accomplish this.

    To IYK:

    You suggested that the needs in this situation should override halacha. That is unnecessary. Halacha speaks to that, and our poskim who know all about mesirah have told mandated reporters to fulfill their professional responsibilities. I will follow their direction any day, and ignore the rantings of those who wish it wasn’t so. In summary, mesirah can be following halacha.

    #1981663
    ujm
    Participant

    “we lack the competence to assess the credibility of an accusation”

    TLIK: The Gedolei HaPoskim disagree with you. Rav Elyashiv paskened l’halacha, that accusations/allegations *cannot* be reported to any secular authorities — even by a “mandated reporter” — unless and until a *halachic assessment* on the particular case alleging abuse meets the level of Raglayim L’Davar (credible evidence — again, based upon halachic criteria of Raglayim L’Davar determined by a competent Posek.)

    OTOH, mandated reporters, in contravention to halacha, are mandated by secular law to report any allegations even if it lacks credibility. This is a direct conflict between Halacha and non-Jewish/secular laws. For Jews, halacha must take precedence.

    #1981662
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: The real problem is that a lot of people think mesira no longer applies. That the halacha was repealed and stricken from the law books.

    You know the deal, America, 21st century, new era, goldene medina, out with the old in with the new, things are different here, dawn of a new era where unfashionable halachos that are disagreeable with our modern sensitivities and how we think the goyim will perceive them and our practicing it makes it necessary to declare them obsolete (with some sophisticated sounding pretext, of course.)

    Frankly, it is no different than the Reform/Conservative approach.

    To those with any intellectual honesty, please cite real examples of when the prohibition against mesira would be applicable in America today.

    #1981664
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: The real problem is that a lot of people think mesira no longer applies. That the halacha was repealed and stricken from the law books.

    You know the deal, America, 21st century, new era, goldene medina, out with the old in with the new, things are different here, dawn of a new era where unfashionable halachos that are disagreeable with our modern sensitivities and how we think the goyim will perceive them and our practicing it makes it necessary to declare them obsolete (with some sophisticated sounding pretext, of course.)

    Frankly, it is no different than the Reform/Conservative approach.

    To those with any intellectual honesty, please cite real examples of when the prohibition against mesira would be applicable in America today.

    #1981708
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “mandated reporters, in contravention to halacha, are mandated by secular law to report any allegations even if it lacks credibility”

    False

    #1981718
    IYK
    Participant

    UJM:
    Perhaps the conservative/reform approach is when those misinterpret the Halacha so they can have sick moments of fun at the expense of those who don’t have the ability to defend themselves.
    In true abuse cases that the victim is scared to death to speak out, “raglayim ledavar” may not be available until they escape it themselves and the damage is already done. At that point, there is no “raglayim ledavar” available in the form of visible bruising or scars. What stops these sick abusers from repeating the offense to others in this fantasy world of yours? Have you ever heard of the sixth chelek shulchan aruch called common sense?
    You want others with intellectual honesty to speak. Where’s yours?

    #1981724
    IYK
    Participant

    Perhaps a separate topic asking when mesira applies today would address the issue for UJM. But the headline of this topic clearly is therapists and mesira.

    #1981742
    ujm
    Participant

    Syag: Perhaps in your Illinois not. But in many states mandated reporters are required by state law to report any allegations, irregardless of whether the mandated reporter finds the allegation non-credible or improbable or suspect or unlikely or a serious possibility of being untrue or exaggerated.

    #1981744
    ujm
    Participant

    IYM: “raglayim ledavar” is the halachic criteria set by the Gedolei HaPoskim as to whether or not a secular report may be made. As it is a halachic determination for each situation, a halachic authority needs to be consulted on a case-by-case basis.

    #1981745
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    You are being more literal than any reporter would be. If that were the case you would have to call the cops if some kid says, “oh man, my parents are gonna kill me”

    #1981749
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “At that point, there is no “raglayim ledavar” available in the form of visible bruising or scars.”

    IYK- there are many other ways to establish raglayim ledavar outside of those markings. And unlike ujm’s understanding, there are halahic determinations that can be case by case without requiring asking a shaila each time.

    #1981775
    ujm
    Participant

    This is from the official Agudas Yisroel statement (issued on July 22, 2011) regarding Posek Hador HaRav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv’s Psak Halacha requiring Raglayim L’Davar before it is permissible to report an allegation:

    <i>As Torah Jews we live our live our lives in accordance with halacha. The question of whether and under what circumstances one is halachically permitted or required to report to the authorities suspicions of child abuse (including sexual molestation) has attracted the attention of a number of our generation’s most prominent rabbinic authorities…

    Where the circumstances of the case do not rise to the threshold level of raglayim la’davar, the matter should not be reported to the authorities. In the words of Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, perhaps the most widely respected senior halachic authority in the world today, “I see no basis to permit” reporting “where there is no raglayim la’davar, but rather only ‘eizeh dimyon’; if we were to permit it, not only would that not result in ‘tikun ha’olam’, it could lead to ‘heres haolam…

    Thus, the question of whether the threshold standard of raglayim la’davar has been met so as to justify (indeed, to require) reporting is critical for halachic purposes. The issue is obviously fact sensitive and must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

    There may be times when an individual may feel that a report or evidence he has seen rises to the level of raglayim la’davar; and times when he may feel otherwise. Because the question of reporting has serious implications for all parties, and raises sensitive halachic issues, the individual should not rely exclusively on his own judgment to determine the presence or absence of raglayim la’davar. Rather, he should present the facts of the case to a rabbi who is expert in halacha and who also has experience in the area of abuse and molestation – someone who is fully sensitive both to the gravity of the halachic considerations and the urgent need to protect children.<i>

    #1981776
    ujm
    Participant

    From an interview with Rabbi Chaim Dovid Zweibel, Agudas Yisroel, in Mishpacha Magazine, August 3, 2011, pages 30-31:

    Q: What happens if there is a clash between the law of the land and the halachah? Does dina d’malchusa dina prevail?

    A: I think those clashes will be few and far between. The secular law in New York State mandates you to make a report if you are on their list of categories and have “reasonable cause to suspect.” Under the guidelines of Rav Elyashiv shlita and other gedolim, raglayim I’davar comes mighty close to “reasonable cause to suspect.” They are so very close in my opinion, that I don’t envision frequent clashes between the secular law and the halachah. Where a conflict could arise would be in a case where a rav says not to report, but the person’s lawyer says he must. In that case, I suppose part of the process of the sh’eilah to a rav could also be where the person goes back to the ray and says, “You told me not to report, but my lawyer says I have to, so does that in any way affect your psak?” The moreh hora’ah will then have to decide how that fits in with the overall equation in determining his final answer to the sh’eilah.

    Q: Wouldn’t the requirement to consult with rabbanim first delay the reporting process, thus leaving children at greater risk?

    A: Under secular law you are required to report promptly according to the statute. Even under secular law, if an inexperienced pediatrician sees something that makes him nervous, he may wish to consult with a more experienced doctor. Senior law enforcement officials have told me that such a consultation does not conflict with the law. Where the process outlined by the gedolim under raglayim I’davar requires consulting with a rav first, a conflict might arise if that consultation would interfere with the immediacy of a report, but it should not delay the process any longer than the length of time it would take for two doctors to discuss the case between themselves.

    #1981826
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Thank you for supporting my point

    #1981833
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    ujm- i think you ate playing a game of semantics and over time I’ve come to wonder if it’s less about trying to cause a ruckus and more about you really seeing things this way. Just to establish a baseline here of your viewpoint, if you find out that there is unquestionable (videos, witnesses, admissions) evidence that a well respected man abused several children ch”v what would you like to happen to this man?

    #1981836
    Avi K
    Participant

    Ujm, sometimes the opposite is true. Secular law prohibits a professional to speak out because of professional confidence (an example would be an attorney) but Halacha requires him to do so.

    #1981616
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    According to the laws of mandated reporting, if a person works in a day hab program for special needs adults, and discourages them from engaging in inappropriate relationships or the like, one who observes this must report the employee, as this is illegal infringement on liberty. The same would apply to voicing opinions about to’eva relationships.

    I’ve worked in such settings and have seen the documents one must sign.

    To say that one must always report whatever a mandated reporter is charged with telling sounds to me like whichever rabbonim concluded such were/are misinformed.

    #1981861
    IYK
    Participant

    UJM:
    I will repeat my unanswered question to you and expect an answer that is truthful.
    What stops these abusers from repeating these offenses to others in this fantasy world of yours?
    You are claiming through the name of Torah and the name of the creator of the world that these offenses must go on and that the abusers need to be left with zero consequences for their actions. This is a very bold statement and I wonder if you are pro abuse? I actually wonder if you are an abuser yourself? But what I wonder doesn’t matter here. What matters is truth. What matters is defiling the name of god, the name of other rabbis as well, for the selfish purpose of destroying the world and it’s beauty. To prevent chilul hashem by protecting abusers, you and your kind are in actuality doing the very thing that you are saying not do to to you. You are making such a chilul Hashem by spreading false information as the truth.
    Please answer my question. What is stopping these abuses from being repeated in this fantasy world that you are portraying as the way of Torah and the word of god?

    #1981865
    ujm
    Participant

    Syag: If there is unquestionable (videos, witnesses, admissions) evidence that a well respected man abused several children ch”v then almost certainly he should be reported. Remember, Al Pi Halacha reporting to secular authorities is to secure one goal — namely, stopping him from causing further abuse. Theoretically, if that could be accomplished another less severe way, without reporting, we would have to use the alternative. But in such cases it is unlikely to accomplish that goal with any other method. As such he is to be reported.

    That all said, if we’re talking about a case where a (real) victim brings up a case of his/her teacher who (really) abused him/her 18 years ago as their teacher in school when they were a child, and today that teacher is a feeble old man who can’t leave his old age home without a wheelchair, then almost certainly it’ll be forbidden to report him.

    #1981888
    IYK
    Participant

    My first realization that what I was taught was incorrect, came in the form of a dilemma. My dad was claiming that anything he said, I had to do because of Kibbud Av. Failure to do so, would result in gehenim, a new world of suffering. I was being told to do things that I was unable to do. Did that mean that god was going to also be cruel to me because of my incapability to do what my father told me and I would be going to hell? I couldn’t believe that hashem was that cruel. I asked a rav about it. I got an answer. But I still was not protected from the abuses. Rabbis have not protected me. They were fully aware that I was being abused and I told another rabbi as well about what was happening at home long before the psychological abuses were noticed by me. Again, failure to protect the victim, yet claiming to be rabbis. This is why Jewish rabbis are no longer respected in the non Jewish world anymore and we are hated by so many people. We are even turning our own away to become non Jewish because the truth is many are not worthy of the name rabbi.

Viewing 45 posts - 1 through 45 (of 45 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.