To accept all children

I once heard from Rabbi Rabinowitz zl who was the controller of Yeshiva Torah Vodaas that yeshivos don’t close because there’s no money. They close because they don’t have students. That in turn causes a lack of funds. Nobody will donate to a dying yeshiva or a yeshiva known not to accept children because they don’t have money to pay tuition. Of course the yeshiva can’t normally have too many such non-payers. But yet this seems to be only in non-chasidish yeshivos. Almost all the chasidish yeshivos and bais yakovs accept every child from their sect, with or without funds. And make up the difference from the rich members of the chasidic sect.

Agree!!

This is why Aish Hatorah is supported by the wider Jewish community. They accept people in with the knowledge that they won’t see a penny fortheir education, BUT when the graduates make money, Aish is at the top of their list, both for their education and to ensure that future Aish students will be treated the same way that they were.

Schools who are mentchlich with parents and students reap the benefits in the long run. The schools who pressure and extort as much as possible win in the short term, but once the family isn’t FORCED to pay, they’ll never see another red cent.

Your question therefore runs deeper:

IF A SCHOOL IS SO DISRESPECTED IN THE COMMUNITY THAT THEY CAN’T RAISE THE REQUISITE FUNDS TO ENABLE ALL CHILDREN WHO NEED FINANCIAL ASISTANCE TO ATTEND IS SUCH A SCHOOL SERVING A PURPOSE, OR IS IT NEEDED FOR THE PRINCIPAL’S EGO?

Agreed. As frum Jews dont we believe that Hashem is running the show? What seems likely to happen in the future, let Hashem deal with, and He will. And how would rejecting one child keep a school open?

*kapusta*

Let’s try to figure this out. How much more does it cost to have 22 kids in a class than 20? The Rebbe/teacher gets paid the same. The mortgage is the same. The electric, gas, utilities are the same. Most of the books are from the Board of Ed or the Parents pay for, so what exactly costs more?

OK, I understand when the class gets too big and it needs to be split and another set of teachers need to be hired or another building needs to be rented. But as long as there is room in the class there is no reason to turn a child away especially if the yeshiva is working with the community and the community will work with the Yeshiva. I think that is the biggest problem today and that is why so many yeshivas are not being supported by the community. Each yeshiva is autonomous and doesn’t have to answer to anyone and in many cases there is no one to talk to when you have a problem. The answer given to most parents is they can take their child out if they are not happy. If the Rosh and administration rules the parent body and the neighborhood instead of working with the local Rabbonim and the parents for the success of the children then the community is not likely to support the school. WE had a school like that in our community. The Rabbonim complained that the 2 principals did not take any direction and did not care what the local Rabbonim had to say and only took direction from their own Rav who didn’t live in the community. Needless to say the school closed.

HIE: Yes Torah Vodaas is prime proof of what I said. Rabbi Rabinowitz said this to my father and I in 1967. The situation today isn’t good, granted. But there are still many wealthy people around. If a wealthy man sees a yeshiva that has students and functions, he’ll donate funds. To Gavra: the chasidic system only works for them? It’s not good here? Where is here? Is it because chasidim have the achdus to maintain a community based system of paying? Whereas the yeshivishe community doesn’t have enough ahavas yisroel achdus to accept a child from a talmid chochom father who is out of work? If so, that “It is a good system for them, but is not applicable here”, wherever “here” is, you have a much bigger problem erev Rosh Hashonoh than a tuition crisis.