Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Tznius in front of Non Jews
- This topic has 49 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by potsandpans.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 27, 2010 4:55 am at 4:55 am #592228potsandpansMember
I read once in a halachic discussion online, where a posek said that women may sing before non jews because there is no issue with kol issue with a goy.
I am wondering if the same applies to dressing tzniusdikly: if a girl wants to go to an exercise class where there are also men present( and verified as non jews i.e african americans)and she wants to wear exercise clothing( i.e. sweat pants) is that a problem halachicly?
August 27, 2010 5:05 am at 5:05 am #694615HelpfulMemberAre you kidding re: being non-tznius in front of goyim??
Btw, where/who did you hear kol isha is ok in front of a goy?
August 27, 2010 5:10 am at 5:10 am #694616whatelseisleftMemberdoes yoseph robinson ring ANYY bells at all?
he’s been nifter stam a week and we can’t remember him and remember his story?
if anything we should learn from him that
“( and verified as non jews i.e african americans)”
is completely and utterly a WRONG attitude.
i expected better from the cr.
August 27, 2010 5:51 am at 5:51 am #694617popa_bar_abbaParticipant“( and verified as non jews i.e african americans)”
is completely and utterly a WRONG attitude.
i expected better from the cr.
I don’t know. We do follow “rov” in many circumstances. If it makes a difference whether the man is jewish (I am not aware either way),
It is possible we would follow rov in this case.
I don’t know why any Jew of African descent would even find that offensive. There is no slight being intended nor delivered.
August 27, 2010 8:29 am at 8:29 am #694618d aMemberwhatelseisleft, I was thinking of the same thing (not exactly of Yosef Robinson HY”D, but on the same lines).
However, “potsandpans” was asking about something else (which I won’t comment on.)
August 27, 2010 11:33 am at 11:33 am #694619aries2756ParticipantI don’t know whether this is a problem halachicly or this is an excuse some husbands have made up to allow their wives to go swimming with them in the Bahamas, but I have heard it hundreds of times as well. The point being of course is whether there are Jews around or not, Hashem is EVERYWHERE!
August 27, 2010 1:45 pm at 1:45 pm #694620Dave HirschParticipantReb Moshe says that a Yirei Shomayim shouldn’t let his wife go to an all-woman beach where the lifeguard is a man.
August 27, 2010 2:26 pm at 2:26 pm #694621apushatayidParticipant“I am wondering if the same applies to dressing tzniusdikly”
What happened to Siman Beis in shulchan aruch?
August 27, 2010 2:47 pm at 2:47 pm #694622gavra_at_workParticipantWhat happened to Siman Beis in shulchan aruch?
I have been asking myself the same question since yesterday when Chossan uncovered an apparent contradiction in Shulchan Aruch.
On one hand, a person must dress with Tznius. MB says this includes socks (at least when they did not wear pants).
On the other hand, a person can read (and be Yotze) Kriyas Shema bare-chested. Tefilla, the MB says, requires additional Kavod (Omed L’Fnei Hamelech) and a shirt. No mention of socks, etc.
Again, the key word in Siman Beis is “L’Olam”. Ask your LOR for actual practice.
However:
Simin Beis is based off (BY there) a Gemorah in Shabbos 118B:
??”? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?????
Seems like this was a Hanhaga that R’ Yosi did that he was M’Shabach himself for it, and the Tur/SA suggests we do the same as well.
Also see Rashi on the Gemorah there.
August 27, 2010 3:10 pm at 3:10 pm #694623HelpfulMembergavra, I don’t see any contradictions. It isn’t saying its okay to prance around bare chested. But ipso facto if he already said kriyas shema like that, the shema was yotza.
Siman Beis is halacha l’maaisa like every other part of SA.
And it is clearly 100% assur for a woman to be untzniusdik in front of a goy or otherwise.
August 27, 2010 3:21 pm at 3:21 pm #694624oomisParticipantOne should never be untzniusdig in front of ANY man, goy or Jew (except for that person’s spouse and only when not in niddah). Either one is tzniusdig or one is not. Period.
August 27, 2010 3:45 pm at 3:45 pm #694625noitallmrParticipantHmmm interesting Shaylah i think- it really depends on what the issur of being Untzniusdik Brabim is- if its because your Michshal other people than Lichora a goy would be muttar but if its got to do with the woman herself than should be ossur.
Dunno!!!!!
August 27, 2010 3:49 pm at 3:49 pm #694626gavra_at_workParticipantgavra, I don’t see any contradictions. It isn’t saying its okay to prance around bare chested. But ipso facto if he already said kriyas shema like that, the shema was yotza.
I wish it would be that simple. The SA says Mutar Likros, meaning L’chatchila.
And it is clearly 100% assur for a woman to be untzniusdik in front of a goy or otherwise.
Source? And please don’t say shoshanas whatever that MR brought (or anything similar).
Not that I disagree. But I would like to see it inside a Real Sefer from a Posek.
August 27, 2010 7:38 pm at 7:38 pm #694627mw13Participantpotsandpans: Never heard that one before. As always though, all halacha li’maseh shailos should go to your LOR, not the CR.
noitallmr: I would imagine that both reasons are valid.
August 27, 2010 8:29 pm at 8:29 pm #694628HaQerMemberI have no idea what the actual halacha is. According to my understanding the laws of tznius can be relaxed in an all-women environment. I have no idea whether there is a problem around non-Jewish men. There is probably a chumra not to even if it is halachically allowed but that is just a chumra, not necessarily halacha.
As an aside (and to open another can of wormy fish), I have a feeling that sweat pants may not be as big of a problem as short sleeves/skirts. Although frum women are noheig not to wear pants in public, I don’t think it is as big of a halachik issue as actually uncovering a part of the body that is considered erva and there might therefore be leniencies in this particular situation. (Many frum women doctors will wear scrubs at work even though it is pants).
The bigger problem would be the fact that she is doing exercise in front of men which itself is usually not very tznius no matter how tzniusly she is dressed. Therefore I think the question should be rephrased to is it OK to exercise in front of a confirmed non-Jewish man.
BTW, I see no problem with the comment of “( and verified as non jews i.e african americans)”. If an African American converts to Judaism he is probably not attending exercise with women. The poster just meant that it is obvious that the men are not Jewish. With whites there is a greater chance that the man might be an assimilated Jew and it can be hard to verify while by African Americans you can probably rely on Rov.
August 29, 2010 3:54 am at 3:54 am #694629smartcookieMemberIf you understand the reason why we dress tznius, then this wouldn’t be a question.
You don’t want any man’s eyes on you. Whether yid or non jew.
August 30, 2010 3:00 am at 3:00 am #694630Sister BearMemberOf course it’s not ideal but I heard that it’s okay to if you need to or want to for whatever reason.
August 30, 2010 5:27 am at 5:27 am #694631HelpfulMemberClearly being untznius in front of a goy is 100% assur as it is “pritzus”. The only exception is a nochri lifeguard, since he is a life saver. See Igros Moshe EH 4:62:1.
August 30, 2010 1:24 pm at 1:24 pm #694632SJSinNYCMemberHelpful, a doctor is ok too.
August 30, 2010 1:39 pm at 1:39 pm #694633gavra_at_workParticipantClearly being untznius in front of a goy is 100% assur as it is “pritzus”. The only exception is a nochri lifeguard, since he is a life saver. See Igros Moshe EH 4:62:1.
Where does it say Nochri in the Teshuva?
It does not, BTW.
2: Rav Moshe says it is MUTAR not Assur. He says a Yaras Shomayim should not be there if/because she should be worried that the male lifeguard will follow the female home (which even Rav Moshe says is remote). He does not have a problem with the lifeguard per say.
Did you ever actually read the teshuva, or are you just quoting (like I have called out others (the same person?)).
Still looking for a source.
August 30, 2010 1:39 pm at 1:39 pm #694634Dr. PepperParticipantSJSinNYC-
Not all doctors 🙂
August 30, 2010 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm #694635Ben TorahParticipantgavra_at_work: My reading of the teshuva indicates he says it is mutar ONLY by something like a lifeguard. The clear implication, as I read it, is that normally it would be assur. Otherwise there would be no need to say it is mutar by a lifeguard.
August 30, 2010 1:56 pm at 1:56 pm #694636gavra_at_workParticipantBen Torah:
Interesting. My reading says that the issue Rav Moshe is worried about is Yichud, not Tznius. He specificly states that since it is a woman’s swimming pool there is no problem of tznius. His issue seems to be the Man’s issur and Yichud.
End story, ask your Rav. But this is not a source.
August 30, 2010 2:01 pm at 2:01 pm #694637dunnoMemberI have heard that just like male doctors are all allowed so are male hairdressers. Would it be ok for a married woman to have her hair cut by a man? I’m not trying to pick a fight here; I’m curious.
August 30, 2010 2:21 pm at 2:21 pm #694638oomisParticipantA doctor is there to save your life. And btw, I personally try to get female docs, as much as possible, though in some fields, that is more difficult than others.
Hairdressers OTOH, are not a necessity of life, but a nice luxury. You can always chop off your own hair, but you cannot take out your own appendix. I would not go to male Jewish hairdresser, there are so many females in the field, there is no justification for doing so.
August 30, 2010 2:43 pm at 2:43 pm #694639apushatayidParticipantRegarding Hairdressers.
Masseches Kiddushin.
?? ??,? ???? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ??????? ….. ???????
August 31, 2010 4:11 pm at 4:11 pm #694641bptParticipantThis story was printed in one of the Maggid books (or I heard it on a R’ Krohn tape) and addresses the importance of tznius among goyim:
(this is the abridged version)
Germany 1939 – Teen girl is left to close up house and then meet up with family out of town at grandparents house in a few days (where the rest of the family is, till things “cool down”).
Heat turns up. Teen thinks, now is time to go, but how to avoid being spotted? Decides to “loosen hair, open top button, ect” so she looks less jewish.
Stops short and thinks about what momma said, “affileh far de fir vent darf men zech shaimen” (even for the 4 walls, you have to act with modesty).
Pulls hair together, closes button and heads for Grandmas place. Trip is uneventful, but quite scary. Upon arrival, she tells momma about the choice she made. Smart move says momma, reaching for and pulling on the chain around teen’s neck. Had you gone out with an open button, your mogen dovid (or some other very jewish pendant, not sure which) would have given you away.
Bottom line: Tzinus is always the best route (and always listen to momma!)
August 31, 2010 4:18 pm at 4:18 pm #694642blinkyParticipantYes, I heard this story too. It brings out the point beautfully.
September 2, 2010 3:14 pm at 3:14 pm #694644blinkyParticipantBy the way, the goyim notice that we dress differently and some really respect it. It shows how special we are when we act and dress more refined. I was in a department store last summer and a security guad asked me how come we dress in long sleeves in the summer. I wasnt gonna give him a whole hashkafah laesson so i just said something about modesty- I think he was impressed. It was a good feeling to know that we are noticed that we dress more refined.
September 2, 2010 8:02 pm at 8:02 pm #694645bein_hasdorimParticipantp&p, that’s ridiculous! a yiddishe woman has to be tznius in front of anyone goy or yid. but when alone something else.
talking about dress & behavior.
September 2, 2010 9:28 pm at 9:28 pm #694646apushatayidParticipant“Tznius in front of Non Jews”.
I think the title for this thread is wrong.
Does it matter if the person in front of you is a co-religionist or of the same gender? Shivisi hashem linegdi tamid.
I use the following rule of thumb. If I wont do it/dress that way in front of my boss, I sure as heck am not doing it in front of the ribbono shel olam.
September 2, 2010 10:10 pm at 10:10 pm #694647rockerMemberTznius is about the person him/herself not about who they are dressed infront of.
September 2, 2010 11:02 pm at 11:02 pm #694648smartcookieMemberTznius is about the person him/herself not about who they are dressed infront of.
It sure is about who they are in front of and who sees them.
September 2, 2010 11:07 pm at 11:07 pm #694649aries2756ParticipantSometimes I respond and my reply is not posted. I guess the moderators feel something i said is inappropriate. In my humble opinion, I feel some of these topics are inappropriate. If someone is serious about this question maybe they should ask it privately of their own RAV. I am sure there are teens that read these posts and they might take some of the comments as “good enough” fact to go ahead and do the deeds even though we are just posting opinions here and not psakim. So I don’t think that posting this question whether it is Halachicly correct or not is appropriate because regardless if the halacha mentions a “goy” specifically it is inappropriate behavior and not something one should consider OK unless they themselves got a heter from their own Rav.
September 3, 2010 2:33 am at 2:33 am #694650sof davar hakol nishmaMember“Tznius is about the person him/herself not about who they are dressed in front of.”
it’s both. there are two concepts in tznius. 1) in front of others (which applies more/mostly to women)and the shayla once came up if girls can go swimming near a guest house that was being built by goyim (and they could see in a little) and it was – assur. 2) in front of Hashem. In front of yourself
September 3, 2010 6:39 am at 6:39 am #694651rockerMemberI meant tznius is about the person him/
herself not about who they are
dressed infront of, so it doesn’t make a difference where you are you’ve still got to be careful.
September 3, 2010 8:24 am at 8:24 am #694652MoqMemberCertainly, Da’as Yehudis is a social principle; aka one of dignity. One woman (and a man, in a different context) must maintain her dignity at all times. In an all-female environment, one may maintain her dignity even when dressed differently then in the street. This applies to every single place and enviroment a woman is in.
Each situation has it’s daas yehudis. I understand there is a modesty which frum women have when swimming amoung themselves; this too would be daas yehudis.
One certainly loses dignity when being exposed in front of non-jews- unlike when around women. Hence, daas yehudis would forbid it. Forbidden, even in the Bahamas.
Beyond that, we have the dorasayah aspect of lifney iver. Lifney Iver does apply to a non-jew, as well. Hence, we have the multitude of issurim regarding causing a non-jew to worship avodah zara, to the point the beis yakov forbids business parntership with an akum; worrying that it will lead him to swear in the name of his god. Worry not, the Remah permits it based on the fact that non-jews are not prohibited from Shituf (aka christianity) – who leaves out the shaala of paganism.
We find a machlokes haposkim as far as if non-jews are obligated in hirhur relative to a woman who is forbidden to them. I presumably the lifney iver is contingent on that. Of course, the question continues of trey avrey d’nahar, which I wonder how to apply to modesty. Presumably trey avrey d’nahar always applies (aka creating issur and non merely facillitating it).
I would find this, therefore, to be forbidden (I didn’t see R’ Moshe, but I presume that his permission for a male lifeguard is based on tarud b’malachto, just like a doctor. I would be hesitant to apply this to a hairdresser; surely enough intelligent bais yakov girls become shaitel machers? In Israel, I have heard that charedi beaches often have male lifeguards, based on the fact that beach requires additional strength to pull a woman out of the water, and therefore they are mekel – even though they could easyily hirer female lifeguards)
September 3, 2010 2:19 pm at 2:19 pm #694653oomisParticipantWhy would it require extra strength to pull someone out of the water, as all bodies are buoyant? That’s the same logic that kept women who chose to go into firefighting out of the field (and takeh, THERE I could see that strength should be a requirement, but at the beach???).
September 3, 2010 3:04 pm at 3:04 pm #694654bptParticipantrequires additional strength to pull a woman out of the water, and therefore they are mekel.
You mean to tell me, the female israeli is strong enought to be drafted and do army work (as good, pehaps better than some men), but cannot do lifeguard work?
Yeah, right.
September 3, 2010 3:27 pm at 3:27 pm #694655haifagirlParticipantWhy would it require extra strength to pull someone out of the water, as all bodies are buoyant?
I don’t know for sure, but I’m guessing it may have to do with the frum women wearing robes and such when they are swimming. Add the weight of those water-soaked clothes, it may require extra strength.
As I said, I don’t know, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that were the case.
September 3, 2010 3:40 pm at 3:40 pm #694656apushatayidParticipant“I meant tznius is about the person him/
herself not about who they are
dressed infront of, so it doesn’t make a difference where you are you’ve still got to be careful. “
You misunderstood my point. I use my boss as a point of reference for myself. It has everything to do with how I would act/dress/speak in any given situation.
September 3, 2010 7:20 pm at 7:20 pm #694657YW Moderator-42Moderatorapushatayid:
“Tznius in front of Non Jews”.
I think the title for this thread is wrong.
Does it matter if the person in front of you is a co-religionist or of the same gender? Shivisi hashem linegdi tamid.
I use the following rule of thumb. If I wont do it/dress that way in front of my boss, I sure as heck am not doing it in front of the ribbono shel olam.
Do you take showers in front of the RBS”O? Would you take a shower in front of your boss?
There is an inyun to always be tzanua but different situations call for different levels. Women are allowed to exercise. They are even allowed to dress less tznuis while exercising among woman. The question of the OP is whether this less tznius form of dress is OK in front of non-Jewish men.
September 5, 2010 5:38 pm at 5:38 pm #694658oomisParticipanthaifagirl, you just answered why women should not be overly-concerned with tznius in front of other women, if they are wearing clothing over their bathing suits that could potentially cause them to drown. That might be thought of as being a tznuah shotah.
September 6, 2010 3:30 am at 3:30 am #694659potsandpansMemberOkay, I believe my question was VERY misunderstood! im not suggesting that women act/dress untzniusdkly in front of goyim…my question stemmed from fact that I am aware that there are many women who attend exercise classes that are taught by a male teacher or a big class( i.e 40 pp) some of which are male who attend the class as well….
I was wondering if halachiclly there was a leinency for this…thats why I asked if there is a chiyuv to dress tzniuskdkly in presence of goyim….
I know also that many school productions where girls act, dance and sing and there are male workers working the lights, and curtains…and seems like the schools have no issue with that…
so I was wondering if perhaps there was a heter for these girls
to wear pans( when they dance) in front of these workers, because
that is what they do!
September 6, 2010 3:33 am at 3:33 am #694660so rightMemberpots, what makes you sure that the male classmates (in the dance school or exercise class) are not Jewish? and secondly the heter described by others above attributed to R. Moshe seems to apply to something like a lifeguard specifically since that is a potentially pikuach nefesh situation.
September 6, 2010 11:23 am at 11:23 am #694661MoqMemberNah…those cases are pretty much tarud b’melachto; it would be permissible even in front of Jews (he is focused on making a production/class and not on his students dress. Of course, this applies only during the class – before, after & any social connection and the like would have normal rules of tzinius). This is why we permit women to see male doctors in all settings, even if a female is available, and there is no pikuach nefesh (say, elective surgery & the like- a different schmooze as well) . Presumably, this would apply to lifeguards as well. Still, women presumably are more comfortable around a female staff.
I wonder though, about other attendees (not the instructor) of the class. They presumably are not tarud b’melachto, and may merely be attended the class for it’s fringe benefits. Presumably, if it is not an all-female class, it would be problematic.
Of course, even the instructor, this means you can assume his mind is elsewhere. Of course, if it’s clearly not, based on comments & actions – then it would be forbidden.
Again, I see no difference between Jews & Non-Jews. Jews who are professionals in these areas are permitted to interact with immodest women, based on the heter of tarud b’melachto. Of course, a Ben Torah should choose his profession with brains. I’m not sure if women’s clothing designer is what a Ben Torah does for parnassah (try astrophysics. Much more fun. And you get to play with explosives. And no women – except in astronaut suits, which are pretty tzinius. Meah Shearim is actually going to bring in a few.)
As far as pants…that’s a different schmooz. Di L’Tzara B’Shaato.
For all practical applications, please speak to your LOR. This is theory only.
And you can see the subtle & slippery slope here. Bnos Yisrael who keep tzinius in all settings around men are certainly in the geder of ??? ????.
September 6, 2010 12:59 pm at 12:59 pm #694662apushatayidParticipantMod 42. For the record, the answer to your question is yes. Perhaps I wasn’t clear. Let’s forget for a moment how the woman is dressed during excercise, the act of excercising in and of itself it in many cases not tzniusdkik. The question should really be, are the laws of tznius somehow different in front of non jewish men with excercise being just one example.
Regarding males at a female production, I remember seeing in the igros moshe that under extenuating circumstances (in the case of the shayla it would have caused a tremendous machlokes in the area) men would be allowed to attend as long as the girls were less than 11 years old, if older he held it was assur. Bli neder later today will provide the source in igros moshe.
September 6, 2010 2:25 pm at 2:25 pm #694663apushatayidParticipant“Okay, I believe my question was VERY misunderstood! im not suggesting that women act/dress untzniusdkly in front of goyim…”
Isnt excercise by its very nature acting in an untsniuddik manner? Personally, I dont do much excercise (as my belly can testify) so I cant speak from first hand knowledge, but from excercise book ive tried to read, it seems much of the excercise done, and certainly at classes would entail acting in an untznius manner including bending and twisting the body in all sorts of ways probably not intended naturally.
September 6, 2010 2:26 pm at 2:26 pm #694664apushatayidParticipant“thats why I asked if there is a chiyuv to dress tzniuskdkly in presence of goyim”
If you worked in an all non jewish company, would you be permitted to dress in a manner not conforming to halachos of tznius? I’m just not understanding where non jews enter the equation.
September 6, 2010 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm #694665potsandpansMemberthe reason i brought up “non Jews” vs. Jews is because there seems to be a distinction between the two in terms of Kol Isha- i heard from reliable source that there is not issur for a jewish women to sing in front of a non jew because issur of Erva is only for a jewish man.
i was wondering if there was a halacha that i myself was not familiar with that perhaps was an extension of the concept that Erva not an issue with a a goy, that gave the heter for women to attend exercise classes, where they wear pants, and have other males attend the class as well.
I also gave the example with the production, because many of the workers who work the lights and sound are not doing that the entire time, only at certain segments of the show, the rest of time tehy are watching the girls act/dance/sing…so I though perhaps there was a leinency that i was not familiar with?
Someone brought up the question of how one verify that the males were non jews- that is why my original question included the example of african americans attending the class( and for those who converted, they are not attending exercise classes with women)…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.