Yom haatzmaut and sefira

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Yom haatzmaut and sefira

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 66 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2539129
    simcha613
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s a coincidence that HKBH orchestrated events that Yom Haatzmaut falls out during the time period where we’re supposed to doing self reflection and fixing the terrible crime of not treating one another with respect. Vehameivin yavin.

    #2540069
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Simcha613

    You’re correct, but if you follow most of the posters, and really most people, frum and otherwise, they’re convinced that they’re perfect and would never consider anything to the contrary. So no, they don’t view the Sefira as a period of reflection, rather it’s to criticize others.

    #2540074
    ujm
    Participant

    We mourn on this day and c”v do not listen to music or make weddings.

    #2540110
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To simcha613

    ujm is a Jewish antisemite who dreams of the destruction of the State of Israel and the death of its Jewish residents. And he justifies this position because his Rav, Rabbi Miller was anti-Zionism.

    #2540360
    ujm
    Participant

    Simcha: I always get a chuckle when a non-Orthodox Jew who attends a Reform Temple, like qwerty613, calls Torah Jews antisemites and lies about their positions. The inversion is ironic.

    #2540372
    HaKatan
    Participant

    @simcha613:
    The Zionists – even “religious” ones – celebrate and party on that invented “holiday” despite it falling out during sefirah.
    The Chazon Ish stated that the day should really be a Tish’ah BiAv.


    @qwerty613
    :
    No frum Jews – not even NK – have ever advocated for the death of the Jews in the Zionist paradise. Your comment is disgraceful.

    #2540719
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    HaKatan said:

    “The Chazon Ish stated that the day should really be a Tish’ah BiAv.”

    __________________________________________
    MY RESPONSE:

    I have no evidence that he really said that.

    If he did say that, then in what year did say that?

    The Chazon Ish died in 1953 CE,
    when the State of Israel was 5 YEARS OLD.

    1953 CE was 73 years ago. Since then, many things have changed.

    Changes that HaKatan & UJM refuse to acknowledge, because they prefer to hate.

    #2540746
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM and HaKatan- for those who believe the Hakamas HaMedina was a monumental, miraculous, and hashkafically significant event, then indeed it is a serious Halachic quesiton on how we balance the joy and Hakaras Hatov of that day with the nihugei aveilos in wake of the tragic death of the Talmidei R’ Akiva.

    But your focus on that Halachic controversy completely misses the point I was making… the whole reason for the tragedy which led to the deaths was their disrespectful treatment of one another. So the Halachic positions that both of you espouse, while not unimportant, are not accomplishing the underlying purpose if you are still comfortable calling Dati Leumi Yidden reform and “religious” (with quotation marks).

    And that was my point… the fact that Yom HaAtzmaus falls out during this time period may be no coincidence. It may be a message from HKB”H that while the halachic and hashkafic debates surrounding the medina and it’s role in the ultimate geulah are significant, we can’t let that devolve into horrific levels of disrespect… like calling Dati LeUmir Jews irreligious, kofrim, or reform… or, for that matter, calling Charedi and anti-Zionist Jews names like anti semites and Sonei Yisroel. I don’t think this is a one sided critique…we can debate, and debate passionately. We can be convinced that the other side is completely wrong on this topic… but we have to put things into perspective… this is the time of year to fix the hate and the disrespect.

    #2540748
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Hakatan

    What do they ask for?

    To ujm

    Yes, and the two Rabbis of the Temple are Rabbi Plutchok and Rabbi Fishelis. Which Nazi is the head of your shul?

    #2540863

    two ideas:
    1) it is entirely possible that two things hold true: 1.1) foundation of Israel is a great thing, 1.2) the way it is celebrated is not right.

    2) it may be not yom haatzmaut has a problem, but sefirah?
    indeed, the most popular version – fist 33 days – clashes with yom tov and month of nissan.

    #2540864
    [email protected]
    Participant

    @simcha613

    you’re missing the point BECAUSE you are not part of Am Yisroel.

    The Torah demands we Jews love every member of klal yisroel and hate every rebel that is out, regardless of their name, “notrzi” “reform” “dati leumi” or whatever.

    Fundamental to your zionism is the idea that we are all – chilonim, notrzrim, reformim, mesoratim, and (lehavdil) yiddin – one single group and we just have different lifestyles or a plurality of viewpoints.

    But, no. Torah Judaism rejects all other religions, especially the “av ha teema” called “religious zionism”. We are not “one nation”, we fully reject any connection with those who claim that the zionist state is “Jewish”. We pray for their destruction and downfall three times a day, as per the established prayers of anshei kenses hagedola.

    We hate those who hate Hashem because the Torah tells us to.

    #2540867
    HaKatan
    Participant

    @SQUARE_ROOT

    Since then, the disaster for Jews that is that idol has grown infinitely worse.

    For example, back then, the yeshiva students at least had some legal framework to remain Jews and learn in yeshiva, unlike now.
    Since then, the heretics have shmaded multiple generations of Jews, probably numbering in the millions.

    But you know all this and, unlike your projection accusation (false as always), you wish to worship the idol.

    #2540869
    HaKatan
    Participant

    @qwerty613:
    However G-d chooses to handle putting an end to the nightmare of that idol without the loss of any Jewish life at all.


    @simcha613
    :
    People also believe in trees and cows. They are worshiping idols. Same here.
    It was very much non-miraculous, and monumental in only the opposite way: as in the greatest triumph of the satan since the sin of the golden calf, as per the Brisker Rav.

    Again, as Rav Elchonon and the others put it, Zionism is idolatry and “Religious Zionism” is idolatry and religion together. That is the reality. Should we pity a brainwashed “Religious Zionist” due to that brainwashing and not hate them? Of course; nobody suggested otherwise. But the Torah cannot be adulterated.

    In case it still isn’t clear, what would your reaction be if someone tried to claim that the reason that Easter Sunday falls out on Pesach is whatever? The answer is that Easter Sunday is not relevant to my religion, so the question simply doesn’t start. Same here.

    #2540885
    HaKatan
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions

    “two ideas:
    1) it is entirely possible that two things hold true: 1.1) foundation of Israel is a great thing…”

    In the Jewish religion, that isn’t at all possible. The founding of the “State” was a violation of the entire Torah (as per the Brisker Rav) and obviously of the Oaths (which the idolaters have obviously never managed to explain away). It also has shmaded untold numbers of Jews and on and on and on. It also prevented (and is preventing, according to some) Mashiach from coming. And on and on.

    #2540888
    Duvidf
    Participant

    Mathematically if all the Torah Jews in Israel would vote, and all the Torah jews of the world come to Israel and vote, they would be hands down the largest and ruling party. Hence in this day and age no matter what the original founders of the state had in mind it is the Torah Jews in Israel who refuse to vote and the Torah Jews of the world who refuse to move to Israel and vote who are solely responsible for the continued secular rule in the state of Israel. In this day and age all the problems of the anti state of Israel Torah Jews are mostly self inflicted.

    #2540896
    simcha613
    Participant

    It’s sad, but I guess people will believe what they want to believe, especially if it gives them an outlet for their sinah. As controversial as Zionism (and specifically Religious Zionism) is, it’s not idolatry. It’s not reform. It’s not Christianity. It doesn’t violate the 13 ikkarim of the Rambam. It’s a debate in how to learn a small Gemara which isn’t even brought down lema’aseh by most of the Rishonim.

    Yes, many of the Gedolim in the past called it Avodah Zara, but it’s clear that was an exaggeration. Early Zionists were anti religious and dangerous. Jews were choosing between Yahadus and Zionsim… it was a huge threat like reform and like the haskala. The Gedolim came out strong, as they should have. But bH their fears were unfounded, and other Gedolim came out in support of combining Zionism, Eretz Yisroel, Torah, Halacha, and Avodas Hashem.

    That doesn’t mean that’s the right path. I mean, I hope it is… but this is a machlokes leshem shamayim. And I think that’s the message of Yom HaAtzmaus being when it is.. .to remind us that we shouldn’t take it too far. Both sides need to treat each other with respect or we risk facing the same tragedy as Talmidei R’ Akiva whose disrespectful behavior was I’m sure leshem shamayim (or at least they thought) Religious Zionsist ARE part of Am Yisroel. Their Gedolim ARE Gedolei Torah. It’s not comparable to Christianity or Easter. This isn’t shmad.

    Take that message or leave it. I’m not Gadol. I get chizuk from the idea that Hashem is trying to aid us in repairing the damage that passionate machlokes brings. But this is going to go in one ear and out the other for many of you. Because to those failing to heed the message of sefire, I am but a kofer who embraces Toras Eretz Yisroel, Yishuv Haaretz, Hakamas HaMedina and the hope that maybe this is the Kibutz Galuyos and the beginning of our Geulah.

    #2541001
    GadolHadofi
    Participant

    qwerty,

    The head of Joseph Goebbels’ pagan temple is “Harav Yitzchok Ehrentreu”. If you’ve never heard of him that’s because our resident Nazi fabricated him, just like all of the garbage he posts.

    #2541147
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To GadolHadofi

    His fellow Sonei Yisrael Hakatan, stated that he davens for Hashem to eliminate the State of Israel, but not to harm any Jews. Let’s examine that line. Hitler yms said that the Jews are responsible for all the evils of the world and they must be eliminated. He then followed up on his belief. Hakatan and ujm say that Zionism is responsible for all the evils of the world and it must be eliminated, but then he says that he doesn’t want any Jew to be harmed. At least Hitler wasn’t a lying hypocrite. It’s shocking that monsters like ujm and Hakatan can mention Hashem.

    #2541218
    [email protected]
    Participant

    @simcha613

    unfortunately you’ve drunk the kool-aid of zionism and you sound just like @rescue defending humanism or every secular chazer-fresser defending reform.

    the idolatry of zionism has very little to do with the gemara of shulosh shevios, rather that is just one of the many starting points. this is like saying the whole issue of xitianity is about whether yashke was from beis duvid or not.

    but, like “jews for j”, your zionist leaders will tell you that all the tears and mesiras nefesh from gedolim of past was simply a machlokes of shitos, and that their criticisms were against the secular, not the religious. Nonetheless, those gedolim where very explicit that this has nothing to do with shitos or machlokes (in Torah) and the focused targets and war those gedolim waged were explicitly against the priests teaching “religious zionism”.

    #2541302
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To simcha613

    You’re one of the good ones and you’re also intelligent enough to understand that there’s no way to get through to those who have created a wall of hate. I’m reminded of something I read many years ago. There were German and Austrian Jews who were taken to the camps, and they displayed the medals that they earned in WWI hoping that this would gain them their freedom. Obviously, the guards weren’t impressed. Nothing can be said to our resident Nazis, Hakatan and ujm, that will make any indentation. They’ve distilled the Torah into hating anything related to Israel. And as for rescue, he’s also severely disturbed, but he’s more nasty than hate filled.

    #2541358

    katan> Again, as Rav Elchonon and the others put it, Z

    could you do us a favor – you already enlightened us about view of R Elchonon. He is a respected T’Ch surely, student of Chofetz Chaim, tragically killed by Nazis when he stood up for his principles and stayed by his students … still, would be nice if you can quote, say, R Feinstein, Chofetz Chaim, Hazon Ish, R Soloveitchik other rabbis of different shitot.

    #2541359

    duvid> Mathematically if all the Torah Jews in Israel would vote, and all the Torah jews of the world come to Israel and vote, they would be hands down the largest and ruling party.

    this is very aspirational… but what if all form different parties and start fighting with each other for power and subsidies? if say, “chasidim” and “misnagdim” both get 40% of the vote, are you sure one or both of the groups not join with “hilonim and “aravim” against the other?

    #2541382
    HaKatan
    Participant

    @qwerty613:
    It is you and your idol that are the definition of “sonei yisrael”. The Torah is the life-force of Jews, and your idol has been trying to destroy the Torah for over a century.

    The Brisker Rav stated that he (and everyone) prays thrice daily for the (peaceful) elimination of the idol, which is the viLaMalshinim prayer in 18. If you have a problem with that, you can take it up with him.

    Your “examination” and calling others “nazis” is beyond absurd (and perhaps somewhat of a projection, but only Hashem knows).

    Just drop the idol already and stop falsely accusing people and writing nonsense. Just acknowledge that the only power is Hashem and that He does not need anything to help Him and His children, not even your idol.

    #2541457
    simcha613
    Participant

    Qwerty- I agree and disagree with you there.

    Obviously, I have many disagreements with ujm, and katan, and somejew and the like… I disagree with their conclusions about the religious zionism and medinas, and I am absolutely disgusted at the way the view and refer to fellow Jews who disagree with them on the subject.

    BUT, I like to believe it’s a machlokes that comes from a good place. They believe their position is Ratzon Hashem and what’s best for Klal Yisroel. Unfortunately, they are far too committed to that position and are willing to believe lies about the medina and denigrate fellow Jews in order to substantiate that position to themselves… But the position itself starts in the right place. Denigrating them and calling them horrific names like Nazis and anti semites is the exact same problem that I have with them. That’s not what they are, that’s not the kavod they deserve… And even though you and I agree about fundamental issues, I do have to protest how you talk about our bar plugsas.

    #2541629
    RightJew
    Participant

    Those who are mourning on Yom Haatzmaut, like UJM and Hakatan, are true to their Islamic religion which mourns the Jewish victories over genocidal Arab Islamo-Nazis.

    No doubt Arafat and company also mourned on Yom Haatzmaut.

    The very goyish invented “religion” of UJM, Hakatan, and co. prohibits music during sefirah, but there is nothing in the Talmud, Rambam, or Shulchan Aruch about music being prohibited during the sefirah days.

    The very goyish invented “religion” of UJM, Hakatan, and co. also prohibits creation of a Jewish state before Moshiach, but there is nothing in the Talmud, Rambam or Shulchan Aruch prohibiting creation of a Jewish state before we have a Moshiach.

    UJM, Hakatan, and the N.K. gang are forced to invent a polytheistic replacement theology, where a “Satan” runs the world, in order to erase this mitzvah from the Torah:

    “וְהוֹרַשְׁתֶּ֥ם אֶת־הָאָ֖רֶץ וִֽישַׁבְתֶּם־בָּ֑הּ כִּ֥י לָכֶ֛ם נָתַ֥תִּי אֶת־הָאָ֖רֶץ לָרֶ֥שֶׁת אֹתָֽהּ׃
    And you shall take possession of the land and settle in it, for I have assigned the land to you to possess.
    ” (BaMidbar 33:53)

    The miraculous military victories Israel has achieved with the help of Hashem do deserve a day of celebration.

    #2541729
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To RightJew

    I certainly concur with everything you said, but AFAIK music is prohibited during Sefira. Please elucidate.

    #2541734
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Simcha613

    As I stated, you are clearly a Mensch, as am I and so I will respond in a civil manner. Today, Hakatan said to me, “It is you and your idol that are the definition of sonei Yisrael.” And the other day ujm called me a Mechallel Shabbos who prays in a Reform Temple. When I make statements, they are well thought out. I have consistently called rescue an atheist because that’s what he is, and that’s what he’s espousing. Now it’s telling that you addressed your comment to me and not Hakatan. The reason is obvious, you know that I’m rational and he isn’t. If you tried to get him to tone down his rhetoric, he’ll respond as he did to me. Sorry, you’re giving them the benefit of the doubt, but the fact remains that they are incorrigible. There is no hope for idolaters of any type. I’m not pushing you off, because you clearly have a Lev Tov, but these animals must be treated as such.

    #2541753
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    HaKatan:

    No offense intended, sir, but with all due respect, you are disconnected from reality.

    You are NOT LISTENING to the comments made in this Coffee Room.

    A wise man once said, because it is true, that:

    “You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.”

    #2541829
    simcha613
    Participant

    Qwerty- thank you for the response. I still disagree with the nasty name calling, but I understand where you’re come from… and the rhetoric coming from that side is reprehensible to say the least… That was the very point of my original post.

    #2541870
    HaKatan
    Participant

    @SQUARE_ROOT
    With all due respect, it is the Zionist idolaters, including those who quote nebulous Artscroll quotes from 70 years ago, that are “disconnected from reality”.

    Zionist shmad is very real, and it is idolatry and heresy, as all the gedolim noted.
    As you quoted, “You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.”

    #2541911
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To SQUARE_ROOT

    After you straighten out Hakatan, you can convince Lubavichers that the Rebbe isn’t Moshiach. We’re talking about full-fledged idolaters. By definition, they can’t be reached. They’ve all crossed the fiftieth level of Tumah but they think it’s a joke because Schneerson told them that he’s going to save every Jew.

    #2542010

    simcha> They believe their position is Ratzon Hashem and what’s best for Klal Yisroel.

    putting aside the cursing that some other people also do, they are not demonstrating intellectual honesty that is required for a kosher point of view. They continuously quote several rabonim and pretend that everyone else thinks the same. It may be that some of them read some secondary seforim that provide the “analysis” they are putting out here, so they are not directly responsible for non-sequiturs, just being mislead. This is the best letzad shut I can come up with.

    #2542327
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To simcha613

    I usually don’t get involved in threads involving Zionism, because the NK supporters come out and there’s no point in arguing with them. All that happens is that it leads to name calling.

    #2542429
    HaKatan
    Participant

    AAQ:
    It is the idolater that are dishonest. No, there is no dissenting rabbinical opinion, certainly not on the level of Rav Elchonon, the Brisker Rav, the Chazon Ish, the Imrei Emes and the rest.

    Only an idolater could try to claim there is any rabbinical permit to that (or any other) idol which has as its goal the destruction of the Torah and replacement of Judaism with Zionism. That should be obvious even in theory, but is all the more obvious if you simply follow the news and the cataclysmic damage the heretics have done to Judaism and Jews.

    #2542466

    > After you straighten out Hakatan, you can convince Lubavichers that the Rebbe isn’t Moshiach.

    funny! and after that come here and help any of us to change one middah and make this place more pleasant …

    #2542671

    AAQ> … still, would be nice if you can quote, say, R Feinstein, Chofetz Chaim, Hazon Ish, R Soloveitchik other rabbis of different shitot.
    Katan> No, there is no dissenting rabbinical opinion,

    thanks for your answer.

    #2543006
    amosak
    Participant

    I am not a talmid chacham or a poseik- just an older zaidy with terminal cancer who davens that I will live long enough to be zocheh to count sfirah again next year.
    I think most of you who have enteted comments here have forgotten WHY we are noheig aveilus during sefira, or at least why the talmidim of Rebbi Akiva died. It was because they lacked kavod for one another! I think some of you who have written here could teach Rebbi Akiva’s talmidim a thing or two about how to attack one another with a lack of kavod! Shame on you!

    #2543147

    amosak, exactly! refuah shleimah.

    #2543259
    user176
    Participant

    Hakatan ujm and somjew, your opinions are despicable. Literally writing off half of the Torah observant Jewish population as a different religion or idol worshipers.

    People today are so misguided. When you look at what the goyim believe in today, it makes so little sense that we feel like we’re in a twilight zone. The way I see it is that Hashem has blinded them to the obvious, but once He reveals himself it’ll be so easy to reverse course from their ridiculous potions, everything will be clear as day.

    But you guys, who have taken your Hashkafa to unimaginable, equally ridiculous and backward, levels. Who continuously disgrace half of am Yisrael every single day, will have a very hard time adjusting to the reality that those people you thought weren’t even Jewish in fact may be offering your korbanot for you in the Bet Hamikdash!

    You’ll never have imagined that someone who considered themselves a Zionist pre mashiach may be teaching the laws of tumah v’tahara to YOUR children.

    For Hashems sake would you quit calling me a goy and oved avoda zara because I don’t think like you or I follow Rabbis that you don’t on a hashkafic point that has nothing to do with Halacha. It’s literally sickening. You don’t realize how gross it is to open a thread during th Omer and read the things you’re writing here. The vast majority of Jews would find your words outrageous and completely oblivious to concepts of shalom and ahdut.

    The worst part, that all this is wasted words. You’re all so thick headed, for years and years the same thing over and over. Hashem yishmor. Enough will never be enough with you people.

    #2543843
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To user176

    Actually, you understate their level of depravity. They consider every Jew living in Isarael except for the handful who carry Palestinian flags the enemy. In addition, they consider all Jews in Chutz Laaretz who refuse to denounce the state as Zionist idolaters. What follows is that they only believe that a few hundred Jews in the world are Kosher. As the Gemara says, “It’s an upside-down world.”

    #2543851
    [email protected]
    Participant

    @user176

    It’s a shame that you are more interested in attacking the messenger than learning the Torah being taught.

    You sound like a reform when asked why don’t keep shabbos and told that breaking shabbos means they are no longer part of klal yisroel. “most jewsteins would find that statement of chazal abhorrent!”

    yet you still wonder why the cries of gedolim have always been specifically against the “religious” branding of zionism, now known as “dati leumi” or “dati yashkeee” or “chashmonaiyeee!

    #2543871
    nevuah
    Participant

    User176
    They point fingers at everybody else and call everybody “pick and choose”
    When they pick and choose themselves.
    Ignore them. They have no brains

    #2544195
    user176
    Participant

    Somejew, don’t justify your absurdity. Dont compare not keeping Shabbat to believing that the establishment of the State of Israel was a gift from Hashem. You are the epitome of sinat hinam. Dont compare statements of ame haaretz who are brainwashed by their culture and surroundings to well grounded Torah based appreciation to Hashem for the kindness that is Medinat Yisrael. YOUR Torah is not THE Torah. In fact, your attitude towards other Jews is not Torah at all, it’s the antithesis of Torah, vile hatred for no good reason. I sincerely hope that everything you write here in an exaggeration. Let me be clear: I’m not telling you that anti Zionism is wrong. I’m telling you that saying that anti Zionism is a requirement to be considered a Torah Jew is blasphemous.

    #2544254
    user176
    Participant

    I learned an amazing gemera recently in masechet pesachim that discussed that some were noheg to light candles on erev Yom Kippur and some weren’t. The Gemara says that although they had opposite minhagim, the purpose of each Minhag was for the same ultimate intention. As the passuk says, “V’amech kulam tzadikim.”Ayen sham.

    I think this is an an excellent example of taking a step back to realize that there can be different ways of looking at things. Two groups can have the same goal and do opposite actions to arrive at that goal, and they’re both right.

    #2544262
    [email protected]
    Participant

    @user176

    would you agree that being “anti-yashke” is a “requirement to be considered a Torah Jew”?

    i’m not sure how you will answer, so please explain why yes or no (according to your religion). If you say “it’s nuanced”, please explain that nuance specifically.

    #2544580

    user> I’m telling you that saying that anti Zionism is a requirement to be considered a Torah Jew

    It is not just the intolerance itself that it is a problem, but underlying intellectual approach. In order to support this position, these people continue quoting several rabbonim they “chose” to follow (they simple selected rabonim who fit their views, of course) and disregard not just pro-zionist T’Ch (that could be forgiven as a partisan weakness), but even vast number of rabbonim who are not pro-Z but are reasonably tolerant at various levels. So, this is bizayon of majority of Torah in our, and previous, generation.

    #2544661
    simcha613
    Participant

    somejew- You keep trying to justify labeling Religious Zionists as kofrim by comparing them to Reform, Christianity, or other movements that deny fundamentals of Torah. But that comparison only works if you first show that Religious Zionism denies a fundamental of Torah.

    Reform ideology rejects the binding authority of Torah and halacha. Christianity treats Jesus as divine or quasi-divine and rejects core Jewish belief. Those are claims against ikarei emunah.

    But what is the equivalent kefirah in Religious Zionism?

    As far as I understand it, the objections to Religious Zionism usually fall into three categories.

    First, the Three Oaths and building a state before Mashiach. Fine, that is a real hashkafic dispute. Some hold the Three Oaths are binding halachically; others argue they are aggadic, not brought as practical halacha by major poskim, or that they were not violated because of international permission such as Balfour/the UN, or that the nations violated their oath through persecution and the Holocaust. Others might even say the founding was problematic but that this does not obligate dismantling the State today.

    You can disagree with those answers. You can think they are wrong. But since when does being wrong in a hashkafic machlokes make someone a kofer? Which ikkar of emunah is being denied?

    Second, the anti-religious ideology of many secular Zionists. Yes, many secular Zionists wanted Jewish nationalism to replace Torah. That ideology is anti-Torah. But Religious Zionism explicitly rejects that. Religious Zionists believe Eretz Yisrael, Jewish sovereignty, mitzvos hateluyos ba’aretz, the army, and national life must be connected to Torah and halacha — not replace them.

    So why should the kefirah of secular Zionists be projected onto Religious Zionists who reject that kefirah?

    Third, the practical argument that the State has harmed the Jewish people. That is also a legitimate debate. One can argue the State caused spiritual damage, empowered secularism, or endangered Jews. One can also argue it saved Jewish lives, enabled Torah growth, protected Jews, and allowed millions to live in Eretz Yisrael. But again: even if someone is wrong about the practical consequences of the State, why would that make him a kofer?

    So no, I do not believe “anything can be called Torah hashkafa.” Some beliefs are outside Torah. But you have not shown that Religious Zionism is one of them.

    If you want to claim Religious Zionists are not Torah Jews, don’t compare them to Reform or Christianity. Show the actual kefirah. What fundamental of Torah do they deny? Which ikkar of the Rambam? Which accepted definition of apikorsus?

    Otherwise, what you have is a serious machlokes in hashkafa — not a license to declare Torah-observant Jews to be outside Torah.

    #2544663
    simcha613
    Participant

    You keep trying to justify labeling Religious Zionists as kofrim by comparing them to Reform, Christianity, or other movements that deny fundamentals of Torah. But that comparison only works if you first show that Religious Zionism denies a fundamental of Torah.

    Reform ideology rejects the binding authority of Torah and halacha. Christianity treats Jesus as divine or quasi-divine and rejects core Jewish belief. Those are claims against ikarei emunah.

    But what is the equivalent kefirah in Religious Zionism?

    As far as I understand it, the objections to Religious Zionism usually fall into three categories.

    First, the Three Oaths and building a state before Mashiach. Fine, that is a real hashkafic dispute. Some hold the Three Oaths are binding halachically; others argue they are aggadic, not brought as practical halacha by major poskim, or that they were not violated because of international permission such as Balfour/the UN, or that the nations violated their oath through persecution and the Holocaust. Others might even say the founding was problematic but that this does not obligate dismantling the State today.

    You can disagree with those answers. You can think they are wrong. But since when does being wrong in a hashkafic machlokes make someone a kofer? Which ikkar of emunah is being denied?

    Second, the anti-religious ideology of many secular Zionists. Yes, many secular Zionists wanted Jewish nationalism to replace Torah. That ideology is anti-Torah. But Religious Zionism explicitly rejects that. Religious Zionists believe Eretz Yisrael, Jewish sovereignty, mitzvos hateluyos ba’aretz, the army, and national life must be connected to Torah and halacha — not replace them.

    So why should the kefirah of secular Zionists be projected onto Religious Zionists who reject that kefirah?

    Third, the practical argument that the State has harmed the Jewish people. That is also a legitimate debate. One can argue the State caused spiritual damage, empowered secularism, or endangered Jews. One can also argue it saved Jewish lives, enabled Torah growth, protected Jews, and allowed millions to live in Eretz Yisrael. But again: even if someone is wrong about the practical consequences of the State, why would that make him a kofer?

    So no, I do not believe “anything can be called Torah hashkafa.” Some beliefs are outside Torah. But you have not shown that Religious Zionism is one of them.

    If you want to claim Religious Zionists are not Torah Jews, don’t compare them to Reform or Christianity. Show the actual kefirah. What fundamental of Torah do they deny? Which ikkar of the Rambam? Which accepted definition of apikorsus?

    Otherwise, what you have is a serious machlokes in hashkafa — not a license to declare Torah-observant Jews to be outside Torah.

    #2544745
    user176
    Participant

    Somejew, I’m curious to know your definition of Zionist.

    #2544749
    user176
    Participant

    Somejew, I’m curious to know your definition of a Zionist.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 66 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.