Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Yom haatzmaut and sefira
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 5, 2026 9:51 pm at 9:51 pm #2545296[email protected]Participant
I’ll try to answer publicly bl”n when i can get to it. but, if you really want to have the conversation necessary for any serious torah answer, I’ve made my email available and would appreciate if you reach out to me directly. unfortunately, CR has two major systemic hurdles to real conversation: the inability to stay on topic within a open-group linear thread and the painfully slow manual comment editorial review process causing sometimes multi-day delays in a single response.
the invitation to my email is for anyone who identifies as a kosher jew.
May 5, 2026 9:51 pm at 9:51 pm #2545093qwerty613ParticipantTo user176 and simcha613
Logical arguments don’t work on brainwashed and braindead cult followers. When I arrived at YWN in 2023 Lubavichers were spouting their Rebbe garbage. One of them “proved” that the Rebbe was Moshiach, and a Novi by citing a Psak signed by over a 100 Chabad Rabbis who added that Schneersohn is still alive. You’re both good guys, what do you hope to accomplish? Those NK supporters are way past the 50th level of Tumah.
May 6, 2026 10:29 pm at 10:29 pm #2546149simcha613ParticipantSomeJew- My understanding is that since I am proudly Dati Leumi, I am not a kosher Jew in your opinion. So I will wait your response here.
May 7, 2026 3:50 pm at 3:50 pm #2546271[email protected]ParticipantI don’t care about opinions. There is a Torah that defines what is kosher.
Regardless, what I wrote was intentional: “anyone who identifies as a kosher jew”.
I am not sure what type of “dati leumi” you are, the one who knows he’s a kofer and the one who doesn’t.
The Torah is not a secret, it’s content is widely accessible and taught around the world.
@simcah613, you asked a reasonable question. If you meant it sincerely, I don’t believe I can do it justice within the confines of CR (as mentioned above) and you should please reach out to me directly.
May 7, 2026 3:51 pm at 3:51 pm #2546585user176ParticipantSomejew, please share your definition of a Zionist here.
May 8, 2026 5:06 pm at 5:06 pm #2546776AVcavParticipantshkoiach. beautifully written
May 8, 2026 5:06 pm at 5:06 pm #2546777AVcavParticipantThe problem isn’t creating a state of Israel. It’s creating an anti-religious state of Israel.
May 8, 2026 5:06 pm at 5:06 pm #2546778[email protected]ParticipantPreviously you asked me and ignored my answer to the question of what is “zionism”:
here https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/the-antizionism-amongst-religious-jews-has-no-legitimate-detractors/page/6#post-2529457To repeat the answer for readers hear about what is Zionism. one i’ve copied from another resource:
What is Zionism
Zionism is a secular anti-Judaism movement started in the 19th century to disconnect the Jewish community from religious Judaism and replace it with a secular new identity, called the “Hebrew” or ”Israeli”. Core to Zionism is the belief in ”self-determination” vs the Jewish belief in ”divine determination” where the success and safety of Jews is directly linked to our adherence to the Torah and keeping the mitzvos.
Practically, zionism today means the state of Israel has a right to exist, which is counter to the Torah which says that Jews do not have the right to have their own state (in any form) as there is a divine decree that we live as citizens amongst the non-Jewish nations.
tldr
Zionism means the State of Israel has a right to exist and that Jews have a right to self determination.
There are simpler, and even more to the point definitions, but they are only accessible if you have already accepted and learnt only Torah sources and rejected zionism.
Now to answer the current question of “what is a zionist?” it would be who believes that the State of Israel has a right to exist and that Jews have a right to self determination.
May 8, 2026 5:06 pm at 5:06 pm #2546842user176ParticipantSomejew, I’d love to learn more about the different types of dati leumi, in your view what makes one kosher and the other not
May 10, 2026 1:36 pm at 1:36 pm #2547003Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipant> a secular anti-Judaism movement started in the 19th century to disconnect the Jewish community from religious Judaism and replace it with a secular new identity, called the “Hebrew” or ”Israeli”.
putting aside weird views of the posters, this sounds like a genuinely held belief. Of course, it does not cover “dati leumi” except thru “guilt by association” but it also projects it’s own fears (of 100+ years ago) on the reality. Early Zs, especially Herzl were not in the position to disconnect Jews from Judaism, he lived in the already totally assimilated society in Vienna, not in Lita. He tried to disassociated Jews from their non-Jewish neighbors whom he found to be dangerous, using the tools he had.
The view above is like blaming a person who jumped into the water to save someone (to borrow on Chofetz Chaim’s metaphor about need to save so many Yidde) that he did not feed them and taught them Torah. He saved their lives so they can do the rest.
May 10, 2026 1:37 pm at 1:37 pm #2547155yechiellParticipantthere are times when one mitzvah supercedes another mitzvah. shabbos supercedes putting on tefillin.
yom haatzmaut, after the shoah, for sure supercedes sefira.
i don’t care what the rabbis say, they also told the jews in europe to stay put, instead of running for their lives …. sorry, and yes i am orthodoxMay 11, 2026 11:30 am at 11:30 am #2547413SQUARE_ROOTParticipantsimcha613 said:
“Yes, many secular Zionists wanted
Jewish nationalism to replace Torah.
That ideology is anti-Torah.But Religious Zionism explicitly rejects that.
Religious Zionists believe Eretz Yisrael,
Jewish sovereignty, mitzvos hateluyos ba’aretz,
the army, and national life must be
connected to Torah and halacha — NOT replace them.So why should the kefirah of secular Zionists
be projected onto Religious Zionists who reject that kefirah?”
__________________________________________
MY RESPONSE:Thank you very much for your correct logic.
I had similar thoughts for a long time,
but I did not know how to express them in words.May G*D reward you for speaking the truth.
Tragically, UJM & HaKatan DO NOT CARE
about your logic, no matter how true it is,
and no matter how correct it is.They care ONLY about what their favorite Rabbis said,
and they intentionally ignore everything else,
which they mistakenly believe to be a great act of righteousness.One day, the misguided piety (and stubbornness)
of UJM & HaKatan & those like them will cause
a Jewish Civil War, or another Holocaust, or both.Millions of Jewish lives will be lost.
Countless Jews will be taken hostage and tortured and raped.
Countless Jews will be captured and forced to convert to Islam.
Countless Jews will be stateless & homeless refugees.
Billions of dollars worth of Jewish property will be lost.
Countless synagogues & yeshivahs will be destroyed.That is the endgame of the policies endorsed by UJM & HaKatan.
May 11, 2026 11:30 am at 11:30 am #2547418user176ParticipantSomejew, according to your definition, someone who believes in “divine determination“ is not a Zionist. But yet you do have people today who believe in “divine determination” and call themselves Zionists. You have Jews who alarm Torah and do mitzvot and yet call themselves Zionists. Which obviously means they use a different definition of Zionist than you do.
I don’t see how you made that jump from what Zionism was to what Zionism is. I don’t see the connection between the two. So your problem really has nothing to do with early Zionism it has to do with supporting Israels right to exist because you believe it is against the Torah. The Torah does not state anywhere that it is assur to have a state in any form. Your argument holds no water in any way.
May 11, 2026 4:33 pm at 4:33 pm #2547732Always_Ask_QuestionsParticipantuser > your problem really has nothing to do with early Zionism it has to do with supporting Israels right to exist because you believe it is against the Torah
but his argument is not genuine – as you are saying, there was initial opposition to the anti-religious groups, and Zionists were “closest to home” comparing to communists and bundists, so that opposition created the arguments, and now several generation later these arguments are being taught to children who then post it here.
May 11, 2026 4:33 pm at 4:33 pm #2547735[email protected]ParticipantI sense you are asking me sincerely and not playing semantic games. There might be many who call themselves zionists when they are really (otherwise?) kosher jews, especially in haredi circles. I even heard charedim who claim to be the “real zionists because we keep Torah”. But, that is as absurd as claiming we Jews “are the real Notzrim because we’re going to really bring moshiach”, it’s absurd because it’s ignoring the definition of those who founded and continue to claim the title as their own. You can argue that there are differences across the many generation of evil zionists, you can explain the nuance between the secular zionists and the dati leumi, between the labor and the revisionists, just like you can argue about the changes between nazis in WWII and neo-nazi’s today.
But, words have meanings and labels are chosen for a meaning. “Zionism” means something and there is a reason there is a whole religious movement that calls itself “zionist” and makes itself distinct from other groups. I have, above, defined what I understand to be the common thread that defines the common fundamental ideology that specifically mean “zionism” as commonly used.
That common thread is the rejection of what they call “The Galut Jew”, the rejection of the Divine decree that we Jews remain second class citizens in non-Jewish nations, and the rejection of the Torah definition of “Am Yisroel” and replaced by one that includes michalilei shabbos and apikorsim and porikei ol torah and mitzvos.
This “common thread” is exactly the rejection of the Torah prescribe solution to exile which is specifically and exclusively tshiva and instead replaced with a military and guns and wars that demand “Jewish” domination over our own country and our own land.
May 12, 2026 1:05 pm at 1:05 pm #2547969simcha613Participantsomejew-
I understand that you believe Religious Zionism is deeply wrong about galus, geulah, hishtadlus, the Medina, and cooperation with secular Jews. But that still does not answer the question.
Why does any of that rise to the level of kefirah?
A person can be wrong about the Three Oaths, wrong about the proper response to galus, wrong about political sovereignty, wrong about military hishtadlus, and wrong about how to relate to non-religious Jews — and still not be a kofer.
Kefirah means denial of a fundamental of Torah, not merely taking the wrong side in a serious hashkafic machlokes.
So what exactly is being denied? Hashem? Torah min haShamayim? The obligation of mitzvos? Mashiach? Divine providence? Schar v’onesh?
You are making an argument that Religious Zionism is wrong, harmful, or forbidden. Fine — that is a debate. But you still have not shown that it is kefirah, or that Torah-observant Religious Zionists are outside Klal Yisrael.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.