Archive for May, 2012

Vertluch: Parshas Bamidbar

Friday, May 25th, 2012

The pasuk (4:16) says, ‘the responsibility of Elazar Hakohen was the oil for the Menorah, the incense, the daily Mincha and the anointment oil; the task of the entire Mishkan and everything in it- of the Mishkan and its utensils.’

The Ramban explains that this pasuk is dictating the various duties that Elazar was to carry out. The Ramban then continues and details the specifics of the tasks, and describes just how enormous of an undertaking it was. The ketores included three hundred and sixty five portions and the oil was the full amount of oil needed to light the Menorah, for a complete year. One must ask-how was it even remotely possible for a human to carry such a load of responsibilities? It is true, Ramban explains, that Elazar was just as strong as Yaakov Avinu (and he quotes the pasuk of ‘V’koyvei Hashem yachalifu koach’-those who seek Hashem, HE rejuvenates their strength), but what does that mean?

Clearly there lies a fundamental yesod here: The measure of a person’s abilities is not based on his physical limitations but rather according to his koach haratzoyn and his ruach hachaim, his desire to do something. Despite the fact that a person’s natural ability doesn’t hold the strength to carry such a load, if he has the true desire to do whatever he can for his avodas Hashem, Hashem will give him that supernatural power.

As we know, by kabalas HaTorah Hashem spoke with klal Yisroel ‘face to face’. Asks the Alshich, how was it possible that six hundred thousand people were able to be on such a high level of nevuah, at a time when they weren’t befitting of it?

Alshich answers that when Hashem originally created man He intended that each person would be on the lofty level of ‘panim el panim’. This way, Hashem could show each person the proper direction every step of the way. However, after Adam ate from the eitz hadaas, Hashem instilled within us an ‘inner yetzer hara’. This yetzer hara became a barrier, weakening the relationship between us and Hashem. However, the gemara in avoda zara says that when klal Yisroel was at Har Sinai this ‘barrier’ was removed and we returned to our original state of creation. Now, temporarily restored to level of man prior to Adams sin, we were naturally, without any nevuah, able to correspond with Hashem on the level of panim el panim.

However, Ohr HaChaim Hakadosh disagrees with the Alshich and says that this ‘barrier’ was lifted only after Hashem began speaking with klal Yisroel, as a result of them hearing His holy words! If this is so, we are back to our original question. How did klal Yisroel ascend to the level of nevuah necessary to hear the words of Hashem in the first place?!

Rav Chaim Kamil, zt”l offers an answer based upon what we mentioned earlier. It is true, that on their own klal Yisroel was absolutely incapable of reaching the proper level of nevuah at that point. However, they displayed such an incredible desire to be on that level, that Hashem elevated them to the level they so desperately wanted to reach. For Hashem never expects a person to exceed the boundaries of his limitations. All He asks is that we express the desire to do so. Klal Yisoel desired to see Hashem so much that they were actually elevated to that level of nevuah.

Where do we see this from?

We know that as klal Yisroel stood under Har Sinai they cried out naaseh before nishma. Rashi in parshas Yisro says that Moshe said to Hashem ‘klal yisroel wants to hear the dvar Hashem, not from a shaliach but from you yourself.’ Rashi continues and says that bnei Yisroel had a complaint. They said ‘we want to see our king.’ This was a plea demonstrating their will to be on that lofty madregah that they knew was necessary for them to ‘see’ Hashem. It was through this desire and yearning for Hashem that they were elevated to the level of panim el panim. That although naturally they weren’t worthy, and even though what they pleaded for was seemingly unattainable, through their strong and desperate desire the impossible became history.

This was pshat in Elazar. His desire to serve Hashem with all his abilities gave him the supernatural strength to carry a huge load he would have otherwise not been able to handle. It was due to his שאיפות, his desire, which enabled him to do so.

The powerful lesson we can learn from here seems obvious. With Shavous just a day away, may we all be zoche to awaken our desires to shteig in learning and d’veikus with Hashem-and to iy”h enter the anniversary between us and Hashem on such a high that we will be lifted from our bodys into a מדרגת גבוה of true דביקות ואהבת ה’.

HAVE A GREAT SHABBOS

Swastikas Sprayed On Ancient Shul Near Yericho

Friday, May 25th, 2012

Swastikas, Palestinian flags and “Palestine is ours” slogans were spray-painted on the ancient Shul in Naaran near Yericho overnight.

Public Diplomacy Minister Yuli Edelstein condemned the act and remarked it was no wonder the Palestinians desecrate an ancient synagogue “after destroying and desecrating Temple Mount remnants.”

The Minister added, “The incident reaffirms the belief that Jewish holy sites must be under Israel’s sovereignty.”

The ancient Shul in Naaran was built in the Sixth Century and attracts both worshippers and pilgrims. The compound contains an ancient mosaic and archeological treasures.

On Friday, a group of worshippers was shocked to find that the site had been vandalized. “I was shocked to see the destruction,” said Dr. Yoel Elitzur who led the group. “It turns out that general values of respect for antiques mean nothing to these savages. The site must be placed under Jewish control as soon as possible.”

(Source: Ynet)

Power Outage In Far Rockaway Briefly Effects Yeshiva Darchei Torah [UPDATED 9:00AM]

Friday, May 25th, 2012

[UPDATED IN EXTENDD ARTICLE]

8:00AM Far Rockaway – Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) is reporting a power outage in the Far Rockaway section of Queens. LIPA is reporting approximately 1300 customers out at this time. The census population for the area is approximately 8,793 customers. The affected area is: Cornaga Avenue to Seagirt Boulevard. Beach 20th Street to Beach 9th Street. The affected facilities are as follows:

- St. John’s Episcopal Hospital -718 Beach 20th St, Far Rockaway NY – The Facilities Manager at the hospital advised that there was a partial outage in the hospital; however, they are now fully restored.

- Brookhaven Beach HRF Senior Nursing Facility – 250 Beach 17th St, Far Rockaway, NY – Unable to make contact with the facility via landline.

- Yeshiva Darchei Torah – 257 Beach 17th St, Far Rockaway, NY – The Administrator on duty advised that the facility is currently without power.

UPDATE 9:00AM: As The power has been restored to Yeshiva Darchei Torah. Other areas are still without power.

YWN will update this story as soon as additional info becomes available to us.

(Eli Gefen – YWN)

FCC Seeks Emergency Response Upgrade

Friday, May 25th, 2012

The FCC launched a proceeding Thursday to explore whether communications can be restored after natural disasters or emergencies by putting specially equipped drones or other aircraft in the air.

While the commission action sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie, Deployable Aerial Communications Architecture in Emergency Communications has the ability to temporarily restore critical communications — including emergency response and 911 calling — when land-based services are knocked out.

“Like science fiction, it is technologically complex,” FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said, before the panel’s unanimous vote. “But it’s not that hard to understand, if you imagine a cell tower that is floating or flying in the sky.

When Hurricane Katrina hit, it knocked out dozens of 911 call centers, and millions of people lost their telephone service. DACA-enabled aircraft could fill in the gap until land-based communications are restored.

Before the new service can take off, however, the commission needs to figure out whether there will be interference problems between a DACA-enabled aircraft and ground communications, how to activate the technology and who will be in charge of it.

The FCC isn’t going to launch its own air force, but some commissioners believe that using technology like the military uses on the battlefield can have peaceful applications.

But it isn’t just the military that is using the technology, as it also is being used by oil companies to monitor industrial processes in remote areas, said Jerry Knoblach, chairman and CEO of Space Data, an Arizona company that provides wireless services and solutions for businesses and government.

READ MORE: POLITICO

Romney, Gingrich, Trump Will Appear Together At Las Vegas Fundraiser

Friday, May 25th, 2012

Newt Gingrich, Donald Trump and Mitt Romney will make an appearance together later this month in Las Vegas.

The three men will appear together at a fundraiser for Romney’s presidential bid at Trump Towers on May 29, NBC News reported on Thursday.

In February, Romney received Trump’s endorsement during a press conference at the casino. The former Massachusetts governor went on to a commanding win in the state’s caucuses, which Trump took partial credit for. Gingrich endorsed Romney shortly after he ended his own presidential bid.

Romney’s campaign is also fundraising off a chance to dine with Trump, along with Romney, in New York City. Any supporter who makes a donation will be entered in a raffle to win a trip and dinner with the two men.

The invite reads “I want you. Dine with The Donald and Mitt.”

The winner receives: “Airport transportation in the Trump vehicle. Stay at the Trump International Hotel & Tower New York. Tour The Celebrity Apprentice Boardroom. Dine with Donald Trump and Mitt Romney.”

(Source: The Hill)

Josh Mandel, Shomer Shabbos Senate Candidate, Returns Donations That Are Target Of FBI Investigation

Friday, May 25th, 2012

Ohio treasurer and U.S. Senate candidate Josh Mandel has returned $105,000 in campaign donations that are under federal investigation.

Mandel’s campaign sent a letter this week to the Suarez Corporation Industries near Canton saying the money was returned to 21 employees of the direct-marketing firm. The letter says the money was returned out of an abundance of caution and called it an appropriate move until the investigation is complete.

FBI investigators have questioned Suarez Corp. employees about combined donations totaling $100,000 each to Mandel and freshman U.S. Rep. James Renacci.

Suarez Corp. president Benjamin Suarez tells The Canton Repository the firm gave investigators financial records and W-2 statements that would prove the employees could afford to make the political contributions.

He says the investigation has disrupted company operations.

(Source: ABC News)

Timeline of Etan Patz Case from 1979 to 2012

Friday, May 25th, 2012

May 25, 1979: Etan Patz, 6, leaves his SoHo building for his first-even walk alone to the school bus stop. He disappears after walking out the door, and the search goes on for months.

1990: U.S. Attorney Stuart R. GraBois announces he believes a man charged in a 1985 Pennsylvania child-molestation case, Jose Ramos, is a suspect in Patz’s disappearance.

1998: GraBois says he believes Patz is dead and that Ramos is the suspect.

2000: Detectives search a Lower East Side basement where Ramos had lived, hoping for evidence in the case.

2001: A judge declares Patz legally dead so that the family can pursue a wrongful death suit against Ramos.

2004: State Supreme Court Justice Barbara R. Kapnick declares Ramos responsible for Patz’s murder. The family is awarded $2 million, which they never collected.

2009: Cyrus Vance Jr., campaigning for Manhattan district attorney, promises to reopen the case if elected.

2010: Vance announces he has reopened the case.

April 19, 2012: The FBI and NYPD resume the search for Patz with a plan to dig up the floor of a basement near where Patz disappeared. The basement is connected to a handyman who police said had contact with the boy, and had a new concrete floor after he went missing.

April 23, 2012: Authorities conclude their search of the basement, with no obvious evidence gathered. Some items were sent to an FBI lab for further analysis.

May 24, 2012: Police announce the arrest of former bodega stock clerk Pedro Hernandez after receiving a tip that they say was generated because of the previous month’s attention to the cold case. Police said Hernandez confessed to luring Patz into the store where he worked and then taking him to the basement, where he strangled him.

(Source: NBC New York)

Monticello Wal-Mart Cited By State For ‘Critical Deficiencies’

Friday, May 25th, 2012

A state Department of Agriculture and Markets inspection of the Wal-Mart store on Anawana Lake Road in the Town of Thompson has resulted in the store being cited for “critical deficiencies” including the discovery of mouse droppings.

This is the fourth time in less than a year that the store has been inspected and each time, it failed, with among other concerns fresh mouse droppings.

Ag and Markets inspectors had a meeting scheduled for this past Tuesday to discuss the previous three inspections and while there, the rodent droppings were observed, resulting in the fourth inspection and failure.

That, said Ag and Markets spokesman Jessica Ziehm automatically kicks in a hearing process. The hearing officer has the authority to revoke the food processing permit in the store, which would include the areas dealing with produce, deli, and bakery. Ziehm believes at this particular store, meats are all prepackaged and would not be affected.

Among the specific critical deficiencies cited in the most recent inspection were romaine lettuce not being washed before being used as a garnish on ready to eat food; fresh appearance of mouse droppings on shelves near checkouts including a gnawed health bar; gnawed blueberries; mouse droppings near Kosher items; fresh mouse droppings between soup and canned pasta; and fresh mouse droppings present in packages in certain aisles.

Ziehm said those critical deficiencies are highly uncommon during inspections of most store.

General deficiencies found in the store included boxes of frozen foods stored on the floor of a walk-in freezer hampering proper inspection and cleaning; the floor around a drain in the meat room had standing liquid; fan guards over beer in the dairy walk-in cooler had an accumulation of dusty residue; a honey comb vent of retail cheese and process meat display exhibited discoloration. Other concerns included dead flies in a fly catcher located between a fryer and slicer table and a hot holding unit was not properly maintained with the sliding door missing from the unit.

(Source: MidHudsonNews)

Rise In Kids Being Poisoned By Laundry Detergent

Friday, May 25th, 2012

Miniature laundry detergent packets arrived on store shelves in recent months as an alternative to bulky bottles and messy spills. But doctors across the country say children are confusing the tiny, brightly colored packets with candy and swallowing them.

Nearly 250 cases have been reported this year to poison control centers. Though they remain a tiny fraction of the thousands of poisoning calls received every year, doctors are concerned. The symptoms they see in connection with ingesting the packets – such as nausea and breathing problems – are more severe than typical detergent poisoning. No deaths have been reported.

“We’re not quite sure why it’s happening,” said Dr. Kurt Kleinschmidt, a Dallas toxicologist and professor at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. “But we’ve clearly had some kids who have become much more ill. We look at these pods as being clearly more dangerous than the standard detergent.”

Tide, Purex and other detergent manufacturers introduced different versions of the packets earlier this year. The lightweight, colorfully swirled plastic packets contain a single-use amount of detergent that dissolves in water. They’re intended to be dropped into a laundry machine in place of liquid or powder detergent.

Several poison control centers started to get calls from parents about the packets in March and April, soon after they were introduced in earnest. Texas reported 71 instances of exposure this year, all but one in March or later. Missouri reported 25 cases related to the packets, and Illinois reported 26.
“If you look at the Tide Pods, they’re bright blue and bright red and they look very similar to some of the ribbon candy,” said Julie Weber, director of the Missouri Poison Control Center in St. Louis.

Paul Fox, a spokesman for Cincinnati-based Procter & Gamble, the parent company of Tide, says all cleaning products need to be handled carefully. He said Tide was working with poison control centers and advocacy groups to make sure parents know more about the risks.

“The packs themselves are safe, regardless of who manufactures them, provided that they are used for their intended purpose,” Fox said. “The risk becomes when they’re left like any other household product within reach of small, inquisitive hands.”

While the detergent packets are a threat, poison control centers receive far more reports about other substances annually. In 2010, they fielded thousands of calls about potential poisoning to children under 5 from ibuprofen, diaper rash cream and other household substances.
However, doctors are alarmed about the packets because they appear to be more dangerous than just swallowing liquid or powder detergent.

(Source: Huffington Post)

Hilchos Uminhagei Shavuos

Friday, May 25th, 2012

Rabbi Yissachar Dov Krakowski is Rov of Kehilas Torah Ve’Chesed in Yerushalayim’s Nachlaot Neighborhood. Rabbi Krakowski also serves as a Rabbinical representative for OU Kashrus in Israel. Rabbi Krakowski has been mishamesh many Rabbanim and Poskim both In America and in Eretz-Yisroel. Rabbi Krakowski started his Yeshiva years in Beis Hamedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore. He Then continued in Yeshivas Shaar HaTorah Grodna (Queens NY), South Fallsburg, Brisk (Yerushalayim), and currently still learns in Kollel Nachlos Elazar (Yerushalayim). Rabbi Krakowski can be reached at: rabbikrakowski@gmail.com.

The following is meant as a convenient review of Halachos pertaining to Shavuos. The Piskei Din for the most part are based purely on the Sugyos, Shulchan Aruch and Ramah, and the Mishna Berura, unless stated otherwise. They are based on my understanding of the aforementioned texts through the teachings of my Rebeim. As individual circumstances are often important in determining the psak in specific cases, and as there may be different approaches to some of the issues, one should always check with one’s Rov first.

Shavuos Night:

1.       On Shavuos Night one should wait for nightfall to daven Maariv.

a.       The reason for this is to ensure that the 50 days of Sfiras Haomer are complete.

i.  There are those who are makpid to wait until nightfall according to Rabeinu Tam (72 minutes after sunset) etc. Many only wait until calendar (number of minutes after sunset may vary depending on location) nightfall even if they are makpid on Rabeinu Tam for Motzei Shabbos.

2.       Kiddush Lel-Shavuos is the regular Yom-Tov Kiddush, including Shehechiyanu (in Chutz LaAretz both days).

3.       The Seuda Lel-Shavuos is a regular Yom-Tov Seuda.

a.       As it is more important to eat meat Shavuos day there are those that are Noheg to eat their “dairy Seuda” Lel Shavuos.

i.  Most eat a regular Yom-Tov meat meal.

4.       There is a minhag to stay up LEARNING Lel-Shavuos until sunrise, and to Daven with sunrise (the Ben Ish Chai and other Seforim explain based on Ari Z’L that the main point of staying up is to daven Netz. The Ben Ish Chai maintains that Musaf shouldalso be davened before going to sleep).

i.  There are those who go to sleep and wake up before Sunrise in order to learn a little, and at least to daven with the Sunrise.

1.       The Minhag of staying Lel-Shavuos is based on the idea that we are trying to make up for the fact that Klal-Yisroel slept on the day of Kabbolas HaTorah. If this is the case, Davening Neitz (with Sunrise) would also be a way to compensate for that earlier failure.

ii.                         There is a minhag amongst some of the Chasidim to stay up all night learning, but to go to sleep at dawn. Then they daven Shacharis at a regular time.

1.       This minhag is also attempting to fix the same mishap of Klal-Yisroel sleeping late, but there is a fear that if one davens Shacharis after an all nighter one will be sleepy and not daven properly.

a.       There are varying Minhagim as to what a person should learn on Lel-Shavuos:

i.  One of these consists of the traditional Tikun Lel Shavuos. The Tikun is made up of beginnings and ends of the Sifrei Tanach and parts of Torah She Baal Peh. It’s supposed to serve as an “abridged version” of the “entire Torah”.

ii.                         Another approach is the more Yeshiva oriented style of having a Seder in Gemarah Lel-Shavuos. The argument is made that however traditional the Tikun is, it still isn’t “real” learning as a person isn’t necessarily working towards understanding material, and a person is unlikely to retain much from it.

iii.                      Yet another option is Shiurim and ‘learn what you want’ style learning. Due to the late hours and the lack of sleep some people prefer to listen to a good speaker, or to read Torah that they find particularly interesting.

1.       If one follows the minhag of doing the Tikun, one should not deviate from it unless one feels that Shavuos will be more meaningful and fulfilling by switching to some other learning formula. When one doesn’t have a particular minhag, one should choose the learning approach that is the most productive for that particular individual.

Birchos Hashachar after staying up all night:

1)      Tzitzis: There is some disagreement as to whether someone wearing daytime clothing at night is obligated in Tzitzis or not. Therefore we wear our tzitzis throughout the night if we are staying up all night (in daytime garb). Since we don’t take off our tzitzis, and as we may have had the obligation of wearing tzitzis the whole time we don’t make a Brocho on tzitzis in the morning.  Consequently, one should have in mind when making the Brocho on the Tallis to be motzi the tzitzis as well.

a)      Someone who doesn’t wear a Tallis should ask someone who does to say the Brocho on Tallis out loud and to be motzi them as well (for their tzitzis/taalis katan).

2)      Birchas HaTorah: many Poskim maintain that someone who stays up the whole night learning (unless they slept a half hour) should not say Birchas HaTorah.

a)      It is best to hear Birchas HaTorah from someone who did sleep

i)        When one is being Yotzei birchas HaTorah from someone else, that person should say/learn (or at least listen to someone learning) something (psukim and Torah SheBaal Peh) right after hearing the brochos.

b)      If someone doesn’t have the opportunity to hear Birchas HaTorah from someone who slept he should have in mind by birchas Ahava Raba/Ahavas Olam (of Shacharis) to be Yotzei with that blessing his obligation of Birchas HaTorah.

i)        As soon as he finishes Shacharis he should say/learn some psukim and some Torah SheBaal Peh.

(1)   It is also advisable to try to have one of the olim L’Torah to have in mind to be motzi you in their Birchas HaTorah on the Torah reading (you should then be Yotzei your psukim with the laining, and between the Aliyos you should learn some Torah SheBaal Peh).

3)      Al Netilas Yadayim and Asher Yotzar: Whether someone who stayed up the whole night should make these brachos it is a matter of debate. In such a situation, it is therefore preferable for one to first use the facilities and then wash one’s hands and make these brachos.

4)      The rest of Birchos Hashachar: it seems to be the consensus of the Poskim that Birchas Elokai Neshama and Hamaavir should not be recited by someone who didn’t sleep. Therefore these brachos should ideally be heard from someone who slept,and otherwise they should be omitted (if someone didn’t hear Hamaavir from someone who hadn’t slept it could be that they may make the Brocho after napping during morning hours – one should ask one’s own Rov).

a)      The rest of Birchos Hashachar can be recited even if a person didn’t sleep at all.

i)        As there are minority opinions that even many of the other birchas Hashachar should not be recited by someone who didn’t sleep the minhag in many places has become to be Yotzei even the rest of the brachos from someone who slept.

(1)   There are many opinions that it is still best to say the rest of the Brachos oneself.

(a)   Either way – Yesh Al Mi Lismoch.

Seudas Shavuos:

1)      There is a minhag to eat dairy on Shavuos day.

a)      Some are Noheg to wash, to have dairy, then to drink something Parve and eat a Parve solid, and then eat meat all in the same meal.

i)        The Zohar mainatains that even in this fashion one should not eat dairy followed by meat in the same meal or even meat in close time proximity to dairy.

(1)   Some of the Chasidish Seforim maintain that even the Zohar would allow one to eat dairy followed by meat in the same meal on Shavuos (after eating something solid and drinking inbetween).

b)      There are those that have dairy meals Lel-Shavuos and not Shavuos day.

c)      There are those who have two separate Seudos on Shavuos day – Dairy and meat.

d)     There are those who have a dairy Kiddush, and then have a meat meal.

* The main factor to keep in mind is that in however one arranges for eating dairy, one should have a meat meal at some point during Shavuos day.

* People must also be careful (especially when having dairy and meat in the same meal) to keep full and complete separation between the two.

* It is important to keep in mind that after eating hard cheese it is not sufficient to merely rinse out one’s mouth and to eat a Parve item, but one must actually wait (in a similar fashion as between meat and dairy) before being able to consume meat.

* Just as on any other Yom-Tov, one should drink at least a little bit of wine.

This was prepared Líloy nishmas R’ Dovid Ben R’ Menachem Z”L Niftar 3 Sivan 5743 ת.נ.צ.ב.ה.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Buffett Says Free News Unsustainable, May Add More Papers

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway Inc. struck a deal this month to acquire 63 newspapers, said he may buy more publications as the industry rethinks whether to offer free content on the Internet.

“This is an unsustainable model and certain of our papers are already making progress in moving to something that makes more sense,” Buffett wrote in a letter to editors and publishers of Berkshire’s daily newspapers. “We want your best thinking as we work out the blend of digital and print that will attract both the audience and the revenue we need.”

Buffett is adding to Berkshire’s newspaper holdings with the $142 million deal announced May 17 for Media General Inc. publications including the Richmond Times-Dispatch of Virginia. The billionaire, who bought the Buffalo News in 1977 and said in 2009 that newspapers have the potential for unending losses, is now betting that papers with a community focus can profit as they change their models.

While circulation may slip, papers only fail when there are dailies competing in the same town, a publication forfeits its position as the primary source of locally important information or the market doesn’t have a sense of identity, he said.

“We don’t face those problems,” Buffett, 81, wrote in the letter dated yesterday and posted on the website of Berkshire’s Omaha World-Herald, which is in the Nebraska town where Buffett’s company is based. “Berkshire will probably purchase more papers in the next few years. We will favor towns and cities with a strong sense of community.”

Berkshire is the largest shareholder of Washington Post Co. (WPO) and purchased the World-Herald last year.

Buffett said the company’s newspapers won’t “move the needle in terms of Berkshire’s economic value” in yesterday’s letter.
In the Media General deal, Berkshire also gave the Richmond-based company a $400 million term loan with an interest rate of 10.5 percent and received warrants for about 4.6 million Class A shares. Media General retained its television stations and said it’s selling the Tampa, Florida, group separately.

Media General has declined more than 90 percent since the end of 2003. The company fell 3.8 percent to $3.51 at 4:04 p.m. in New York. Berkshire slipped 0.2 percent.

The newspaper industry, suffering drops in print advertising, has recently embraced digital subscription plans.

The New York Times Media Group began charging readers to access its news stories online last year, attracting about 454,000 paying subscribers as of March. The so-called paywall is estimated to bring in $125 million next year for Times Co., according to Douglas Arthur, an analyst at Evercore Partners Inc. Newspaper Paywalls
Gannett Co., owner of 82 daily newspapers, said this year it would begin charging readers to access news content online, except for flagship USA Today.

Press+, a startup that sells online subscription technology, is used by more than 300 publications, including some owned by MediaNews Group Inc., Tribune Co., GateHouse Media Inc., McClatchy Co. and Lee Enterprises Inc. Press+, based in New York, was founded by former Wall Street Journal publisher L. Gordon Crovitz, along with Steven Brill and Leo Hindery in 2010.

The World-Herald and 17 of the Media General papers Berkshire is buying also use Press+, Crovitz said in an e-mail.
Buffett, a supporter of President Barack Obama and an advocate of higher taxes on the wealthy, said the newspapers would remain independent in their coverage of public policy.

(Source: Bloomberg)

U.S. Probes Pics of Alleged 9/11 Plotter

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

U.S. military officials are looking into whether photos of the alleged 9-11 mastermind that have appeared on a jihadist website were smuggled out of Guantanamo Bay. NBC News terrorist analyst, Evan Kohlmann, said the images, which show the inmate smiling, appear to have been taken in the detention center.

Under Guantanamo regulations, unauthorized photos are not permitted to be taken or shared. Investigators are working to determine whether the images had been photo-shopped or in fact were taken at Guantanamo. Mohammed faces the death penalty if he is found guilty of orchestrating the Sept. 11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

READ MORE: MSNBC

When HKBH’s Outstretched Hand is Clear as Daylight

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

A senior IDF officer announced today, that in the past months, there have been no less than 20 attempts to abduct Israelis by terrorists. Terror organizations are working hard to take Israelis into custody, hoping to use their hostages as negotiating pawns to obtain the release of terrorists imprisoned in Israel. Intelligence community officials add that since the Gilad Shalit prisoner release, terror organizations have stepped-up efforts.

B’chasdei Hashem no less than 20 such attempts were foiled by security agencies since January 1, 2012. The officer is quoted anonymously by Israel Radio, explaining the IDF is compelled to be increasingly vigilant and implement appropriate measures to prevent another abduction of a soldier chas v’sholom.

In recent days, the ISA (Israel Security Agency – Shin Bet) and other agencies have announced the arrest of a number of terrorists working with different cells in Yehuda and Shomron, all trying to kidnap Israelis.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

Satmar Rebbe From Kiryas Yoel Shlita Addresses Efforts to Induct Chareidim into the IDF

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

“A terrible decree hovers over the chareidim” is how the Satmar Rebbe Rabbi Aaron Teitlebaum Shlita addressed the ongoing efforts to create a new Tal Law in Eretz Yisrael.

The remarks were made at the annual fundraising event for mosdos Satmar held in Williamsburg.

The rebbe said “The time will come when the Zionist ministers will desire it and then our children will not be permitted to learn in talmid torah. There is a minister of health who in a flash can order an autopsy on all the dead. There is a defense minister who in a moment can induct all the bochrim in yeshivos”.

The rebbe went on to explain the Tal Law and today’s reality, the Plesner Committee, the ongoing effort to introduce a new bill that will replace the former Tal Law. “Today there is a new committee. I don’t recall the name. A new king has taken over with his decrees.” He stressed the committee’s first task is to address drafting those who study torah. The committee feels that 500 men annually is not sufficient and now we require 1,000 and soon, all the yeshiva bochrim will be enlisted. “There are 60,000 chareidi Jews studying torah blei ayin hora. They want them all!”

The rebbe explained the gezeira impacts all those studying torah, litvish, chassidish, Ashkenazim and Sephardim, reiterating the harshness of the gezeira that hovers over Eretz Yisrael.

“The destruction of religion and uprooting of torah is dependent on the elected officials, the apikorsim and atheists who don’t have the slightest connection to yiddishkheit. They decide. There has not been such a heavy difficult gezeira facing Am Yisrael for many years” the rebbe added.

The rebbe questioned if those present understood the reality of what is taking place, to “compel them to serve in a tamei army. A treif army. Avi avos ha’tuma, lewd and full of filth like the worst of nations”.

“We must be mispallel to HKBH for our brethren. HKBH has watched out for us during the entire galus and may He have compassion on Am Yisrael”.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

BREAKING: Suspect Arrested in 1979 Killing of Etan Patz, Jewish Child In NYC

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

A New Jersey man has been arrested for allegedly luring 6-year-old Etan Patz off a SoHo street and strangling him in a development that police say solves a case that has mystified New York City for decades.

Patz vanished on his way to a school bus stop 33 years ago Friday. The case drew international attention and changed the way parents felt about letting their young children go off alone.

Police announced Thursday that Pedro Hernandez, who worked and lived in Patz’s neighborhood, had told them he lured Patz into a bodega near the boy’s house and attacked the child, choking him to death in the basement.

Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said police focused on Hernandez after receiving a tip from a relative who remembered Hernandez speaking of having killed a child. Another relative and a religious mentor also recalled those claims, the source said.

Based on those interviews, police went to question Hernandez.

Mayor Bloomberg said Thursday that the disappearance of Patz “broke the hearts of millions” across the nation, especially parents, and expressed sympathy again for the boy’s family.

“I certainly hope that we are one step closer to bringing them some measure of relief,” he said.

The search for Patz has been one of the largest, longest lasting and most heart wrenching hunts for a missing child in the country’s recent history.

Patz vanished on May 25, 1979 in the SoHo neighborhood of Manhattan while walking alone to a school bus stop.

Patz became the first missing child whose face appeared on the side of a milk carton.

READ MORE: NBC NEW YORK

Left-Wingers Call to Investigate MKs Who Wish to Oust Illegals

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Yariv Oppenheim of Peace Now is calling on the attorney general to launch an investigation against MKs Miri Regev, Danny Danon, Yariv Levin (Likud) and Dr. Michael Ben-Ari (Ichud HaLeumi) for attending a demonstration calling to deport illegal Africans from Israel. Oppenheim and his supporters feel the elected officials simply incited against the illegals and “fanned the flames of hatred” with their comments, referring to them as “a cancer in our country”.

12 people were arrested during the protest during which speakers spoke of the demographic threat posed by the 60,000 illegals from African countries. Some of the participants in the protest became violent and began throwing rocks at illegals in the area, prompting the arrests. Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu warned if the nation does not act, the “60,000 can easily become 600,000”.

The MKs were undeterred however, explaining that Israel must first take care of her own and then we can begin worrying about others.

Oppenheim is urging Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein to act “before it is too late”.

900 people have signed a petition calling on Weinstein to file charges against the MKs.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

Senators Vote to Punish Pakistan for Jailing Doc Tied to Bin Laden Raid

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

A Senate committee outraged over Pakistan imprisoning a doctor who led the U.S. to Usama bin Laden engaged Thursday in some dollar diplomacy by voting to cut aid to the country by $33 million.

The amount equals $1 million for every year of Dr. Shakil Afridi’s 33-year-long sentence for high treason.

The doctor ran a vaccination program for the CIA to collect DNA and verify bin Laden’s presence at the compound in Abbottabad where U.S. commandos found and killed the Al Qaeda leader in May 2011.

“All of us are outraged at the imprisonment and sentence of some 33 years, virtually a death sentence to the doctor,” said Arizona Sen. John McCain, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee. “It frankly outraged all of us.”

The punitive move came on top of deep reductions the Appropriations Committee already had made to President Obama’s budget request for Pakistan, a reflection of the growing congressional anger over its cooperation in combating terrorism. The overall foreign aid budget for next year had slashed more than half of the proposed assistance and threatened further reductions if Islamabad failed to open overland supply routes to U.S.-led NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Pushing aside any diplomatic talk, Republicans and Democrats criticized Pakistan a day after the conviction in Pakistan of Dr. Afridi.

The United States has called for Afridi’s release, arguing that he was acting in the interest of the U.S. and Pakistan.

“We need Pakistan, Pakistan needs us, but we don’t need Pakistan double-dealing and not seeing the justice in bringing Usama bin Laden to an end,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who pushed for the additional cut in aid.

He called Pakistan “a schizophrenic ally,” helping the United States at one turn, but then aiding the Haqqani network which has claimed responsibility for several attacks on Americans. The group also has ties to al-Aida and the Taliban.

READ MORE: FOX NEWS

HaRav Zev Leff: Parshas Bamidbar

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Emulating the Desert

“And Hashem spoke to Moshe in the Sinai desert”: Anyone who does not make himself ownerless like the desert cannot acquire wisdom or Torah, and therefore it says, “… in the Sinai desert” (Bamidbar Rabbah 1:7).

A hefker object is one of such little value to its owner that he formally abandons it and makes it available to all. Let us consider what is meant by making oneself hefker.
One must be prepared to forsake, if necessary, all worldly pleasures for the sake of Torah (see commentary of the Maharzav to the Midrash). “Torah can only be preserved in one who kills himself for it” (Sotah 21a). As the Mishnah says in Pirkei Avos (6:4):

This is the way of Torah: Eat bread with salt, drink water in small measure, sleep on the ground, and live a life of deprivation – but toil in the Torah! If you do this, “You are praiseworthy and all is well with you.” You are “praiseworthy” in this world, “and all is well with you” – in the World to Come.

Material deprivation may not be a necessary condition for learning Torah, but only one who is prepared to forego every pleasure and comfort for his Torah learning will ever achieve a deep understanding of Torah.

The true student of Torah must be as obsessed with Torah, as the lover with his beloved (see commentary of Rashash to the above Midrash; Rambam, Hilchos Teshuvah 10:6). Just as the lover’s thoughts are always of the beloved, so, too, one who truly wishes to plumb the depths of Torah cannot make his learning contingent on time, place or circumstance. Only when one feels that the Torah alone gives meaning to his life, will he be able to forego all other comforts and pleasures for its sake.

After relating that Bnei Yisrael came to Sinai, the Torah repeats itself and says that they left Refidim and came to Sinai. From this repetition, Chazal learn that just as they came to Sinai in repentance, so did they leave Refidim in repentance. Bnei Yisrael were attacked by Amalek at Refidim precisely because of their weakness in Torah learning. After that attack, they might have reasoned that Refidim was not spiritually conducive to teshuvah and waited until they reached Sinai to strengthen themselves in repentance.

The Torah emphatically negates such an attitude. If a person waits for the perfect time or place to undertake a new course in Torah, that ideal moment or place will never materialise. Had they not done teshuvah in Refidim, they would not have done teshuvah in the Sinai desert either.

There is another aspect to the requirement of abandoning oneself to Torah that is even more difficult than the forfeiture of material comforts – the attainment of humility. One must both be humble enough to learn from every man and to teach everyone, regardless of status. Even more importantly, he must be prepared to divest himself of all his preconceived ideas and beliefs. Only if one is prepared to let the Torah possess him and guide him totally, will its secrets be revealed.

All are blind until HaKadosh Baruch Hu opens their eyes (Bereishis Rabbah 53). When we view the world through our own eyes we are subject to our material desires and the distorting effects of passion and bias. Only when we let the Torah mold our thought processes can we view the world in its true perspective. There is no truer humility than subjugating one’s most precious possession, his mind, to the Torah.

In order to serve on the Sanhedrin, one had to be able to prove that a sheretz does not cause ritual impurity, even though the Torah explicitly says that it does. The judges had to recognize that with their own great mental acuity they could convince themselves of almost anything, and therefore needed to subject their own thinking to that of the Torah. The Rogachover Gaon once gave a shiur to his students in which he proved that chametz is permitted on Pesach. He then asked his students to refute his proof. They tried in vain to do so. When they gave up, the Rogachover opened the Chumash and read them “Do not eat chametz” (Shemos 13:3). That, he said, is the only refutation necessary. All the intellectual gymnastics in the world cannot alter one sentence in the Torah.

“The words of the wise are like prods” (Koheles 12:11). just as the prod directs the ox to plow in a straight line, so, too, does Torah guide and condition one to think in the paths of life (Chagiga 3b). SMA (to Choshen Mishpat 3 §13) comments that the thinking of baalei batim is opposite to that of Torah thinking. The intention is not to denigrate the layman, but to point out that when we rely on our own reasoning, distortion is the inevitable result. When we seek the guidance of gedolei Torah, we are seeking a mind so steeped in Torah – to the exclusion of all personal biases – that everything that they say or do is solely a reflection of their understanding of the Torah, i.e., daas Torah. Only a mind conditioned to thinking from God’s point of view, as revealed in the Torah, can view the world without distortion.

After their Exodus from Egypt, Bnei Yisrael needed to follow God into a harsh, howling desert, and place themselves totally in His care, before they could receive the Torah. And after the gift of the Torah, they still needed to be chastised time and again, as we read throughout Sefer Bamidbar, until they molded their attitudes and opinions to a Torah perspective.

Parsha Potpourri: Parshas Bamidbar-Shavuos

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Se’u es Rosh kol adas B’nei Yisroel (1:2)

There is a mystical idea that the content of the parsha read each Shabbos is connected to the events of the upcoming week. It is interesting to note that Parshas Bamidbar is usually read on the Shabbos preceding Shavuos. What possible connection could there be between a parsha which deals primarily with counting the tribes and the festival on which the Jewish nation received the Torah?

Rav Moshe Feinstein explains that as Jews around the world excitedly gear up to personally reaccept the Torah and reaffirm their commitments to its study, the evil inclination attempts to derail them. It argues that their Torah study is so limited in quantity and quality that it is insignificant and even, G-d forbid, a waste of time. The yetzer hara shows a person that his more intellectually-gifted friends are able to learn more hours and more pages and to retain their knowledge better than he could ever hope to do. As Jews get excited for the universal custom of staying up all night on Shavuos engrossed in Torah study, a person may be tempted to opt for a good night’s sleep after realizing that the most he could accomplish in an entire night could be learned on an even higher level by the Rav in a mere 10 minutes.

To counter this flawed argument, the Torah precedes the holiday of Shavuos with the reading of Parshas Bamidbar. The parsha begins with Hashem’s command to conduct a census of the Jewish people, but it is written using a peculiar expression. Instead of instructing Moshe to “go count the people,” the words used translate literally as “pick up the heads of the Jews.” Why did Hashem use this awkward expression when commanding Moshe about the census?

Rav Moshe explains that just as a contemporary Jew could get discouraged in his service of Hashem when comparing it to others, certainly one in the wilderness, who lived in the shadows of Moshe and Aharon, could be susceptible to the same fallacy. He may feel that although he is “worth” 1, those around him are “worth” 100, leaving him despondent. Hashem used this peculiar expression because when every Jew realizes that in the census he is counted as the same 1 as every other Jew, he will recognize how valuable his efforts are in Hashem’s eyes. This understanding will allow him to “pick up his head” and hold it high with a newfound self-confidence.

Although others may seem light-years ahead of us in the quantity and quality of their mitzvos, the lesson of Parshas Bamidbar is that everybody is judged separately in Hashem’s eyes, based on a personalized benchmark of what he is capable of doing. A person who overcomes his own struggles to maximize his individual potential should certainly enter Shavuos prepared to accept the Torah with his head held high.

Vayeilech ish mi’Beis Lechem Yehuda (Rus 1:1)

Megillas Rus begins by recording that due to a famine, Elimelech traveled with his family from the land of Israel to Moab. The Baal HaTurim notes that the expression “Vayeilech ish” – and a man went – appears two times in Tanach, once in reference to Elimelech and once in conjunction with the birth of Moshe (Shemos 2:1), “Vayeilech ish mi’beis Levi” – a man (Amram) from the house of Levi went (and married Yocheved, Moshe’s mother). As the use of this expression seems to connect Moshe with Megillas Rus, Rav Dovid Cohen points out a number of fascinating parallels between the lives of Moshe Rabbeinu and Dovid HaMelech in the introduction to his commentary on Megillas Rus,.

Moshe was considered the first redeemer, as he took us out of slavery in Egypt, and Dovid is associated with the final redeemer, as Moshiach will be descended from him. Moshe wrote the five books of the Torah, and Dovid’s Sefer Tehillim is divided into five books. The fathers of Moshe and Dovid – Amram and Yishai, respectively – are two of the four people whom the Gemora (Shabbos 55b) mentions as having died without ever sinning.

Moshe’s father-in-law Yisro was the first convert after the giving of the Torah, and Dovid was descended from Rus, who is considered the prototypical convert, from whom many of the laws of conversion are derived. In fact, the names Rus and Yisro contain the same letters except that Yisro has an additional “yud,” which has a numerical value of 10 and connotes the fact that he joined the Jewish people at the time of the Aseres HaDibros (10 Commandments).

The Medrash (Avos D’Rebbi Nosson 2:5) teaches that both Moshe and Dovid were both born already circumcised. Dovid was born and died on Shavuos, the day on which Moshe’s basket was placed into the Nile River (Shemos 2:3) and on which he later received the Torah. Rav Chaim Friedlander explains that this is because the purpose of a King is not just to lead the people and provide for their needs, but to make the nation accept Hashem’s Kingship and to make sure that they observe the Torah’s laws. In essence, Dovid and his descendants executed the very purpose for which Hashem gave the Torah to Moshe, and for this purpose he was born on the day that it was given.

Ki el asher tailchi ailaich (1:16)

Despite Naomi’s repeated attempts to persuade Rus to return to her homeland in Moab, Rus insisted that she would never part from Naomi, declaring passionately that she would go wherever Naomi went, would sleep wherever Naomi slept, Naomi’s G-d would be her G-d, and she would die and be buried together with Naomi.
Rashi understands that each of these promises made by Rus was her response to a specific mitzvah or concept that Naomi taught her in order to determine her commitment to Judaism. Specifically, Rashi explains that Naomi taught Rus about techum Shabbos (the boundary of the city beyond which one may not travel on Shabbos), yichud (forbidden seclusion between a man and a woman), the 613 mitzvos, idolatry, the four types of the death penalty which are meted out by the Sanhedrin, and the laws governing the burial of those who are killed for capital sins, respectively.

Why did Naomi teach these concepts specifically in this order? She went from the most lenient to the most stringent – beginning with the Rabbinical prohibition of techum Shabbos, followed by yichud which in some cases is Biblical, then the 613 commandments which are even more stringent, followed by idolatry, the death penalty, and separate burial even after death for severe sins. The Gemora in Yevamos (47a) derives from here that a potential convert is taught light mitzvos and stringent ones, which is difficult to understand. If he is willing to accept the strict fundamentals of Judaism such as idolatry, wouldn’t he automatically accept the less stringent mitzvos? Why do we need to specifically inform him of these areas as well? The Meiri explains the need for light mitzvos because non-Jews can’t comprehend that Hashem could care about and have laws governing “trivial” activities such as the order in which we get dressed and the way in which we go to the bathroom.

Judaism, on the other hand, believes that there is no place void of Hashem and spirituality, and we sanctify even seemingly mundane physical activities. A non-Jew believes in a separation, that our earthly human needs have no connection to holiness and are in fact intrinsically irreconcilable with it. Their “holy” people take vows of chastity and poverty. Therefore, if a non-Jew brings an offering to the Temple, it must be completely burned on the Altar, because he is unable to comprehend that eating could have anything to do with piety and sanctity. We therefore emphasize this point to a prospective convert to make sure that he understands and accepts this fundamental idea in Judaism.

L’mi ha’naarah ha’zos (2:5)

When Boaz observed Rus gleaning in his field, he asked his servant who she was. The Gemora (Shabbos 113b) finds this behavior unusual, questioning, “Was it the way of Boaz to constantly inquire about women?” The Gemora answers that Boaz saw in Rus two traits which piqued his interest: wisdom and modesty. Rashi explains that her modesty manifested itself when she collected standing ears of grain while standing up, but for stalks on the ground, she sat down to pick them up instead of bending over.

At this point in time, there was tremendous confusion regarding the legal permissibility of marrying a female Moabite such as Rus. Rav Dovid Cohen suggests that the tznius (modesty) demonstrated by Rus helped convince Boaz that she was permitted. The Torah provides the reason that one may not marry a Moabite or Ammonite (Devorim 23:4-5): because they didn’t come out to greet you with bread and water when you were leaving Egypt. In arguing for the permissibility of marrying female Moabites who have converted to Judaism, the Gemora in Yevamos (77b) suggests that this was only a complaint against the males, who were expected to come out to greet us, but the females were not expected to come out because it would be considered immodest.

The Gemora questions this reasoning, as even though it would not be modest to come out to greet the male Jews, they still should have come out to greet the females. The Gemora answers that all of the glory of the King’s daughter is inside, so it is not considered a deficiency on the part of the female Moabites that they did not do so. Nevertheless, Rav Dovid Cohen suggests that Boaz felt that it was necessary to demonstrate that the trait of modesty does in fact run in the Moabite national gene pool, and when he saw the tznius of Rus, this helped confirm for him her permissibility.

However, although it is praiseworthy that Rus was so modest while collecting, this doesn’t answer the Gemora’s question. Weren’t other Jewish women equally tznius? Did Boaz inquire about every modest Jewish woman that he encountered? Rav Moshe Dovid Valle explains that poverty can destroy all semblance of a person’s humanity, as he becomes so focused and fixated on his hunger and need for survival that he forgets all other considerations. Even at this difficult time, Rus conducted herself with dignity, and her tznius remained intact and attracted Boaz’s attention. Boaz was astonished by her ability to preserve her equanimity, in contrast to the other poor collectors, who were lenient when it came to concerns of modesty and stealing grain to which they weren’t entitled.

Rav Shlomo Brevda adds that this is even more amazing when considering that Rus was descended from Lot, who was lacking specifically in these two areas. His shepherds was admonished by Avrohom’s shepherds for allowing their sheep to graze in fields that didn’t belong to him (Rashi Bereishis 13:7), and Lot immodestly bore children through his own daughters (Bereishis 19:30-38). In light of this, Boaz couldn’t help but be overwhelmed by Rus’s strength, which explains why he asked his servant, “Who is this woman, and from where did she get such tremendous determination?”

Answers to the weekly Points to Ponder are now available!
To receive the full version with answers email the author at oalport@optonline.net.

Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

1) The Torah emphasizes (1:1) that the giving of the Torah at Sinai, which is celebrated on the upcoming holiday of Shavuos, took place in the wilderness. Why did Hashem specifically choose to give the Torah in such a barren location? (Darkei Mussar)

2) Parshas Bamidbar contains Hashem’s instructions regarding the placement of the encampment of the various tribes (2:2). The events of the parsha occurred approximately one year after the Exodus from Egypt (1:1). Why didn’t Hashem instruct them regarding the order of the encampments during their first year in the wilderness? (Emes L’Yaakov)

3) Rashi writes (2:2) that the tribes encamped 2000 cubits away from the Mishkan so that they would still be permitted to travel there on Shabbos. As the prohibition against traveling outside of the techum is only Rabbinical in nature, why were they required to encamp within 2000 cubits of the Mishkan? (Ayeles HaShachar)

4) On the night of Pesach, we say that if Hashem had brought us before Mount Sinai, but not given us the Torah, it would have been enough for us. What would have been the benefit of coming to Mount Sinai if Hashem didn’t give us the Torah? (HaSeder HaAruch pg. 414-415, Nesivos Rabboseinu, Mishmeres Ariel)

5) The Gemora in Shabbos (88a) teaches that when the Jews were encamped at the foot of Sinai, Hashem lifted the mountain above them like a barrel and threatened them that if they don’t accept the Torah, “sham te’hei kevuraschem” – there will be your burial place. Wouldn’t it be more grammatically correct to say ôä – here – you will be buried? (Peninim MiShulchan Gevoha)

© 2012 by Oizer Alport.

Steven Mostofsky Announces Candidacy For Judge

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Steven Mostofsky, a lawyer who served as president of National Council of Young Israel (NCYI) for 11 years, has announced his candidacy for Civil Court. A lifelong Brooklyn resident, Mostofsky has worked in the New York State court system and has a family law practice in the borough.

“Public service has defined my life,” says Mostofsky, a 54-year-old father and grandfather who was raised in East Flatbush and Canarsie and currently lives in Midwood. “For many years it has been my dream to serve as a judge combining my love for justice and the law, while serving the people of Brooklyn.”

Outside his law practice, Mostofsky regularly counsels families struggling with issues that affect their daily lives. He has lectured about domestic violence to assistant district attorneys and health-care professionals and taught Continuing Legal Education (CLE) courses. His articles about Jewish law’s convergence with secular law, teen alcoholism and other legal and general interest have appeared in many publications. Mostofsky was profiled last year in both The New York Law Journal and Daily News about his wide-ranging legal, scholarly and community-based interests. He is a recognized expert in get law who has spoken on the subject at court proceedings.

As longtime president of NCYI, a century-old, worldwide philanthropic organization with more than 25,000 member families, Mostofsky developed programs, sent packages to U.S. troops in Iraq, raised funds to protect communities living under the threat of terrorism and established a scholarship fund for needy yeshiva students in Brooklyn. He held the leadership position until December 2011.

Just this past Monday, May 21, Mostofsky and his wife, Aviva, were honored by Ateret Cohanim and its Executive Director, Shani Hikind, at the organization’s 33rd Annual Yom Yerushalayim Dinner at Terrace on the Park in Queens. The Mostofskys were presented with the Ohev Yisroel Award for their work in helping to rekindle the flame of Jewish life in Jerusalem.

Mostofsky notes that his professional mentors, Family Court Judge Leon Deutsch and Supreme Court Justice Barry Hurowitz, ingrained in him “the moral and social responsibility that comes with the task of meting out justice” and taught him that “it’s the ‘why,’ not just the ‘what,’ that matters.”

“I understand people, I understand the law and I understand how equal justice is essential to our society – especially in these difficult times,” he says.

The election will be on Thursday September 13.

BOROPARKSCOOP.COM