Reply To: R' Chaim Kanievski Women Wearing Tefillin

Daasyochid:

The way I understood R’ Chaim is that he is saying that the Targum Yonasan holds that it’s an issur of lo yihyeh kli gever al isha BECAUSE we don’t say ???? ?????? ???? and that this is the reason for the man d’amar in the psikta that says that the chachamim protested Michal. The Beis Yosef says that the source for the Kol Bo is the psikta i.e. the reason why the Chachamim protested was due to guf naki. Now according to R’ Chaim the reason why they protested was much more basic – it’s an issur of lo yihyeh kli gever al isha. According to this there is no source that there is a problem of guf naki. Now since we pasken ???? ?????? ????, the psikta’s objection is obviated and there is no reason to invent a new objection. It comes out that R’ Chaim is either arguing with the Kol Bo’s interpretation of the psikta or he is arguing with the Beis Yosef and says that the Kol Bo agrees to his interpretation of the psikta but is choshesh for the man d’amar that we don’t say ???? ?????? ????.