simcha613 – “The Rama is clear that a woman is obligated to learn the practical things. The S”A however opens up that they get sechar for learning, but they don’t get as much sechar as a man because they aren’t obligated to do it! Obviously he is not talking about the practical areas, because they are obligated to learn those things and would get the same sechar as a man! The S”A meant she gets sechar for those areas of Torah where she isn’t obligated to learn like the non practical areas of Torah Sheba’al Peh, but it’s not allowed to be taught to her. How do we reconcile these two statements? I stand by what I said before. It can’t be imposed on women in general but a woman who is lishmah can learn and will receive sechar.”
I wouldn’t expect you to admit that you are wrong. Since you don’t understand the S’A you decided to throw out the part of Tiflos and say it only applies Shelo Lishma. This is totally ridiculous. If there was a Mitzva for them to learn everything then it wouldn’t make a difference whether it was Lishma or not.
Ever hear of Mitoch Shelo Lisma Boh Lishma. I know what you’ll say -I decided this doesn’t apply to women.
Your agenda (Negious) is causing you to Krum up the Halacha of S’A. Me personally your Kashos on that Simon of S’A aren’t that great to change the Poshut Pshat. But for you that thinks these Kashos are so great we have to say women are allowed and get a Mitzva for learning everything I’ll give you an answer. On the other topic a poster brings down the Sefer Chassidim and he says even though you can teach them the Halachos that apply to them, don’t go to deep. So you can simply say when the S’A says they get Sechar for learning it means learning things that applies to them and they get Sechar even if they learn deep. So you have no Rayah that the S’A permitted women learning All Torah Shebaal Peh!