Health
“Who says?”
The constitution.
“I happen not to have a problem with that interpretation, but what I just posted was to make a point!”
What is your point? Especially if you do in fact agree with the courts on the one example you cited to show how courts discriminate against Jews?
“”Care to mention an example?”
Why don’t you read the topic before you come here to post?!?
Start from the beginning and you won’t have such silly questions!”
It is an excellent question one that has been asked of you by several posters. and by myself 3 times. You have yet to answer.
Here it is a third time:
So when you said “Stop with the liberal lies! Name one area of jobs – where it’s Not required to work Friday afternoon!”
It was in fact you who was lying? Or do you want me to start listing jobs?
“I think that your whole purpose is to prove me wrong, in order to push your liberal agenda!”
No it is to see if when you are clearly wrong (for example when you say there is one job that can take off Friday afternoon, when theri are in fact hundreds) You can say you were wrong.
“But I’ll answer this one!”
You dint answer the question. You said their are no such jobs
” If the employer isn’t nice, they could make up any story why they can’t give off!”
So the thousands upon thousands of frum professionals in hundreds of careers who take of Friday afternoon all have nice employers?
dbrim
” did you intentionally misconstrue or simply misunderstand my post:”
Mostly the latter.
“this is what Obama and other liberals call islamic terrorist attacks”
He called Nice “workplace violence”? Paris? Brussels? Boston?
“We should be concerned because these attacks are on the rise and it matters what we call these terrorist attacks because if we call these attacks workplace violence,”
Ah but that wasnt my question. The question was why is it so important to call it “Radical Islam” Calling it terrorism makes sense. But insulting allies who we need to combat terrorism doesnt really make sense.
“but if it’s Islamic terrorism, then we should probably scrutinize our immigration policies sans trump (did you get the sarcasm or should I explain?)”
You’ll need to explain. sarcastic or not that line doesnt make sense (sans means without)
“(I am not voting for supporting Israel, unless there is such an election)”
There isnt, which is why that line didnt make sense much like the rest of your post.
“I was insinuating (do you know what that means?) that you don’t support Israel but I apologize – it was a little judgemental of me.”
I know, yes and apology accepted
“In any event, once you pull the Daas Torah card, the discussion ends”
Not in this election. The 3 rabbonim IVe spoken are all in the #never trump camp. One going so far as to say anyone who votes for trump isnt a ben torah.
” the discussion ends,”
discussion never ends. That is what makes us human: The ability to think and by extension discuss.
“She will probably win,”
Amen
” and when the results are disasterous we can all laugh at you and say “Told you so”.”
At least we will live to laugh…