Crone,
So now the argument against vaccines uses medical research by doctors and pharmaceutical companies?
a. It is not been proven to be preventive, rather used to reduce tumors. Basically this means that regardless if the patient had measles in the past or had a vaccine against measles, It will not change their future chances of getting or not getting the disease, rather the virus can be used as an attempt to reduce the tumor.
Stating that contracting measles prevents cancers is inaccurate and misleading. In fact if one already has antibodies for measles it makes the viral treatment less effective.
b. The treatment trials actually injected the patients with an attenuated modified virus, does this now mean that vaccines are preventive against cancers? of course they are not, yet there is hope that with continued research (by big pharma and spooky doctors) they will eventually be able to use modified viruses as part of certain treatment modalities against some cancers.
Regarding your comment about measles just being a nuance.
a. There is a high admission rate especially for younger patients with some requiring ICU admissions due to the severity of the symptoms.
b. The data suggests that there are permanent disabilities and potential delayed mortality’s associated with the measles virus.
Are you suggesting that the facts and science are incorrect?