“you are only willing to discuss abortion in cases of severe circumstances
Now your claiming only to discuss post birth abortion.”
I’m not sure what you mean. That thread was about abortions of necessity. This was about “infanticide” (not abortion). In each thread I’m discussing the topic of discussion.
“Post birth abortion, while not legal yet, (it means that a mother has the right to kill her baby”
That’s called murder not abortion. Keep terms straight so conversation scare meangingful.
there is no democratic candidate who calls for infanticide. Or “post birth abortion”. As I said. If you want to obsfucate and saysay oh but xyz. You can.
But first let’s stick to the original “infanticide”
Can you name s democratic candidate who supports that?
“, for what is really the difference between killing the baby when it’s inside her or killing it twenty minutes later when it’s outside her, a position who’s lomdus happens to be totally correct. Just reversed.)”
That’s a position that is completely incorrect. And the polar opposite of lomdus . Halacha is full of drawing lines. A minute before shabbos starts you can light a fire a minute after you getcskikah. C’mon its just wanted be minute what’s the difference? Are you for real?
Once rov gufo emerges ” abortion” (it’s not abortion at that point) is not allowed even if the mother is at risk. C’mon 20 minutes it was . Is that what you are saying?
“The quotes are brought to show what the top candidates in the current presidential election hold in regards to the overall idea of abortion.”
Shkoyach!
But that’s not the subject of this thread .
I am discuss ing “infanticide” if you can’t provide a demo crat calling for that just say so. Don’t say irrelevant nonsense