“7% is the percentage of AT-RISK patients who die”
source please
“Apparently you don’t realize that every hospitalized patient started off as a so called “walking ill”.”
sometimes yes, sometimes no.
“Just to go over it again, that means if you take a random sample of 500 at-risk people who have symptoms, about 30 should end up dying. Agreed?”
key owrds: “random sample”
“So if a Dr. Like Dr. Zelnko treats 500 random at-risk patients, ”
Yes! If he did that.
but……. he didnt do that. As IVe been saying over and over HE SELECTED the walking well. He is limited to Kiryas Joel (maybe they have extra fluoride in the water that helps? maybe they have a better hospital system, it isnt random”
“Agreed? Great!”
It is great!
You finally get it. To have meaning, he would need to take a “random sample” (your words)
He didnt, thus his data s not necessarily generalizable.
Again and toeb crystal clear: He may be right (as Ive said in the first comment and about every other comment since then). but his data does not show that As YOU acknowedge by the fact that you stuck in the word ” random” which is not what happened