Reply To: Fauci’s Fraudulent Fearmongering

@yserbius123

>I gave you answers to all of your questions<

No you didn’t.
You did not explain why the speed limit should not be lower.
You twice made up differences between Covid and the flu.
You used the meaningless phrase “clear and present danger”.
You made false claims about the flu.
But you never gave a satisfactory answer.
And now you’re trying to threaten me with “I’m not answering again until you answer these two”?
Do you think I need this conversation to continue?
Remember, if we don’t come to a consensus, my position – as the default position – wins.

Ah, but why should we part on such hostile terms? How can we forget all the uh.. good times we’ve had?
So in the spirit of me being a weak pushover, I’ll grant you the answers you so desire:

1. Speed limits fall under the category of “Misuse of public property”
2. First of all, it’s extremely ironic that you’re asking this question in the very thread in which I expose an “expert opinion” and am found to be right, but I digress.
   Suppose we accept those “expert opinions” to be legit, you are still making a severe fallacy when you use science as ethics.
   When science shows that masks slow the spread, it means that masks slow the spread. Period. No more and no less. The next question is: Should we be required to wear masks? That question is an ethical one, and no “expert medical opinion” has more authority on it than me and you.
   So please keep them out.

Now that I gave you answers to all of your questions, and repeated several of them. I’m not answering again until you answer these two:

1. Why should speed limits not be as low as possible in order to reduce deaths?
2. Why are the near-unanimous expert opinions of epidemiologists and doctors that children should mask despite the fact that the flu is deadlier for them than covid not enough proof that those guys are just ruthless dictators?