@torahvaluesoverparty and @SyagLchochma The problem with doing your own research is that you’re not a researcher (unless you are? I don’t know you guys). You are unfamiliar with polling processes, how things usually work, and the vocabulary.
Nobody, and I do mean this literally, who is honest with themselves and did a deep dive into the voting fraud claims can say that Trump may have won.
As I illustrated in my previous comment, even a cursory examination of some of the strongest claims shows a lot of glaring holes and inconsistencies. Like for example the claim that 250,000 Arizona (not Michigan as you erroneously said) votes were switched from Trump to Biden, when that really means 250,000 adjudicated ballots and the number 250,000 appears no where outside of Mike Lindell’s videos.
I mean, I’m sorry guys, but I’m not going to chase down every single source for every single fraud claim being made. Because I’ve chased enough of them to pure fantasy land, and if that’s any indication, the rest are unlikely to be any stronger.
So far, the worst thing to come out of the Maricopa audit is the name of the audit team, “Cyber Ninjas”. Ugh. Did they hire a 10 year old boy to do their naming?