@syag-lchochma I’m not a researcher, but I work in a place that does a ton of scientific research, so I know a thing or two. Also, one of my hobbies is arguing on the Internet, so I’ve gotten pretty good at tracking down claims and separating fact from fiction.
To address your points specifically, you didn’t really give anything specific enough for me to comment on. You say you know people whose votes were manipulated. How? Where? How do they know?
You say you’ve heard the dispositions and are ignoring the news around them. Well so have I. @Health focused on one by a poll worker named Jessy Jacob, so let’s reiterate my comments on that. On the surface it sounds pretty damning, she claims she witnessed voter intimidation and changing dates on the ballots. So I read the news reports and followed those to the judges ruling. She was unable to provide anything specific enough to warrant a trial, no names, no places, no times, not even a date, she just kept repeating vague claims about intimidation. When questioned about the ballot date changes, the judge realized that she was simply ignorant of the procedures and what she thought she saw was actually something else entirely!
Look, if there’s some solid piece of evidence that that a significant number of votes were changed, I’m all ears. But the most I’ve seen from primary sources (not silly videos by pillow salesmen, nor rumors heard in shul) were people saying “Well, it’s not clear what happened, so if if if may may may possibly possibly possibly”.
@Health Thanks for pointing out a specific time in the video. I watched the first five minutes and found the numbers you’re talking about. He lists about eight or ten counts of votes that he claims should have gone to Trump, the largest of which was the 250,000 adjudicated Arizona ballots.
I’m glad we’re finally coming to a consensus. You admit that I am right and the three numbers from Lindell’s chart that I picked at complete random are false. I am not going to bother discussing the others, because they already are in chazaka to be as false as the ones mentioned.
Oh, and Scytl does not have a subsidiary in Germany. If I am wrong about that, then you can prove it by stating its name and telling me a place where I can find their connection to the Spanish company Scytl.
I think that covers both claims I agreed to discuss, shall we call it quits?