Health,
“ The only one that can be called a Sham is You and anybody else who Blindly follows the Corrupt Government!”
No substance there.
“ I take everything at face value, until I find differently.”
Pretty low standard, don’t expect the rest of us to follow suite.
With regards to the “study” you posted, on the actual study it only has 21 people enrolled (21 in total!).
They make the following remark.
“We are perfectly aware of the pragmatic nature of our study and of the possible limits of our results, having a small number of patients per group, and not being obtained in double-blind and in placebo-controlled conditions. Anyway, these results are preliminary, and the study is still ongoing.“
But more importantly…
Disclosure
“FDP belongs to the Scientific Board of Pharmextracta. AB is a Pharmextracta consultant. PA, ST and AR belong to the Scientific Board of Indena. ST & PA are employees of Indena SpA, producer of Quercetin Phytosome (ingredient used in the trial). AR reports a patent WO2019016146A1 pending.“
So in short, Phatmextracta did a extremely limited “study” using a very low number of participants, which makes any observation limited or useless. Only to promote a drug they manufacture.
I guess this is “evidence” and one of the 278 studys posted on that sham website if yours.