Health,
It seems that you have different definitions of lying.
While you have taken your information from the sham website, I simply did a google search and read the actual “study” that was done by the people that manufacture the drug, that you were referring to, which even according to them, was not only extremely limited but was focused on prophylaxis. . (and btw, it has one anonymous peer review, so now they can also write in the subject peer-reviewed..)
Based on your posts it so seems that whatever treatments you were advocating for, were done so without any factual data, rather something as you have stated came up yourself.
When questioned, you stated that it was in some Medscape article, yet that was incorrect. It was in some sham website that is designed to portray legitimacy when it’s anything but legitimate.
People should have a concern as to the objective behind those planting these websites (similar content, different URLs) and misinformation on social media that plants mistrust and confusion that is unfounded and unsubstantiated.
“I always thought Jewish PCP’s cared about the pts.
It’s obvious that most don’t, but some do.
You’re from the “Most”!”
You have no clue who I am, what my credentials or area of expertise are, or if I even have any credentials to begin with. All of that is irrelevant in an anonymous forum. It is the content and its substance that matters. I also have no clue who you are, and all the investing you have done in your online persona, and frankly, I don’t care. Let the facts speak for themselves.
Furthermore, we are discussing the efficacy of a treatment for the virus, being engaged, knowledgeable and up to date is a sign of caring, regardless of religious affiliation. Being emotional, locked onto your own treatment without regard to actual data and facts, is not at all a sign of caring.