BY12
your comment seems geared to me “Today the argument has migrated to they can’t care for their children so we should encourage them to kill them. This was actually Margaret Sangers actual stated philosophy. You were mechaven to that monsters daas. Yasher koiach. Ubiquitin the Eugenicist.”
But that isnt what I said. Newsflash MArgaret Sanger is dead. Her views arent relevent .
I noticed you didnt answer my question nor address any of my points
Here is my question again:
Just So I have this straight. The guys waving swastikas, chanting “Jews will not replace us” who say Blacks are inferior and should be slaves, but opposes abortion, Is less racist than , say a black single woman trying to put herself through school/ work to get ahead in life who is saddled with an unwanted pregnancy ** Is that correct?
If you can’t or won’t answer my question thats fine. Just leave me out of your comments .
I don’t understand most of what you wrote as you use “You” and “your” a lot but nothing you said relates t o any of my numerous points I made to you .
Again I don’t expect you to address m actual points, I realzie you are merely repeating Rigth wing talking points, without actually knowing what you re talking about (eg ““It created a constitutional right out of thin air “) this was another winner “because blacks can’t care for themselves we should make it legal to murder their babies” Who is “we…murder”? and why limit to blacks?
But at least a simple question deserves an answer.
Or not, in which case move on
here it is again
Just So I have this straight. The guys waving swastikas, chanting “Jews will not replace us” who say Blacks are inferior and should be slaves, but opposes abortion, Is less racist than , say a black single woman trying to put herself through school/ work to get ahead in life who is saddled with an unwanted pregnancy ** Is that correct?