somejew:
The whole foundation of the shalosh shevios, as well explained by the maharal is that we must maintain the gezairas hagalis and are forbidden to directly work against. Part of the gezairas hagalis are the many pogroms and violence, lo alaini, that klal yisroel suffers through. The Maharal says explicitly that even if all the non-Jews got together and told use you MUST go to eretz yisroel, rebuild the Beis Hamikdosh, and reinstate a Torah kingdom, if they did that under real threat of DEATH, chas v’shulem, if we don’t listen to them, we would STILL NOT be allowed to break the shevios and we Jews would be obligated to give up our lives instead of breaking the shevios.
To be clear, the Maharal says the obligation to keep the 3 shevios is more important than pekiach nefesh (as is obviously true for every ‘yharog val tavor’).
If my answer is not simple enough or you want to get into it more, I would request that you start a new CR thread and tr to formulate a full meaningful question that at at least tries to understand the above foundation of the Maharal that considers what you understand the answer(s) presented might be. With that, I and others can have more clarity on what you a/re missing or where your criticism might be well directed.
=====
This you want to use to mafkir damam of millions of your brothers and sisters in EY ?
Without any give and take with our greatest living rabanim ?
Is this normative halachik practise ?
Millions of piskei hiyuvei mita [r’l] in the course of two minutes of typing , being medameh milta lemilta ON YOUR OWN , based on a supposed statement of maharal on agada without even a source in the footnote ?
—
I , in your place , would be ashamed of myself ….
.
.