000646 -“Health, The point here is simple.
I believe that using the fact that you can refuse to sell a service that someone else needs (facilitating a get), in order to get them to buy additional services from you (arbitration of custody etc.), is wrong. Especially if the person is willing to pay you well for the service they are asking for. You disagree. Again if you don’t see how this is wrong I really cannot explain it to you any clearer!”
Here we go again & again. For the millionth time -It’s not a separate service. It’s all part of the divorce process.
“I have a problem with using the fact that someone in your community needs a service that only you offer, to coerce them into buying more services from you. Especially when the service you are coercing them to buy does not have everything any reasonable person would expect for that service (i.e oversight, right to appeal etc.)”
For the millionth & one time – they aren’t two separate services!
“That being said we are going in circles here and apparently I am offending everyone. Maybe we can agree to disagree….”
Oh, I agree with you. A lot of Bottei Dinim are corrupt. Stop focusing on a Naarishkeit (a little thing). Rant about real Rishous. And even more secular courts are corrupt. But one day all these Judges (Yid & Goy) will be in the final Judgment. Then all their victims will have a permanent revenge.
“and I just pray you never have to go through this system?”
Well maybe the next marriage. The last one ended in divorce.