which ‘both’ do you mean?
both of the following cannot be true unless…. (sentence finished later)
1) rav blumenkrantz was of the opinion that rav moshe would have permitted the makeup. other poskim disgree with this inference of rav blumenkrantz. they believe that rav moshe would not have perimitted it.
2) the other poskim agree with rav blumenkrantz’s conclusion about rav moshe but they themselves disagree with rav moshe in this matter. they themselves forbid the makeup.
these are mutually exclusive
…. unless we are talking about a different set of poskim.
I maintain that important poskim who fobid it take position 1.
that is based on the vehemence of their objection. )
however, throughout you keep referring to “rav moshe’s heter” and also say that rav moshe was a daas yochid in this matter. thus agreeng that rav moshe (and almost only rav moshe) would have permitted it. You also say that no makeup complies with “rav moshes heter” thus disagreeing with rav blumenkrantz. these are not compatible.
Good night.