April 12, 2013 5:59 pm at 5:59 pm #945528Torah613TorahParticipant
Squeak: Where can he reach you?April 12, 2013 6:06 pm at 6:06 pm #945529Rabbi PerfectMember
ok so in bes din shel matah what sentencing did he receive?April 12, 2013 8:14 pm at 8:14 pm #945530I can only tryMember
Per the NY Post, four to twelve years.April 12, 2013 9:09 pm at 9:09 pm #945531Rabbi PerfectMember
thank you, I was wondering because I really wanted him to get the maximum sentencing. He took away a very special person, who happened to be a very good friend of mine.April 12, 2013 11:07 pm at 11:07 pm #945532
oom read my phrasing again. if you thought between the infinites i meant only ordinary numbers then you would have to interpret between 0 and 1 the same way.
So you are saying that since there is only one class of infinite set that you would be referring to between zero and one, you should logically interpret any other classes of infinity being referred to in the same context as the same, yes? I think the opposite–since there can be more types of infinity in reference to the continuum than in reference to the space between zero and one, you cannot establish any sort of parallelism with which you could reasonably perform that induction. (i. e. I don’t see how you can claim it is intuitive.)April 14, 2013 2:07 am at 2:07 am #945533squeakParticipant
You’re trying way too hard, and it’s cracking me up.April 14, 2013 2:16 am at 2:16 am #945534
and you are snorting me up with your charming condescension. -_-April 15, 2013 3:21 am at 3:21 am #945535I can only tryMember
FWIW, I think “squeak” is cheppering you, not being condescending.
You’re both way over my my head with the math terminology.
Oh, and I don’t get the -_- emoticon either.April 15, 2013 6:03 am at 6:03 am #945536HaLeiViParticipant
Please explain why you say that the numbers are equal. Between 1 and 2 you have all those numbers of between 0 and 1, and this goes on ad infinitum (v’ad bichlal).April 15, 2013 11:10 am at 11:10 am #945537TheGoqParticipant
Will the Chicago Cubs ever win the World Series again? 105 years of misery thus far.April 15, 2013 7:07 pm at 7:07 pm #945538
Icot: hmmmm still don’t see it that way. water under the bridge, though.
I usually use the -_- to express annoyance. Kinda like the counterpart to ^_^ I guess. It’s a multipurpose emoticon, though.April 15, 2013 8:24 pm at 8:24 pm #945539playtimeMember
one of many- dont meen to interrupt, but every time u post, you evoke Dolores Umbridge wi a purple hat ^_^ (and the eyebrows)
sorry- just had to say thatApril 15, 2013 9:00 pm at 9:00 pm #945540squeakParticipant
oom- I apologize for coming across as condescending. I saw your defense as a long shot and I thought the tone of my reply was dismissive, but light hearted. I can see how you thought it wasn’t. Sorry.April 15, 2013 9:05 pm at 9:05 pm #945541
no worries. s’all good. 🙂April 15, 2013 9:07 pm at 9:07 pm #945542Torah613TorahParticipant
The Goq: No, they won’t. (Now you can’t stone me for being a navi sheker, since if they do teshuva, they could win) (5:07)April 15, 2013 9:08 pm at 9:08 pm #945543
talmud: yoish and this is why I like to go by Tonks D: (hem hem 42)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.