- This topic has 61 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by .
-
Posts
-
Or is it just me?
I DO
If I could understand the question maybe I would answer…
I’m normal. My doctor has said that I am ABsolutely normal. Actually he just abbreviated with ABnormal.
Normals and non-normals can live in harmony despite the fact that normality stifles creativity, knowledge and intelligence.
rebyidd23
i guess your not normal if you are posting in ywn cr
HEY MOD…. HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE OP MEANT??
Who said he/she meant PEOPLE???
Now you’re making MY comment seem foolish. OK, well, everyone – look at the URL (EVEN A MIGHTY MOD CAN’T CHANGE THAT!!!)
Well if everyone is crazy around here we must all be normal
I don’t think that the fact that I post is proof I’m not normal.
thats not the only way i know your not normal
Only those of us engaged in Bitul Torah.
It’s no secret that I’m not normal.
No
Normal people. WHAT’S THAT?!?
Well I’M here. I hope that answers your question! One way or the other…
Depends on what you call normal
Okay, Hashemisreading. I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with being normal, but there is help if you want it.
It’s not really a problem that you’re normal. It’s just that abnormal people are better and it’s possible to become one with help.
Only a normal person could ask that.
Rebyid: I think you’re normal.GET OUT!
I have an answer. I just happened to give you something that wasn’t instead.
Some are normal.
The remainder can be found on shidduch threads, Zionism threads, and gefilte fish threads.
You are welcome.
Why did you have to bring gefilte fish into this?
Gefilte fish did nothing to deserve being a pawn in your example.
Charlie Hall: “Only those of us engaged in Bitul Torah.”
Well, I guess that means that all the womenfolk here are abnormal and all the men are normal.
lb: CAN YOU PLEASE stop asking questions on comments from 10 months ago? This is not a current thread.
We’re not abnormal. In fact we’re an even higher level of normal than men.
We’re supernormal.
Hey, at least it’s not 10 years :). And at least almost all of these posters actually still post, including both the OP and the one that LB was responding to.
I’m guessing that MDG was hinting at the dialog from one of my favorite scenes in “Young Frankenstein”:
Dr.F: Would you mind telling me who’s brain I did put in?
Igor: And you won’t be angry?
Dr.F: I will *NOT* be angry!
Igor: Abbie Someone.
Dr.F: Abbie Someone. Abbie who?
Igor: Abbie Normal.
Dr.F: Abbie Normal!
Igor: I’m almost sure that was the name.
Dr.F: Ha, ha…Are you saying that I put an abnormal brain into a 7 and a half foot long, 54 inch wide GORILLA…Is that what you’re telling me???!!!
I can only speak for myself. Absolutely not.
Who read the CT Rules before their first post? I did. That’s another reason why I’m working with previous threads.
Did I misinterpret their rules?
Enter Exhibit #1:
“4 – Before starting a new topic do a quick check to see if the topic exists.”
Citation:
****RULES OF THE YWN COFFEE ROOM – PLEASE READ****
It says you should do a quick check before starting the new topic. It doesn’t say that if it already exists, you cannot start it again.
lb: you can state something like – “renewing thread”. This way posters know that it is and old thread being revisited.
iacisrmma: Thanks. I notice on imamother threads in such cases start with S/O for spin-off
You may want to limit your reading there – for your own sake
I just ask that “lb” start her comment / question with something like (5 years ago you wrote….). This way we know it’s an old thread revisited.
OK. To answer the OP… Bet he’s waiting five years for my reply..
And the answer is – ever since I left the CR no <<oops, I don’t want to speak L”H>>
“ever since I left the CR no”
methinks you are still here. unless you are a figment of my imagination.
This sentence can’t be true until you go, and then you won’t be here to write it.
iacisrmma: I’ll make a note of the time lapse only if you spell out your username phonetically please
how is it pronounced, and what does it mean? I’ve always wondered.
I wonder what the very first post in the coffee room was
You have to read the URL to understand the third and seventh post.
and LuL:
That was some joke, sort of, just like the part of no L”H. (to spell it out – if it would be L”H, then to say “I don’t want speak L’H..” would also constitute L”H. OH).
To reiterate: a joke is …
uh, LF – if you want to understand my post, read your last post. To reiterate, a joke is…. (why are you so doubtful about my intelligence lately, and why do you keep making these assumptions that I do not understand your posts?)
I do not c”v doubt your intelligence. I just think that sometimes you’re low duck, and my petty quips slip right past, and you won’t realize it was only in jest..
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.