Dogma stunts moral agency

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Dogma stunts moral agency

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2551970
    nevuah
    Participant

    Dogma and extremist mindsets significantly distort moral agency by replacing nuanced ethical reasoning with rigid, black-and-white thinking and moral disengagement. This process is driven by both psychological and neuropsychological mechanisms that prioritize group loyalty and emotional certainty over objective moral evaluation.

    Dogmatic thinking creates a closed cognitive system where individuals accept beliefs without criticism and reject opposing viewpoints, effectively halting critical moral reasoning And personal responsibility. This rigidity leads to moral disengagement, where harmful actions are justified as serving a higher good or protecting the group’s group think. Consequently, individuals surrender personal responsibility to a larger ideology or authority, allowing them to rationalize behavior that would normally violate their moral code. The belief in one’s own moral righteousness becomes absolute, fostering intolerance and justifying character assassination and opression as necessary defenses of truth.

    I’m talking to you qweurty

    #2552115
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To the Group

    What nevuah is saying is that those who accept and adhere to the teachings of Pirkei Avos and Rambam and Rashi and the Gaon etc. are dogmatic extremists. Tell that worthless kofer, checkmate. There is some good news. He has no spelling mistakes except for my name. lol It’s only a matter of time til I break this nut job.

    #2552131
    doom777
    Participant

    Yes, and?

    #2552218
    nevuah
    Participant

    Qwerty. Stop adding stuff I never said. Ok? Thank you. But nice try tho. 50/50 for effort

    #2552231
    johnnysmith
    Participant

    Hello??? Where are the mods to shut down this coffee room? Every thread has become a vicious debate about zionism… Even the most random discussion becomes the same debate of everyone vs qwerty, ujm and hakatan… YWN, its time to shut down this “Kosher Chat Room” you’ve created… For as we all know, that’s all the coffee room is…. Your classic online chat room that happens to be on a Jewish site, so people can lie to themselves and think they’re not wasting hours upon hours of their lives in “real” chatrooms….

    Shut it down.

    All who agree with me, please say “aye”. (No long posts please…. Just say “aye”)

    #2552235
    nevuah
    Participant

    Dogma stunts moral agency and makes people regress backwards. Actually it keeps people stuck in a fear based mindset which impacts agency and human connection. Can influence and make people morally corrupted and or stunted in many many ways.
    Too much focus on rigidity doesn’t allow for true human conscience to become the seat of a person’s life something that is neccisary for moral reasoning.
    Dogma leads to corruption of moral choices. Cruelty…anger. Hostility. Control. Fear. When focused outwardly at others
    When internalized the same thing happens just inversed.
    It lacks the fruits of true loving kindness which is a reflection of Divinity and acceptance of self.
    When we inherinitly reject the self, we also push away and must reject others.
    When our standards are so high and we always fall short our inward standards become the yardstick on which we judge others.
    Instead of being humans
    We are rules
    Instead of being compassionate
    We are exacting.
    This bleeds into behaviour. And causes terrible suffering for the soul.
    We have two factions in our socioty right now
    The wealthy that uses external validation and does the rules by route
    And holds others accountable by their impossible stuck up materilism
    And the very frum people who internalize their dogma and hold themselves to impossible standards but always fall short.
    Thers also plenty of people in the middle
    But these are the two extremes and the opposite polarities and manifestations of extreme thinking.
    A new path might be neccisary cuz both sides are in the gutter. One is in a fight for his soul
    The other has no soul left

    #2552238
    ipchamistabra
    Participant

    Reply to nevuah. Firstly I agree with qwerty613: you are a koifer – whether you realise it or not. If your rant was only against dogma, I would have responded differently. But since you include ‘extremist’ you clearly mean strict adherence to Orthodox belief, as established by the nevi’im, anshe kenesses hagedoilah, tanoim, amaroim, rishoinim, achroinim, and you propose to follow your own critical reasoning. You are starting from a place that does not end here. You are clearly a troll, and a sick one at that.

    #2552263
    DaMoshe
    Participant

    nevuah, your entire argument is based on a false premise – that morality comes from within. It does not. Morality comes from Hashem and the Torah.
    Here’s an example where I surrender my personal view to a larger ideology: society today, for the most part, is very accepting of same-gender marriages. From a personal perspective, why should I oppose this? Why should it matter to me who someone wants to be with, and what they do? But, the Torah tells us that it’s wrong, and therefore I surrender my personal thoughts to the will of Hashem, and I oppose it. The morality is set by Hashem and the Torah, not by my personal views.
    In the wild, animals live by survival of the fittest. The strong take from the weak. Why shouldn’t mankind be the same? If I’m stronger than you, why shouldn’t I be able to just attack you and take whatever I want from you? It’s because Hashem told us that killing is wrong, stealing is wrong, etc that society has these laws. Yes, it dates back thousands of years, even pre-dating Matan Torah. But it came from what Hashem told the people at the time, and it became the norm in society.
    So yes, absolutely we should surrender to the greater ideology of the Torah!

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.