June 16, 2010 9:59 pm at 9:59 pm #591784Y.S.G.F.K.Member
is their such a thing as donating a vein??June 16, 2010 10:31 pm at 10:31 pm #686633YW Moderator-80Member
I’m fairly certain there is no such thing. Why do you ask?June 16, 2010 10:56 pm at 10:56 pm #686634d aMember
Now look at that! moderator par excellence! Who says?!June 17, 2010 3:13 am at 3:13 am #686635AnonymousInactive
Never heard of such a thingJune 17, 2010 7:56 am at 7:56 am #686636
i don’t think that’s medically possible.June 17, 2010 3:12 pm at 3:12 pm #686637
Do you have too much scar tissue from giving blood too many times?June 17, 2010 3:16 pm at 3:16 pm #686638jewish girlMember
its not mediacally possible but depends on what situation things can be done to help for example varicrose veins..June 17, 2010 6:57 pm at 6:57 pm #686639HealthParticipant
Of course someone can give someone else a vein, but why would it be needed- everyone has their own? YSGFK must of read somewhere the words “vein donation” -this doesn’t mean getting a vein from another human, this means harvesting a pts. own vein to do a surgical procedure such as a CABG. People have enough of their own veins to take, it wouldn’t be necessary to go elsewhere. Even if some are damaged, there will always be plenty of healthy ones. This has nothing to do with varicose veins.June 17, 2010 8:49 pm at 8:49 pm #686640Y.S.G.F.K.Member
I didn’t think that it was possible either but someone told me that they donated a vein and I did not believe them but I was just making sure that it does not make senceJune 17, 2010 9:22 pm at 9:22 pm #686641
That’s a great idea for a thread topic- true/false or something to do with gullibility.
Did they invent a new type of tomato in Japan?June 18, 2010 11:18 am at 11:18 am #686642
no they actually invented it yerushalayim. around the same time that they took the word gullible out of the dictionary…June 18, 2010 3:10 pm at 3:10 pm #686643squeakParticipant
You should proofread your posts before sending. Gulllible is the most frequently misspelled word. It should be spelled as I did, with 3 “l”s, and not as you (and most other people) spell it, with only 2. Check the dictionary if you find this hard to believe.June 18, 2010 3:18 pm at 3:18 pm #686644YW Moderator-80Member
It should be spelled as I did, with 3 “l”s
You spelled it with 4 “l”sJune 18, 2010 4:41 pm at 4:41 pm #686646d aMember
Do you think I’m that gullible that I’m actually going to check a dictionary to see that? No way!June 18, 2010 6:30 pm at 6:30 pm #686647
Gullible is spelled with 3 l’s by folks like Tweety- e.g. “Dat Squeak is reawy guWibwe if he finks Sywvester is sweeping.”
(So much for computers; at least when I make a ‘w’ it looks like 3 l’s.)June 19, 2010 9:02 pm at 9:02 pm #686648
squeak – lol! you almost had me there for a second, before i went on to the part where you explained yourself…
btw, totally unrelated, but how do you guys put subtitles under your username? i can’t figure it out!June 21, 2010 12:53 am at 12:53 am #686649moishyParticipant
emoticon613: just ask mod-80 to do it for you and tell him what you want it to say.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.