Home › Forums › Bais Medrash › In this thread we criticize Popa. By Popa.
- This topic has 30 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by longarekel.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2012 6:58 pm at 6:58 pm #601885popa_bar_abbaParticipant
I am writing a dvar torah for my minyan’s weekly rag. This is my draft; I’d appreciate some criticism, both on the writing and the content:
The medrash ??? ??? ?????, Teachings of the House of Elijah (ascribed to Elijah the prophet) wonders why Devorah was chosen to be the leader of Israel. (10 ????? ???). Specifically, it notes that Pinchas the high priest, grandson of Aaron, who had distinguished himself before Moses in the desert, was still living and would have been a natural choice as leader.
February 2, 2012 7:14 pm at 7:14 pm #849337☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf you’re using Aaron, Moses and Elijah, use Phinehas.
Why capitalize “Judge”?
Medrash should be capitalized (and consider Midrash).
Why the Sefardi Shabbat?
Interesting, BTW, that Eliyahu is saying that Devorah was greater than him.
February 2, 2012 7:15 pm at 7:15 pm #849338popa_bar_abbaParticipantI capitalized Judge because it was a specific official position, not a generic term.
February 2, 2012 7:31 pm at 7:31 pm #849339ED IT ORParticipantnow we are gonna find out who u are
February 2, 2012 7:31 pm at 7:31 pm #849340yitayningwutParticipantPopa –
Beautiful vort.
Along the same lines as DY – If your writing Shabbat than you should write mitzvot, and Beit. And it’s usually spelled Midrash.
Would you say the plural of ignoramus is ignorami? Hehe, that’s a real nerd joke.
It is really a nice vort and well-written.
DaasYochid – That’s a amazing chap, that Pinchas was the author (assuming he is Eliyahu).
February 2, 2012 9:31 pm at 9:31 pm #849341popa_bar_abbaParticipantThanks everyone. You are all not very good critics. If one of you would post something, I would criticize it (and you) to the end of the world.
February 2, 2012 10:00 pm at 10:00 pm #849342☕️coffee addictParticipantGreat vort I got bored after the first paragraph,
You’ll have them asleep in no time! 😛
February 2, 2012 10:24 pm at 10:24 pm #849343yitayningwutParticipanthehe
February 2, 2012 11:10 pm at 11:10 pm #849344squeakParticipantRetarded. So what if you reach the “highest spiritual level” by fulfilling your “jobs”? If your jobs are stupid and you do them well, it just shows that Hashem didn’t make you capable of handling real jobs. It doesn’t make you worthy of leading am yisrael. I’d rather have a leader who is struggling with important jobs than one who successfully fulfilled a few menial ones.
Did you think of this yourself? You should stick to the easier jobs, like cleaning streets and leave giving divrei torah to clever people like the rest of the CR.
This is me, doing my job of picking up the slack in the CR :p
February 2, 2012 11:16 pm at 11:16 pm #849345moreMemberis this sad or what..-
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/coffee-addict-popa
and there’s more ‘posters’ here that are him, more than half the coffee room I’d say.
February 2, 2012 11:19 pm at 11:19 pm #849346moreMemberthis popa guy talks to himself all the time. sth has to be done about it! prehaps he can join facebook, since the guy that created facebook was friendless 2.
February 3, 2012 12:01 am at 12:01 am #849347☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPopa,
If “Judge” was being used as a title (e.g Judge Dear), I would have agreed with you.
February 3, 2012 3:10 am at 3:10 am #849348YW Moderator-42Moderator“Barak, her husband was an ignoramus, and Devorah wanted to help him grow spiritually.”
Why did Devorah, who was the olden day equivalent of the best girl in BJJ, marry an ignoramus, was the best guy in Lakewood taken? Perhaps we can hijack Popa’s thread and turn it into a picky girls thread 🙂
February 3, 2012 3:52 am at 3:52 am #849349squeakParticipantWhy would anyone hijack a thread dedicated to criticizing popa and use it to criticize girls? That was 2 questions by the way.
February 3, 2012 3:53 am at 3:53 am #849350Abba bar AristotleParticipantYW Moderator-42 Look at the Medrash. It seems that Devorah became raised up by her mitzvos. Perhaps she also was an am ho’aretz prior to the mitzvos.
February 3, 2012 5:18 am at 5:18 am #849351dash™ParticipantWhy did Devorah, who was the olden day equivalent of the best girl in BJJ, marry an ignoramus, was the best guy in Lakewood taken? Perhaps we can hijack Popa’s thread and turn it into a picky girls thread 🙂
Maybe her father was too cheap to get the best guy in Lakewood.
February 3, 2012 4:34 pm at 4:34 pm #849352ItcheSrulikMemberdrek.
February 3, 2012 5:54 pm at 5:54 pm #849353HaLeiViParticipantDY, in Tana D’bei Eliyahu he describes himself as being from Shevet Gad. So according to himself he wasn’t saying that.
Also, as a side note, when he mentions Eliyahu in a Pasuk he never says, “that’s me”, or any first person reference.
February 3, 2012 6:12 pm at 6:12 pm #849354bptParticipantI liked the content and message.
I was ok with the transliteration of the hebrew text on the seforim (even though I think its not necessary) but translating the titles into english was really too much.
(Still not sure what an Ad Loc is though. Radak or otherwise)
February 3, 2012 6:30 pm at 6:30 pm #849355ItcheSrulikMemberbpt: ad loc is oifgeklerte maskil for “sham v’chu'”. To be really pedantic, every time you want to write ayen sham, write “cf loc cite” in hebrew characters.
February 3, 2012 8:24 pm at 8:24 pm #849356☕️coffee addictParticipantLol more,
Sorry but no (yossi and a bunch of other posters can attest to that) it was a running gag that you missed
February 3, 2012 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm #849357squeakParticipantI don’t believe this, in the entire thread I am the only one on topic and I got no credit for it. The best anyone else could do was criticize the vort, I criticized popa. Even the OP was off topic.
Now I can be off topic in every other thread for a week.
February 3, 2012 9:30 pm at 9:30 pm #849358popa_bar_abbaParticipantThis post is to give squeak credit for his post. It was the only one on topic, and was clever as usual.
February 5, 2012 6:01 am at 6:01 am #849359oomisParticipantThe only thing for which i want to criticize you, is the second word of your subtitle under your name. Otherwise, the D”T was engaging, and I think it head a wonderful lesson to impart. The essence of Midrash (or Medrash, who cares HOW it’s spelled?) is to teach us a valuable bit of universal insight. In this case, that there are no small jobs (only small people, perhaps?), and we all have tafkidim to fulfill that are unique to ourselves. if we do them well, then we are fulfilling Ratzon Hashem.
February 5, 2012 2:22 pm at 2:22 pm #849360☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY, in Tana D’bei Eliyahu he describes himself as being from Shevet Gad. So according to himself he wasn’t saying that.
Also, as a side note, when he mentions Eliyahu in a Pasuk he never says, “that’s me”, or any first person reference.
Reminds of the famous question asked by a brilliant talmid chochom who nebach snapped.
Why, according to the shittah that “vaHashem berach es Avraham bakol” means a daughter, didn’t Yitchak marry her?
Answer: He was choshesh for the other shittah.
February 5, 2012 2:23 pm at 2:23 pm #849361☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe only thing for which i want to criticize you, is the second word of your subtitle under your name.
That’s not (directly) his doing.
February 5, 2012 4:04 pm at 4:04 pm #849362popa_bar_abbaParticipantoomis: thank you.
As DY points out, the blame for my subtitle is a bit murky.
February 5, 2012 5:26 pm at 5:26 pm #849363oomisParticipantThat’s not (directly) his doing.
Thank you, DY, for enlightening me. Then I would say PBA’s post was perfect. No criticism at all, needed.
February 5, 2012 5:30 pm at 5:30 pm #849364popa_bar_abbaParticipantFor the sake of full disclosure, the original version of my subtitle (Mildly Retarded) was pretty directly my doing, through the various underworld relationships I have in the “Modosphere.” However, subsequent versions including this one (I think this is the third version), were not my doing at all.
So I will take blame for the word appearing in my subtitle. But, there were apparently two people who kept it in while changing it.
February 5, 2012 5:35 pm at 5:35 pm #849365ED IT ORParticipantI suppose self criticism is better than non.
lol
February 6, 2012 12:06 am at 12:06 am #849366longarekelMemberSince you seem to want to hear criticism I’ll say this: It doesn’t seem proper to use the name of an amora as a username in the cr(especially with that subtitle):) Anyway, great dvar tora. Sorry, I couldn’t find any criticism there.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.