- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by .
-
Posts
-
From our friends at Politico.com
Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.
Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.
Limbaugh is embracing the line of attack, suggesting a certain symbiosis between him and his political adversaries.
[mainstream media]
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was the first to jump on the statement, sending the video to its membership to raise cash and stir a petition drive.
The Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank run by former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta, also pounced on Limbaugh’s “fail” line, drawing attention to it on their well-read blog.
But liberals quickly realized that trying to drive a wedge between congressional Republicans and Limbaugh was unlikely to work, and their better move was to paint the GOP as beholden to the talk show host.
By February, Carville and Begala were pounding on Limbaugh frequently in their appearances on CNN.
Neither Democrat would say so, but a third source said the two also began pushing the idea of targeting Limbaugh in their daily phone conversations with Emanuel.
Conversations and email exchanges began taking place in and out of the White House not only between the old pals from the Clinton era but also including White House senior adviser David Axelrod, Deputy Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and Woodhouse.
But Democrats kept at it in rapid-fire succession, thrilled that Steele had validated their claim that Republicans were scared to cross Limbaugh.
And Gibbs served up a made-for-cable-TV quote to end his daily briefing Tuesday.
A senior White House aide has been tasked with helping to guide the Limbaugh strategy.
Outside, Americans United for Choice, a liberal group, and the Democratic National Committee are driving the message, in close consultation with the White House.
Democrats can barely suppress their smiles these days, overjoyed at the instant-ad imagery of Limbaugh clad in Johnny Cash-black at CPAC and, more broadly, at what they see as their success in managing to further marginalize a party already on the outs.
With President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney out of the White House and Tom DeLay gone from Congress, the left had been suddenly absent an unpopular right-wing figure.
Few Americans know who the congressional Republican leaders are. Even Sarah Palin is now four time zones away from Washington.
Enter Limbaugh.
And the liberal political apparatus is at battle stations taking note of his every comment.
Democrats are now working hard to ensure that changes.
[keeping them in line]
All the attention only offers upside for the buzz-hungry Limbaugh, said Carville.
he is a creep
The funny thing is, it was the republican elite themselves – thousands who put up limbaugh as their hero at the CPAC (conservative political action committee) conference last week. they were the ones who put him up as the keynote speaker to roaring applause. people were so enthralled as if they had found theor own heroic obama. they did it all by themselves.
Who is?
Limbaugh actually said “i hope his plans fail”, not him. Obama’s scared of him. He was rated the most feared/influential man in America.
Clinton tried the same thing by attacking Limbaugh. It elevated Limbaugh and lowered Clinton (how much lower though could Clinton go?).
Joseph, in what ways do you feel that Limbaugh has no concept of reality?
anon – that comment was from another poster using the same SN as myself.
Actually, here’s an interesting bit of information from Mr. Limbaugh: he recently said on his show that torture is indeed an effective method of eliciting information about terrorists’ plans. As proof of this, he cited a speech in which Senator John McCain said that he was broken by the torture the North Koreans inflicted on him during the time as his POW. However, Limbaugh neglected to quote the part of the speech where McCain stated that he never gave any accurate information to his captors except for his name, and that the “information” he confessed under torture was actually false. Of course, adding this would not strengthen Limbaugh’s case that torture is an effective method of eliciting accurate confessions.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.