I am also confused
why are hazals definitions of galut not good ‘working definitions’ ?
I did not post “random musings” …
I posted hazal’s definitions of galut
why are hazal’s definitions not ‘commonly agreed foundations’ ?
I am not disagreeing perse with anything you wrote
just that it is hollow ,incomplete and therefore misleading , to define a concept by only one characteristic …
all explanations by hazal are relevant …
.
.
or not ?
.
.