modex

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Poor Baal Tzedaka vs. Rich Baal Tzedaka #951859
    modex
    Member

    Rebbe Mechabed Es Ha’ashirim. The fact is they are doing more Mitzvos. As mentioned, the fact that they were given the opportunity for this Mitzva is Hashem’s Cheshbon.

    So, apparently, every Jew should do his utmost to become rich (and as excessively wealthy as attainable), so that he can get many more mitzvos by giving more tzedakah.

    in reply to: Why Can't Women Get Modern Smicha and Become Rabbis? #1071539
    modex
    Member

    benignuman: Is there any clear cut statement in halacha that one cannot dance in Times Square singing the Palestinian national anthem wearing nothing but shorts?

    in reply to: Poor Baal Tzedaka vs. Rich Baal Tzedaka #951853
    modex
    Member

    He says the Hashem cheshbons schar based on the tovah done for the mikabel

    Toi: In other words, an oisher can buy a seat in Olam Haboah (by giving tzedakah) whereas an oni cannot. That would be the net effect of that understanding.

    in reply to: Why Can't Women Get Modern Smicha and Become Rabbis? #1071533
    modex
    Member

    benignuman: I am only saying that we should not say it is assur and if a truly qualified woman comes along and would like to become a Rabbi we should have no issue with it

    Why hasn’t this scenario presented itself in the 3,500 years since Moshe Rabbeinu? Why should we change 3,500 years of Jewish practice?

    in reply to: Women and Talmud Torah #951884
    modex
    Member

    To answer your question find out why virtually all Beis Yaakovs do not teach Gemorah. Neither as a mandatory course nor, even, as an elective course.

    When you have the answer why the Beis Yaakovs decided not to, you will have your answer.

    in reply to: Poor Baal Tzedaka vs. Rich Baal Tzedaka #951849
    modex
    Member

    There is actually a beautiful discussion by the Mahara”l (Gur Aryeh – beginning of Parshas Trumah) where he notes that there were 3 trumos, of which two were each a Machatzis Hashekel, but the third was based on “Yidvenu libo”, according to the generosity of his heart. He explains that this was proportional, not based on the shekel amount. One who had less but gave more (greater in his generosity) was performing the bigger mitzvah.

    This seems to answer my question.

    Thank You.

    in reply to: Why Can't Women Get Modern Smicha and Become Rabbis? #1071522
    modex
    Member

    Not only is it a strong argument against issuing such smicha or manafacturing female rabbbis, but please ask yourself the question why *should* we make woman rabbis after 3,500 years since Moshe Rabbeinu of not having such a concept.

    in reply to: Law v. chain of command. #951896
    modex
    Member

    akuperma: Good point. Kibud Av V’Eim does not apply when a parent tells a child to violate halacha.

    in reply to: Happy V-E Day #951569
    modex
    Member

    And one should remember that the Americans could have stayed neutral (which most Americans favored)

    After the Japs attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, there was no way to stay neutral and most Americans didn’t want to stay neutral.

    Also remember that Germany declared war on the U.S. first.

    in reply to: Centrist Orthodoxy, and the English Language #952239
    modex
    Member

    How is the concept of mesorah harmed by saying that minhagim were influenced by bigotry towards women?

    Furthermore, if by bigotry you mean sexism (as opposed to misogyny) then they are correct. Many halachos are sexist (e.g. a woman cannot be an Eid for many matters). As long as that doesn’t mean that the halachos are invalid, how does it damage the mesorah.

    I don’t know or care what “bigotry” or “sexist” means, but if someone were to say or even imply that any halachos or mesorah or minhagim are wrong or bad or mistaken or ought to be modified, they are violating numerous issurim.

    in reply to: Google Glasses #954455
    modex
    Member

    jmh: If any other developers (like popa, apparently) bought one too.

    in reply to: What Have You Done For Your Neshamah Lately? #951264
    modex
    Member

    Not enough. 🙁

    in reply to: Google Glasses #954448
    modex
    Member

    I’m a software developer and we got a pre-release GG product.

    in reply to: Dans deals, getting cheaper flights #988391
    modex
    Member

    I don’t quite get your description. If you miss the first leg of your flight, the airline will usually automatically cancel subsequent legs. So you couldn’t do that.

    In any event, even if you are breaking a contract with the airline, that is not illegal. It would be like breaking a contract with your cellphone company. You might have to pay a fee or lose your connection flight, but it is definitely not against the law or unethical in any way.

    in reply to: Why did they wear robes in the olden times? #951599
    modex
    Member

    Otherwise you’d ask why are they wearing pant and not robes.

    in reply to: The Bias Against Black-Hatters #949748
    modex
    Member

    I wish. They are just as prevalent in older, more “mature” folks — albeit they will express themselves differently, in more “sophisticated” language.

    It really isn’t any different than the non-Orthodox being very liberal and accepting of everyone — except Orthodox Jews.

    Or non-Jewish liberals being very open minded and accepting of everyone (including, often, of anti-semites) but all that love and accepting ends before it comes to Jews.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)