picturesq

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 51 through 62 (of 62 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050918
    picturesq
    Member

    DY: How do you explain the reason for the halacha of the priority of saving lives?

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050913
    picturesq
    Member

    I thought that part wasn’t under debate. The whole point of men having more mitzvos, that everyone was mentioning as a reason for this brocho, puts them on a higher madreiga just like a talmid chochom is on a higher madreiga than a pashute yid. Another thing that shows this is the halacha of saving lives first.

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050911
    picturesq
    Member

    I specifically said they’re on a lower madreiga, just like a non-talmid chochom is on a lower madreiga than a talmid chochom. That’s the whole point of men having more mitzvos. But acknowledging that talmidei chochomim or men or whatever are on a higher madreiga, while factual, is not degrading others (like non-talmidei chachomim or women).

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050908
    picturesq
    Member

    “Thank you Hashem for (making me royalty and) not making me a commoner.”

    “Thank you Hashem for (making me a Kohen and) not making me a Yisroel.”

    “Thank you Hashem for (making me an employer and) not making me an employee.”

    “Thank you Hashem for (making me rich and) not making me poor.”

    None of these brochos are degrading to commoners, Yisroelim, employees or the poor. It is simply thanking Hashem for making one on a higher madreiga. Just like a Talmid Chochom is on a higher madreiga than a non-Talmid Chochom.

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050904
    picturesq
    Member

    The brocha is not degrading to women or something that Chazal overlooked and they wouldn’t have worded it any differently. It is only a modern perception (not even all that old) of some people that think otherwise.

    in reply to: Gender neutral he/she #1051209
    picturesq
    Member

    Nu, it worked then and it works now. I bet you still use some seforim older than 1787 without advocating they be rewritten. 🙂

    in reply to: Gender neutral he/she #1051207
    picturesq
    Member

    The U.S. Constitution uses the male form in the generic sense referring to either or both.

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051509
    picturesq
    Member

    Eric Garner resisted arrest forcing the officer to subdue him so he is responsible for his own demise.

    in reply to: Dating someone whose parents are divorced #1050058
    picturesq
    Member

    What mamzeirus issues??

    in reply to: Moral Dilemma #1049676
    picturesq
    Member

    sdd, because that guy might not have been willing to purchase the 2nd hat at anything above half off. In which case either he can buy it at half off without causing Grepsil to lose anything, or otherwise no sale on a second hat occurs.

    in reply to: Moral Dilemma #1049673
    picturesq
    Member

    Grepsil, so what did you end up doing? Split it, he took all the savings or you walked out?

    in reply to: 3 most important qualities to look for in a shidduch #1051735
    picturesq
    Member

    picturesq, because looks need to be de-emphasized so as not to be the ikkur. The ikkur is middos, ben/bas Torah, etc. All the looks that are needed are “someone whom you do not find unattractive” as mobico correctly noted.

Viewing 12 posts - 51 through 62 (of 62 total)